两种微创术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的效果比较

陈高飞; 芦小龙; 李剑辉; 吕宗峻; 景东帅; 郑建忠

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.02.020

两种微创术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的效果比较

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.02.020

1. 新疆医科大学
2. 新疆医科大学第二附属医院普通外科

详细信息

中图分类号: R657.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 2460
- HTML全文浏览量: 16
- PDF下载量: 443
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-09-26
- 出版日期: 2017-02-20

Clinical effects of two surgical procedures in treatment of gallstones complicated by common bile duct stones:a comparative analysis

Xinjiang Medical University

摘要

摘要:
目的比较分析腹腔镜胆总管探查术（LCBDE）联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）与经内镜逆行胰胆管造影（ERCP）/内镜下Oddi括约肌切开术（EST）联合LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效。方法回顾性分析新疆医科大学第二附属医院2013年6月-2016年6月进行微创手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的患者56例,其中24例行LCBDE+LC治疗,32例行ERCP/EST+LC治疗,对两种治疗方法的手术成功率、手术时间、术后肛门排气时间、住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症等临床资料进行比较。计量资料2组间比较采用t检验。结果 LCBDE+LC组手术成功22例（91.67%）,中转开腹2例（8.33%）,术后并发胆漏2例;ERCP/EST+LC组手术成功30例（93.75%）,中转开腹2例（6.25%）,术后并发胰腺炎6例、出血1例。2组术后胰腺炎的发生率比较差异有统计学意义（χ2=5.040,P=0.035）。LCBDE+LC组在手术时间、住院时间、住院费用方面低于ERCP/EST+LC组,且差异有统计学意义（t值分别为-5.818、-5.393、-3.566,P值均<0...
- 胆囊结石病 /
- 胆总管结石 /
- 胆囊切除术,腹腔镜 /
- 胰胆管造影术,内窥镜逆行 /
- 括约肌切开术,内窥镜
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration( LCBDE) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy( LC) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography( ERCP) / endoscopic sphincterotomy( EST) combined with LC in the treatment of gallstones complicated by common bile duct stones.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of56 patients with gallstones complicated by common bile duct stones who underwent minimally invasive surgeries in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 2013 to June 2016.Among these patients,24 were treated by LCBDE + LC and 32 were treated by ERCP / EST + LC.The clinical data including success rate of operation,time of operation,time to passage of gas by anus,length of hospital stay,hospital costs,and postoperative complications were compared between these two groups.The t- test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups.Results Of all patients in the LCBDE + LC group,22( 91.67%) underwent a successful surgery and 2( 8.33%)were converted to laparotomy;2 patients experienced bile leakage after surgery.Of all patients in the ERCP / EST + LC group,30( 93.75%)underwent a successful surgery and 2( 6.25%) were converted to laparotomy;6 patients experienced pancreatitis and 1 experienced bleeding after surgery.There were significant differences in incidence of pancreatitis between groups.Compared with the ERCP / EST + LC group,the LCBDE + LC group had significantly shorter time of operation and length of hospital stay and significantly lower hospital costs( t =- 5.818,- 5.393,and- 3.566,all P < 0.05).Conclusion Both LCBDE + LC and ERCP / EST + LC are effective minimally invasive therapies for gallstones complicated by common bile duct stones,but the treatment method should be selected based on patients' condition.
- cholecystolithiasis /
- choledocholithiasis /
- cholecystectomy /
- laparoscopic /
- cholangiopancreatography

HTML全文

参考文献(12)

[1]ZHANG ZM,YUAN HM,ZHANG Z.Strategy of laparoscopy and choledochoscopy or duodenoscopy for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis[J].Chin J Dig Surg,2015,14(4):280-284.(in Chinese)张宗明,苑海明,张舯,等.双镜联合同期治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的策略[J].中国消化外科杂志,2015,14(4):280-284.

[2]CUI HB,LI PW,WANG BJ,et al.Clinical effect of endoscopy combined with laparoscopy in treatment of gallstones complicated by common bile duct stones[J].Chin J Gerontol,2012,32(4):721-722.(in Chinese)崔鸿斌,李培武,王秉钧,等.内镜与腹腔镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2012,32(4):721-722.

[3]HUA YM,WANG JL,YANG AL,et al.Two or three endoscopy combined treatment for gallstone complicated with common bile duct stone[J].Chin J Min Inv Surg,2014,14(5):396-398,401.(in Chinese)华玉明,王京立,杨敖霖,等.双镜或三镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(5):396-398,401.

[4]LU J,CHENG Y,XIONG XZ,et al.Two-stage VS single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones[J].World J Gastroenterol,2012,18(24):3156.

[5]ROGERS SJ,CELLO JP,HORN JK,et al.Prospectiverandomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease[J].Arch Surg,2010,145(1):28-33.

[6]ZHOU Y,WU XD,FAN RG,et al.Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary closure of choledochotomy after failed endoscopic sphincterotomy[J].Int J Surg,2014,2(7):645-648.

[7]WEI L,WANG CQ,LIU Z.Safety and efficacy of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in very elderly patients(85 years or older)with common bile duct stones[J].J Clin Hepatol,2015,31(10):1637-1640.(in Chinese)韦璐,王长青,刘政.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗85岁以上胆总管结石患者的效果观察[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2015,31(10):1637-1640.

[8]CHEN JJ,WANG XM,LI W,et al.Risk factors of iatrogenic pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography:a meta-analysis[J].Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg,2013,19(6):405-410.(in Chinese)陈建军,王西墨,李文,等.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影操作因素对术后胰腺炎发生的影响[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2013,19(6):405-410.

[9]ZHANG HW,ZHOU JP,WEI F,et al.Clinical effect of primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration:a comparative analysis[J].J Clin Hepatol,2016,32(6):1149-1151.(in Chinese)张海文,周建鹏,魏锋,等.腹腔镜胆总管探查术后Ⅰ期缝合和T管引流的疗效比较[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2016,32(6):1149-1151.

[10] ZHANG ZM,YUAN HM.Strategy of laparoscopy and choledochoscopy or duodenoscopy for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis[J].Chin J Dig Surg,2015,14(4):280-283.(in Chinese)张宗明,苑海明.双镜联合同期治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的策略[J].中华消化外科杂志,2015,14(4):280-283.

[11]DING G,CAI W,QIN M.Single-stage VS.Two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones:a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2014,18(5):947-951.

[12]ZHENG MK,GAO HG,XIAO GL.Clinical analysis of mini-invasive gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy with rigid choledochoscope in the treatment of 9 cases with gallstones[J].China Med Herald,2015,12(14):107-110.(in Chinese)郑明康,高华国,肖功亮.硬镜微创保胆取石术治疗小儿胆囊结石9例临床分析[J].中国医药导报,2015,12(14):107-110.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计