实时剪切波弹性成像评价肝纤维化分级的Meta分析

吴越; 黄丽萍

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.09.017

实时剪切波弹性成像评价肝纤维化分级的Meta分析

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.09.017

吴越,
黄丽萍

中国医科大学附属盛京医院超声科

详细信息

中图分类号: R445.1;R575.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 2559
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 562
- 被引次数: 17
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-03-29
- 出版日期: 2017-09-20

Value of real-time shear wave elastography in evaluating classification of liver fibrosis: a Meta-analysis

Department of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University

摘要

摘要: 目的应用Meta分析评价实时剪切波弹性成像（SWE）技术对肝纤维化分级的诊断价值。方法对2010年1月-2016年12月Pubmed、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普和万方等数据库中有关SWE评价肝纤维化分级的中、英文文献进行筛选和评价,应用Meta-disc 1.4软件对入选文献各项数据进行整合分析。结果共纳入11篇英文文献,总病例数为1560例。SWE对≥F2组的合并敏感度、特异度、诊断比值比（DOR）分别为0.85[95%可信区间（95%CI）:0.820.87]、0.79（95%CI:0.760.82）、30.81（95%CI:16.5557.34）;≥F3组的合并敏感度、特异度、DOR分别0.87（95%CI:0.840.91）、0.84（95%CI:0.820.87）、41.45（95%CI:18.2594.45）;F4组的合并敏感度、特异度、DOR分别0.88（95%CI:0.830.91）、0.91（95%CI:...
- 肝硬化 /
- 弹性成像技术 /
- Meta分析
Abstract: Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of real-time shear wave elastography ( SWE) technique in evaluating classification of liver fibrosis. Methods Pub Med, CNKI, CBM, VIP, and Wanfang Data were searched for Chinese and English articles on SWE for evaluating classification of liver fibrosis published from January 2010 to December 2016, and these articles were screened and evaluated.Meta-disc 1. 4 software was used for the meta-analysis of the data in the articles included. Results A total of 11 English articles were included, with 1560 cases in total. In the ≥F2 group, SWE had a pooled sensitivity of 0. 85 ( 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0. 82-0. 87) , a specificity of 0. 79 ( 95% CI: 0. 76-0. 82) , and a diagnostic odds ratio ( DOR) of 30. 81 ( 95% CI: 16. 55-57. 34) . In the ≥F3 group, SWE had a pooled sensitivity of 0. 87 ( 95% CI: 0. 84-0. 91) , a specificity of 0. 84 ( 95% CI: 0. 82-0. 87) , and a DOR of 41. 45 ( 95%CI: 18. 25-94. 45) . In the F4 group, SWE had a pooled sensitivity of 0. 88 ( 95% CI: 0. 83-0. 91) , a specificity of 0. 91 ( 95% CI: 0. 89-0. 92) , and a DOR of 67. 18 ( 95% CI: 30. 03-150. 31) . The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for these three groups were 0. 914 7, 0. 922 3, and 0. 952 0, respectively. Conclusion SWE has a high diagnostic value in evaluating the classification of liver fibrosis and can be used to determine liver fibrosis stage in clinical practice.
- liver fibrosis /
- elasticity imaging techniques /
- Meta-analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(26)

[1]ZHOU GD, ZHAO JM.Pathological characteristics of liver fibrosis/cirrhosis caused by different causes[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2016, 32 (6) :1086-1091. (in Chinese) 周光德, 赵景民.不同病因致肝纤维化/肝硬化的病理特点[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2016, 32 (6) :1086-1091.

[2]BRAVO AA, SHETH SG, CHOPRA S.Liver biopsy[J].N Engl JMed, 2001, 344 (7) :495-500.

[3]LI QB, WANG XM, JIANG B.Evaluation of the value of conventional ultrasound combined with real-time shear wave elastography in differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules by logistic regression[J].Chin J Med Offic, 2015, 43 (6) :581-584. (in Chinese) 李乔贝, 王学梅, 姜镔, 等.Logistic回归模型评价常规超声及实时剪切波弹性成像技术对甲状腺结节良恶性鉴别诊断的价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2015, 43 (6) :581-584.

[4]BEDOSSA P, POYNARD T.An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C.The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group[J].Hepatology, 1996, 24 (2) :289-293.

[5]DIAO X, AI CL, QIN L, et al.QUADAS development:a tool for systematically assessing the quality of diagnostic research[J].Chin J Evid-based Med, 2007, 7 (4) :296-306. (in Chinese) 刁骧, 艾昌林, 秦莉, 等.QUADAS的制定:用于系统评价诊断性研究质量的工具[J].中国循证医学杂志, 2007, 7 (4) :296-306.

[6]FERRAIOLI G, TINELLI C, DAL BELLO B, et al.Accuracy of real-time shear wave elas-tography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C:a pilot study[J].Hepatology, 2012, 56 (6) :2125-2133.

[7]JEONG JY, KIM TY, SOHN JH, et al.Real time shear wave elastography in chronic liver diseases:accuracy for predicting liver fibrosis, in comparison with serum markers[J].World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20 (38) :13920-13929.

[8]SAMIR AE, DHYANI M, VIJ A, et al.Shear-wave elastography for the estimation of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease:determining accuracy and ideal site for measurement[J].Radiology, 2015, 274 (3) :888-896.

[9]TUTAR O, BESER OF, ADALETLI I, et al.Shear wave elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in children[J].J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2014, 58 (6) :750-755.

[10]TADA T, KUMADA T, TOYODA H, et al.Utility of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection without cirrhosis:comparison of liver fibrosis indices[J].Hepatol Res, 2015, 45 (10) :e122-e129.

[11]LEUNG VY, SHEN J, WONG VW, et al.Quantitative elastography of liver fibrosis and spleen stiffness in chronic hepatitis B carriers:comparison of shear-wave elastography and transient elastography with liver biopsy correlation[J].Radiology, 2013, 269 (3) :910-918.

[12]SPOREA I, BOTA S, GRADINARU-TASCAU O, et al.Which are the cut-off values of 2D-Shear Wave Elastography (2D-SWE) liver stiffness measurements predicting different stages of liver fibrosis, considering Transient Elastography (TE) as the reference method?[J].Eur J Radiol, 2014, 83 (3) :e118-e122.

[13]GUIBAL A, RENOSI G, RODE A, et al.Shear wave elastography:an accurate technique to stage liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases[J].Diagn Interv Imaging, 2016, 97 (1) :91-99.

[14]ZHENG J, GUO H, ZENG J, et al.Two-dimensional shearwave elastography and conventional US:the optimal evaluation of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis[J].Radiology, 2015, 275 (1) :290-300.

[15]YEGIN EG, YEGIN K, KARATAY E, et al.Quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis by digital image analysis:relationship to ishak staging and elasticity by shear-wave elastography[J].J Dig Dis, 2015, 16 (4) :217-227.

[16]ZENG J, LIU GJ, HUANG ZP, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of twodimensional shear wave elastography for the non-invasive staging of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B:a cohort study with internal validation[J].Eur Radiol, 2014, 24 (10) :2572-2581.

[17]TSOCHATZIS E, GURUSAMY K, NTAOULA S, et al.Elastography for the diagnosis of severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease:a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy[J].J Hepatol, 2011, 54 (4) :650-659.

[18] ZHENG J, ZENG J, ZHENG RQ, et al.Comparison of realtime shear wave elastic imaging and conventional ultrasonography in evaluating hepatic fibrosis of chronic[J].Chin J Ultraso, 2013, 22 (12) :1036-1040. (in Chinese) 郑剑, 曾婕, 郑荣琴, 等.实时剪切波弹性成像与常规超声评估慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化的比较[J].中华超声影像学杂志, 2013, 22 (12) :1036-1040.

[19]FERRAIOLI G, TINELLI C, MALFITANO A, et al.Performance of real-time strain elastography, transient elastography, and aspartate-to-platelet ratio index in the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C[J].Am J Roentgenol, 2012, 199 (1) :19-25.

[20]ZHANG JJ, LI GJ, MA SY, et al.Comparative analysis of the diagnostic value of shear wave elasticity imaging and transient elasticity imaging in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B[J].Mod Practical Med, 2016, 28 (3) :288-290. (in Chinese) 张靖靓, 李国军, 马苏亚, 等.剪切波弹性成像与瞬时弹性成像对慢性乙型肝炎患者显著纤维化诊断价值的比较分析[J].现代实用医学, 2016, 28 (3) :288-290.

[21] TSOCHATZIS EA, GURUSAMY KS, NTAOULA S, et al.Elastography for the diagnosis of severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease:a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy[J].J Hepatol, 2011, 54 (4) :650-659.

[22]BOTA S, HERKNER H, SPOREA I, et al.Meta-analysis:ARFIelastography versus transient elastography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis[J].Liver Int, 2013, 33 (8) :1138-1147.

[23]KOBAYASHI K, NAKAO H, NISHIYAMA T, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of real-time tissue elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis:a meta-analysis[J].Eur Radiol, 2015, 25 (1) :230-238.

[24]KATO Y, NAKATA K, NAGATAKI S, et al.Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis in Japan.Analysis of infectious hepatitis viruses[J].Cancer, 1994, 74 (8) :2234-2238.

[25]RIZZO L, CALVARUSO V, CACOPARDO B, et al.Comparison of transient elastog-raphy and acoustic radiation force impulse for non-invasive staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C[J].Am J Gastroenterol, 2011, 106 (12) :2112-2120.

[26]BOTA S, SPOREA I, SIRLI R, et al.Factors which influence the accuracy of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C[J].Ultrasound Med Biol, 2013, 39 (3) :407-412.

施引文献

期刊类型引用(10)

1.	许凤麟，张琪，李日娜，王偲蕴，胡彩辉，余明珠，陈镜宇. 超声弹性成像诊断儿童慢性肝病研究进展. 中国医学影像技术. 2024(03): 464-467 . 百度学术
2.	叶苗青，唐颖慧，杨跃青，何瑾瑜，薛敬东，李粉萍. 恩替卡韦联合乙转灵治疗乙型肝炎肝纤维化患者LSM值与中医证候积分的相关性研究. 西部中医药. 2023(10): 112-115 . 百度学术
3.	孙磊，孙楠，张印，魏亚晶，单叔煤. 剪切波弹性成像技术临床应用的研究进展. 牡丹江医学院学报. 2020(04): 93-96 . 百度学术
4.	陈懿. 实时剪切波弹性成像评价慢性肝纤维化程度的临床应用价值. 中国医疗器械信息. 2019(07): 62-63 . 百度学术
5.	黄朝霞，段庆红，焦俊，雷平贵，廖洪勇，罗艳. 超声实时剪切波弹性成像技术评估兔非酒精性脂肪性肝病的实验研究. 国际医学放射学杂志. 2019(05): 507-511 . 百度学术
6.	李磊，张忱，张爱军，徐丹. 剪切波弹性成像结合血清标志物评价肝纤维化的价值研究. 中国实用医药. 2019(27): 29-31 . 百度学术
7.	唐秀斌，林礼务，陈志奎，张秀娟，钱清富，谢丽红，薛恩生. 剪切波弹性成像评价γ-干扰素对兔肝纤维化治疗效果的实验研究. 临床超声医学杂志. 2019(11): 801-806 . 百度学术
8.	李涛，李勇忠，谭敦勇，杨晓萌. 肝纤维化无创诊断的现况分析. 中国当代医药. 2019(32): 28-31 . 百度学术
9.	吴慕冰. 剪切波弹性成像技术评价乳腺纤维腺瘤的影响因素分析. 中国现代药物应用. 2018(20): 46-47 . 百度学术
10.	韩浩，诸葛宇征，杨建，李霞，杨斌，龚黎，刘姣，吴敏. 超声联合剪切波弹性成像技术在土三七致肝窦阻塞综合征中的应用. 中国肝脏病杂志(电子版). 2018(04): 84-89 . 百度学术