内镜下乳头括约肌小切开联合大球囊扩张治疗老年胆总管多发巨大结石的效果及安全性分析

贺永锋; 汤善宏; 郭文伟; 肖翔; 马卫平; 邹强; 刘晓; 郭联斌; 杨小翠

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.02.024

内镜下乳头括约肌小切开联合大球囊扩张治疗老年胆总管多发巨大结石的效果及安全性分析

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.02.024

1. 湖北医药学院附属安康市中心医院消化病科
2. 成都军区总医院消化内科

详细信息

中图分类号: R657.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 2470
- HTML全文浏览量: 51
- PDF下载量: 531
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 出版日期: 2018-02-20

Efficacy and safety of minor endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in treatment of elderly patients with multiple large common bile duct stones

Department of Digestive Diseases, Ankang Municipal Central Hospital Affiliated to Hubei Medical College

摘要

摘要:
目的评估经内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌小切开（m EST）联合内镜下乳头大球囊扩张术（EPLBD）在老年患者胆总管多发巨大结石治疗中的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析2012年1月-2016年12月安康市中心医院因胆总管多发大结石在内镜中心行ERCP治疗的患者229例,根据患者结石大小及胆总管形态选择手术方式。所有纳入病例按照内镜手术方式不同分为m EST+EPLBD组（治疗组）与EST组（对照组）,观察2组首次取石成功率,机械碎石使用率,取石时间及并发症发生率。计量资料组间比较采用t检验,计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验。结果治疗组（136例）与对照组（93例）比较,2组在一次取石成功率上差异无统计学意义（91.17%vs 87.10%,χ2=0.980,P>0.05）;而在取石时间及机械碎石使用率方面比较差异有统计学意义[（18.2±4.3）min vs（37.4±6.7）min,χ2=37.1526,P<0.01;6.71%vs 40.00%,t=24.411,P<0.01]。2组在胰腺炎（2.94%vs ...
- 胆总管结石 /
- 胰胆管造影术,内窥镜逆行 /
- 括约肌切开术,内窥镜 /
- 气囊扩张术 /
- 老年人
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical effect and safety of minor endoscopic sphincterotomy (m EST) combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) in the treatment of elderly patients with multiple large common bile duct stones.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 229 patients with multiple large common bile duct stones who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Endoscopy Center, Ankang Municipal Central Hospital, from January 2012 to December 2016, and the surgical procedure was selected based on the size of stones and the morphology of the common bile duct.According to the endoscopic surgical procedure, the patients were divided into m EST + EPLBD group (treatment group with 136 patients) and endoscopic phincterotomy (EST) group (control group with 93 patients) .The two groups were compared in terms of the success rate of first stone removal, use rate of mechanical lithotripsy (ML) , time spent on stone removal, and the incidence rate of complications.The t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups.Results There was no significant difference in the success rate of first stone removal between the treatment group and the control group (91.17% vs 87.10%, χ2=0.980, P > 0.05) , while there were significant differences in the time spent on stone removal (18.2 ± 4.3 min vs 37.4 ± 6.7 min, χ2=37.1526, P < 0.01) and use rate of ML (6.71% vs 40.00%, t = 24.411, P < 0.01) .There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of pancreatitis (2.94% vs 6.45%, χ2= 1.630, P > 0.05) and bleeding (2.21% vs 2.15%, χ2= 0.001, P > 0.05) between the two groups, and no patient experienced perforation or infection.Conclusion m EST + EPLBD has a good clinical effect in the treatment of elderly patients with multiple large common bile duct stones and can effectively shorten the time spent on stone removal, reduce the use rate of ML, and thus reduce the recurrence rate of stones.In addition, this method does not increase post-ERCP complications and is a safe and effective therapeutic method for multiple large common bile duct stones in elderly patients.
- choledocholithiasis /
- cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde /
- sphincterotomy, endoscopic /
- balloon dilatation /
- aged

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]KAWAI K, AKASAKA Y, MURAKAMI K, et al.Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 1974, 20 (4) :148-151.

[2]NIE ZG, DAI ZM.Features and strategies of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients aged above 60 years with biliary and pancreatic diseases[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2017, 33 (4) :656-660. (in Chinees) 聂占国, 代忠明.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗60岁以上老年胆胰疾病患者的特点及策略[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33 (4) :656-660.

[3]WEI L, WANG CQ, LIU Z.Safety and efficacy of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in very elderly patients (85 years or older) with common bile duct stones[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2015, 31 (10) :1637-1640. (in Chinese) 韦璐, 王长青, 刘政.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗85岁以上胆总管结石患者的效果观察[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2015, 31 (10) :1637-1640.

[4]YOO KS, LEHMAN GA.Endoscopic management of biliary ductal stones[J].Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2010, 39 (2) :209-227.

[5] LIU JZ, REN Z, QIN WZ, et al.Clinical effect of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for elderly patients with periampullary diverticula accompanied with choledocholithiasis[J].Chin J Dig Surg, 2017, 16 (4) :380-384. (in Chinese) 刘靖正, 任重, 秦文政, 等.内镜逆行胰胆管造影取石治疗老龄壶腹周围憩室伴发胆总管结石病患者的临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16 (4) :380-384.

[6]MCHENRY L, LEHMAN G.Difficult bile duct stones[J].Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol, 2006, 9 (2) :123-132.

[7]COTTON PB, LEHMAN G, VENNES J, et al.Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management:an attempt at consensus[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 1991, 37 (3) :383-393.

[8]LIU MY, SUN MJ.Emergency ERCP in the management of acute obstructive cholangitis and biliary pancreatitis[J].Chin J Med Offic, 2017, 45 (5) :504-507. (in Chinese) 刘梦园, 孙明军.急诊内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术治疗急性梗阻性胆管炎及胆源性胰腺炎疗效分析[J].临床军医杂志, 2017, 45 (5) :504-507.

[9]SAKAI Y, TSUYUGUCHI T, SUGIYAMA H, et al.Current situation of endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones[J].Hepatogastroenterology, 2012, 59 (118) :1712-1716.

[10]ERSOZ G, TEKESIN O, OZUTEMIZ AO, et al.Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2003, 57 (2) :156-159.

[11]TEOH AY, CHEUNG FK, HU B, et al.Randomized trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy alone for removal of bile duct stones[J].Gastroenterology, 2013, 144 (2) :341-345.

[12]ITOI T, SOFUNI A, ITOKAWA F, et al.New large-diameter balloon-equipped sphincterotome for removal of large bile duct stones (with videos) [J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 72 (4) :825-830.

[13]BARON TH, HAREWOOD GC.Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP:a meta analysis of randomized, controlled trials[J].Am J Gastroenterol, 2004, 99 (8) :1455-1460.

[14]TSUJINO T, YOSHIDA H, ISAYAMA H, et al.Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone removal in patients 60 years old or younger[J].J Gastroenterol, 2010, 45 (10) :1072-1079.

[15]KIM KO, KIM TN, LEE SH.Endoscopic papillary large balloondilation for the treatment of recurrent bile duct stones in patients with prior sphincterotomy[J].J Gastroenterol, 2010, 45 (12) :1283-1288.

[16]MEN CJ, ZHANG GL.The application of endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in the treatment of choledocholithiasis[J].Tianjin Med J, 2017, 45 (6) :620-623. (in Chinese) 门昌君, 张国梁.EST联合EPLBD不同扩张时间在胆总管结石中的应用[J].天津医药, 2017, 45 (6) :620-623.

[17]VOUDOUKIS E, VARDAS E, THEODOROPOULOU A, et al.Conservative treatment of perforation following balloon dilation of the papilla after sphincterotomy[J].Endoscopy, 2012, 44 (Suppl2 UCTN) :e292-e293.

[18]PARK SJ, KIM JH, HWANG JC, et al.Factors predictive of adverse events following endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation:results from a multicenter series[J].Dig Dis Sci, 2013, 58 (4) :1100-1109.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计