Application of drug lymphocyte stimulation test using cell counting kit-8 assay in diagnosis of acute drug-induced liver injury
-
摘要:
目的建立一种基于细胞计数试剂盒8(CCK-8)法的药物淋巴细胞刺激试验(DLST)并应用于急性药物性肝损伤(DILI)的诊断。方法筛选2011年1月-2014年12月北京佑安医院收治的急性DILI患者,收集导致肝损伤的可疑药物,分离外周血单个核细胞(PBMC),经体外培养后,与可疑药物共孵育,采用CCK-8法检测淋巴细胞的增殖程度。每次实验设阳性对照组,以植物血凝素进行刺激;同时以健康人的PBMC暴露于相同药物,同步检测作为阴性对照。将DLST结果引入RUCAM评分系统,评估对急性DILI诊断敏感性的影响。计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验。结果预实验确定了CCK-8法DLST的实验条件。共纳入61例急性DILI患者,其中52例75种药物完成了基于CCK-8法的DLST检测,48例70种药物结果可靠,共19例22种药物DLST阳性,患者和药物的阳性率分别为39.6%和31.4%,特异性为93.8%,38.2%(13/34)的中药和25.0%(9/36)的西药的DLST结果为阳性,刺激指数中位数为2.29(1.8114.20)。将DLST结果引入RUCAM评分系统,可将评...
Abstract:Objective To develop a novel drug lymphocyte stimulation test( DLST) using cell counting kit- 8( CCK- 8) assay,and to investigate its application in the diagnosis of acute drug- induced liver injury( DILI). Methods The patients with acute DILI who were admitted to Beijing You An Hospital from January 2011 to December 2014 were screened,and the suspected drugs for liver injury were collected. The patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells( PBMCs) were isolated,cultured in vitro,and then incubated with the suspected drugs. The CCK- 8 assay was used to measure the proliferation of lymphocytes. A positive control group was established for each experiment and was stimulated by phytohemagglutinin. Meanwhile,PBMCs from healthy subjects were enrolled as the negative control group,and were exposed to the same drugs and measured simultaneously. The results of DLST were introduced into the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method( RUCAM) scoring system to assess their effects on the sensitivity of the diagnosis of acute DILI. The chi- square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. Results Preliminary experiments were performed to determine the experimental conditions of DLST based on CCK- 8 assay. A total of 61 patients with acute DILI were enrolled. DLST based on CCK- 8 assay was completed in 52 patients who received a total of 75 drugs,and the results were identified to be reliable in 48 patients with 70 drugs. A total of 19 patients with22 drugs achieved positive results of DLST,with positive rates of patients and drugs being 39. 6% and 31. 4%,respectively,and a specificity of 93. 8%. Thirteen( 38. 2%) out of 34 traditional Chinese medicines and 9( 25%) out of 36 Western medicines achieved positive results of DLST,and the median stimulation index was 2. 29( 1. 81- 14. 20). After the results of DLST were introduced into the RUCAM scoring system,the proportion of drugs assessed as“highly probable”or “probable”were increased from 74. 7% to 92. 0%( χ2= 8. 112,P =0. 004). Conclusion CCK- 8 assay can be used to perform DLST,and the introduction of DLST results into the RUCAM scoring system can significantly improve the sensitivity of RUCAM in the diagnosis of DILI. Compared with the conventional DLST,DLST based on CCK-8 has the advantages of few requirements for laboratories,a simple and timesaving procedure,and low costs,and can be further used and verified in clinical practice.
-
Key words:
- drug-induced liver injury /
- lymphocyte activation /
- cell count /
- diagnosis
-
[1]WATANABE M,SHIBUYA A.Validity study of a new diagnostic scale for drug-induced liver injury in Japan-comparison with two previous scales[J].Hepatol Res,2004,30(3):148-154. [2]Collaborative Group of Hepatobiliary Disease of Digestive Disease Branch of Chinese Medical Association.Recommendation of management for drug induced acute liver injury(Protocal)[J].Chin J Dig,2007,27(11):765-767.(in Chinese)中华医学会消化病学分会肝胆疾病协作组.急性药物性肝损伤诊治建议(草案)[J].中华消化杂志,2007,27(11):765-767. [3]DANAN G,BENICHOU C.Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs—I.A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings:application to drug-induced liver injuries[J].J Clin Epidemiol,1993,46(11):1323-1330. [4]HAO KY,YU YC,HE CL.RUCAM sacle-based diagnosis,clinical features and prognosis of 140 cases of drug-induced liver injury[J].Chin J Hepatol,2014,22(12):938-941.(in Chinese)郝坤艳,于乐成,何长伦.基于Roussel uclaf因果关系评估量表的药物性肝损伤140例诊治分析[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2014,22(12):938-941. [5]TAKIKAWA H,TAKAMORI Y,KUMAGI T,et al.Assessment of 287Japanese cases of drug induced liver injury by the diagnostic scale of the International Consensus Meeting[J].Hepatol Res,2003,27(3):192-195. [6]USUI K,ODA Y,KUBOTA R,et al.Clinical application of the leukocyte migration test and new diagnostic criteria for identifying causative agents in patients with drug-induced liver injury[J].Hepatogastroenterology,2007,54(78):1752-1757. [7]MURATA H,SHIMIZU Y,OKADA K,et al.Detection and analysis of intracytoplasmic cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with drug induced liver injury[J].J Hepatol,2003,38(5):573-582. [8]CHALASANI NP,HAYASHI PH,BONKOVSKY HL,et al.ACG clinical guideline:the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2014,109(7):950-966. [9]CHEN GY,CHEN CW,FU QC.Set up drug lymphocyte stimulation test(3H-TdR)and observe it's application in drug-induced liver injury[J].Chin J Hepatol,2012,20(3):190-192.(in Chinese)陈高艳,陈成伟,傅青春.药物淋巴细胞刺激试验及其在药物性肝病诊断中的应用[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2012,20(3):190-192. [10]SUN SS,FU QC,YANG J.The efficacy of drug lymphocyte stimulation test in diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury[J].Chin Hepatol,2015,20(3):215-217.(in Chinese)孙双双,傅青春,杨峻.药物淋巴细胞刺激试验在药物性肝损伤诊断中的意义[J].肝脏,2015,20(3):215-217.
计量
- 文章访问数: 2426
- HTML全文浏览量: 24
- PDF下载量: 462
- 被引次数: 0