原发性肝癌经肝动脉化疗栓塞术后短期病死率及死因分析
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.11.014
Short-term mortality and death causes after TACE in patients with primary liver cancer
-
摘要:
目的 研究原发性肝癌行肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)的短期病死率,分析死亡病例的特征,探讨可能的死亡原因。 方法 分析2015年1月—2020年12月苏州大学附属第一医院介入科完成的所有TACE病例,排除转移瘤、联合治疗等。收集患者的术前及术后30 d的临床及影像学资料,分析术后短期死亡患者的临床特征。术后30 d内的死亡定义为短期死亡。 结果 共纳入741例原发性肝癌患者,行1466例次TACE,术后30 d内死亡10例(1.35%),例次死亡率为0.68%。d-TACE的例次病死率为1.62%(3/185),c-TACE的例次病死率为0.55%(7/1281)。中国肝癌分期Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ期患者的例次病死率分别为0.45%(2/448)、0.33%(2/599)、1.43%(6/419)。死亡病例最大病灶的平均直径为(10.1±0.8)cm。可能的死亡原因为肝功能衰竭4例、肿瘤破裂出血3例、骨髓抑制1例、肺栓塞1例、心衰1例。 结论 原发性肝癌TACE术后病死率低,术后短期死亡偶有发生,死亡病例的主要特征是肿瘤体积大,常见死因推测为肝功能衰竭和肿瘤破裂出血。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the short-term mortality of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with primary liver cancer, and explore the possible causes of death and countermeasures. Methods All patients who underwent TACE at the Department of Interventional Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2015 to December 2020 were studied, but those with metastatic liver cancer or receiving combined treatment were excluded. The clinical and imaging data of all patients were collected before and 30 days after TACE, and the clinical characteristics of the patients with short-term postoperative death were analyzed. Death within 30 days after TACE was defined as short-term death. Results A total of 1466 TACE in 741 patients with primary liver cancer were included. Ten patients (10/741, 1.35%) died within 30 days after TACE, with a mortality rate of 0.68% for all TACE. The mortality rate of d-TACE and c-TACE was 1.62% (3/185) and 0.55 % (7/1281), respectively. The mortality rates of patients at China Liver Cancer Staging Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ stages were 0.45% (2/448), 0.33% (2/599), and 1.43% (6/419), respectively. The mean diameter of the largest lesion in death cases was 10.1±0.8 cm. The possible causes of death were liver failure (4 cases), rupture bleeding (3 cases), myelotoxicity (1 case), pulmonary embolism (1 case), and heart failure (1 case). Conclusion The mortality rate after TACE in patients with primary liver cancer is low, with occasional short-term postoperative deaths. The death cases are characterized by a large tumor volume, and the most common causes of short-term death are liver failure and rupture bleeding. -
Key words:
- Liver Neoplasms /
- Chemoembolization, Therapeutic /
- Cause of Death /
- Liver Failure
-
表 1 死亡病例一般特征及死因推测
Table 1. General characteristics of death cases and presumed cause of death
性别 年龄(岁) ECOG评分 Child评分 病灶数目 主病灶直径(cm) 门静脉癌栓 TACE次数 栓塞材料及剂量 化疗药及剂量 死亡时间(d) 死因推测 女 60 0 6 1 9.8 主干及左支 1 碘油10 mL、Callisphere微球2瓶 表柔比星50 mg 3 肝功能衰竭 男 46 0 5 5 12.9 无 4 碘油9 mL、明胶海绵颗粒 氟脲苷1000 mg、奥沙利铂100 mg 21 肝功能衰竭 女 66 0 7 3 9.9 主干及右支 3 碘油15 mL 奥沙利铂100 mg、吡柔比星10 mg 3 肿瘤破裂出血 男 66 0 5 5 8.0 右支 1 碘油、Callisphere微球1瓶 表柔比星50 mg 3 肿瘤破裂出血 男 80 0 5 1 12.6 无 2 碘油6 mL、Callisphere微球1瓶、PVA颗粒1瓶 奥沙利铂100 mg、表柔比星50 mg 1 肿瘤破裂出血 男 67 0 7 3 6.7 无 2 碘油20 mL、明胶海绵颗粒 吡柔比星20 mg 2 肺栓塞 男 78 1 5 1 13.2 无 1 碘油15 mL、明胶海绵颗粒 无 4 心功能衰竭 男 79 0 6 3 5.9 无 3 碘油14 mL、Embosphere颗粒1瓶 奥沙利铂100 mg、吡柔比星40 mg、雷替曲塞4 mg 13 骨髓抑制 男 46 1 6 1 11.2 右支 1 碘油20 mL 奥沙利铂100 mg、吡柔比星10 mg 30 肝功能衰竭 男 47 0 6 3 11.6 无 1 碘油10 mL、明胶海绵颗粒 吡柔比星20 mg 23 肝功能衰竭、感染 -
[1] Bureau of Medical Administration, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer in China (2019 edition)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2020, 36(2): 277-292. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.02.007.中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2019年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(2): 277-292. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.02.007. [2] PARK JW, CHEN M, COLOMBO M, et al. Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death: the BRIDGE Study[J]. Liver Int, 2015, 35(9): 2155-2166. DOI: 10.1111/liv.12818. [3] YANG JS, TIAN R, ZHANG XZ, et al. Analysis of short-term deat h after transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization in 265 patients with liver cancer[J]. Clin Med China, 2001, 17 (12): 44-45. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn. 1008-6315.2001.12.027.杨劲松, 田韧, 张学忠, 等. 265例肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞后近期死亡原因分析[J]. 中国综合临床, 2001, 17(12): 44-45. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2001.12.027. [4] Special Committee of Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines of Interventional Doctors Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Chinese clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of trantraarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (2021 edition)[J]. Chin J Int Med, 2021, 60(7): 599-614. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210425-00991.中国医师协会介入医师分会临床诊疗指南专委会. 中国肝细胞癌经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗临床实践指南(2021年版)[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2021, 60(7): 599-614. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210425-00991. [5] LI Z, NI CF. Technical details and progress of transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembol ization[J/CD]. Chin J Inter Rad(Electronic Edition), 2018, 6(2): 127-132. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2018.02.008.李智, 倪才方. 经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术的技术细节与进展[J/CD]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 6(2): 127-132. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2018.02.008. [6] LENCIONI R, DE BAERE T, SOULEN MC, et al. Lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review of efficacy and safety data[J]. Hepatology, 2016, 64(1): 106-116. DOI: 10.1002/hep.28453. [7] ZHANG L, SUN JH, JI JS, et al. Imaging changes and clinical complications after drug-eluting bead versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: multicenter study[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2021, 217(4): 933-943. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.24708. [8] SHIMOSE S, IWAMOTO H, TANAKA M, et al. Increased arterio-portal shunt formation after drug-eluting beads TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Oncology, 2020, 98(8): 558-565. DOI: 10.1159/000507262. [9] HU H, CHEN GF, YUAN W, et al. Microwave ablation with chemoembolization for large hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2018, 34(8): 1351-1358. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1462536. [10] YANG GW, ZHAO Q, QIAN S, et al. Percutaneous microwave ablation combined with simultaneous transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2015, 8: 1245-1250. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S84764. [11] ROTH GS, BENHAMOU M, TEYSSIER Y, et al. Comparison of trans-arterial chemoembolization and bland embolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(4): 812. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040812. [12] FACCIORUSSO A, BELLANTI F, VILLANI R, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization vs bland embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. United European Gastroenterol J, 2017, 5(4): 511-518. DOI: 10.1177/2050640616673516.