PDF下载 ( 1711 KB)
Efficacy and safety of minor endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in treatment of elderly patients with multiple large common bile duct stones
-
摘要:
目的评估经内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌小切开（m EST）联合内镜下乳头大球囊扩张术（EPLBD）在老年患者胆总管多发巨大结石治疗中的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析2012年1月-2016年12月安康市中心医院因胆总管多发大结石在内镜中心行ERCP治疗的患者229例,根据患者结石大小及胆总管形态选择手术方式。所有纳入病例按照内镜手术方式不同分为m EST+EPLBD组（治疗组）与EST组（对照组）,观察2组首次取石成功率,机械碎石使用率,取石时间及并发症发生率。计量资料组间比较采用t检验,计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验。结果治疗组（136例）与对照组（93例）比较,2组在一次取石成功率上差异无统计学意义（91.17%vs 87.10%,χ2=0.980,P>0.05）;而在取石时间及机械碎石使用率方面比较差异有统计学意义[（18.2±4.3）min vs（37.4±6.7）min,χ2=37.1526,P<0.01;6.71%vs 40.00%,t=24.411,P<0.01]。2组在胰腺炎（2.94%vs ...
-
关键词:
- 胆总管结石 /
- 胰胆管造影术,内窥镜逆行 /
- 括约肌切开术,内窥镜 /
- 气囊扩张术 /
- 老年人
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical effect and safety of minor endoscopic sphincterotomy (m EST) combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) in the treatment of elderly patients with multiple large common bile duct stones.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 229 patients with multiple large common bile duct stones who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Endoscopy Center, Ankang Municipal Central Hospital, from January 2012 to December 2016, and the surgical procedure was selected based on the size of stones and the morphology of the common bile duct.According to the endoscopic surgical procedure, the patients were divided into m EST + EPLBD group (treatment group with 136 patients) and endoscopic phincterotomy (EST) group (control group with 93 patients) .The two groups were compared in terms of the success rate of first stone removal, use rate of mechanical lithotripsy (ML) , time spent on stone removal, and the incidence rate of complications.The t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups.Results There was no significant difference in the success rate of first stone removal between the treatment group and the control group (91.17% vs 87.10%, χ2=0.980, P > 0.05) , while there were significant differences in the time spent on stone removal (18.2 ± 4.3 min vs 37.4 ± 6.7 min, χ2=37.1526, P < 0.01) and use rate of ML (6.71% vs 40.00%, t = 24.411, P < 0.01) .There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of pancreatitis (2.94% vs 6.45%, χ2= 1.630, P > 0.05) and bleeding (2.21% vs 2.15%, χ2= 0.001, P > 0.05) between the two groups, and no patient experienced perforation or infection.Conclusion m EST + EPLBD has a good clinical effect in the treatment of elderly patients with multiple large common bile duct stones and can effectively shorten the time spent on stone removal, reduce the use rate of ML, and thus reduce the recurrence rate of stones.In addition, this method does not increase post-ERCP complications and is a safe and effective therapeutic method for multiple large common bile duct stones in elderly patients.
-
[1]KAWAI K, AKASAKA Y, MURAKAMI K, et al.Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 1974, 20 (4) :148-151. [2]NIE ZG, DAI ZM.Features and strategies of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients aged above 60 years with biliary and pancreatic diseases[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2017, 33 (4) :656-660. (in Chinees) 聂占国, 代忠明.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗60岁以上老年胆胰疾病患者的特点及策略[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33 (4) :656-660. [3]WEI L, WANG CQ, LIU Z.Safety and efficacy of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in very elderly patients (85 years or older) with common bile duct stones[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2015, 31 (10) :1637-1640. (in Chinese) 韦璐, 王长青, 刘政.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗85岁以上胆总管结石患者的效果观察[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2015, 31 (10) :1637-1640. [4]YOO KS, LEHMAN GA.Endoscopic management of biliary ductal stones[J].Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2010, 39 (2) :209-227. [5] LIU JZ, REN Z, QIN WZ, et al.Clinical effect of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for elderly patients with periampullary diverticula accompanied with choledocholithiasis[J].Chin J Dig Surg, 2017, 16 (4) :380-384. (in Chinese) 刘靖正, 任重, 秦文政, 等.内镜逆行胰胆管造影取石治疗老龄壶腹周围憩室伴发胆总管结石病患者的临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16 (4) :380-384. [6]MCHENRY L, LEHMAN G.Difficult bile duct stones[J].Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol, 2006, 9 (2) :123-132. [7]COTTON PB, LEHMAN G, VENNES J, et al.Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management:an attempt at consensus[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 1991, 37 (3) :383-393. [8]LIU MY, SUN MJ.Emergency ERCP in the management of acute obstructive cholangitis and biliary pancreatitis[J].Chin J Med Offic, 2017, 45 (5) :504-507. (in Chinese) 刘梦园, 孙明军.急诊内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术治疗急性梗阻性胆管炎及胆源性胰腺炎疗效分析[J].临床军医杂志, 2017, 45 (5) :504-507. [9]SAKAI Y, TSUYUGUCHI T, SUGIYAMA H, et al.Current situation of endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones[J].Hepatogastroenterology, 2012, 59 (118) :1712-1716. [10]ERSOZ G, TEKESIN O, OZUTEMIZ AO, et al.Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2003, 57 (2) :156-159. [11]TEOH AY, CHEUNG FK, HU B, et al.Randomized trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy alone for removal of bile duct stones[J].Gastroenterology, 2013, 144 (2) :341-345. [12]ITOI T, SOFUNI A, ITOKAWA F, et al.New large-diameter balloon-equipped sphincterotome for removal of large bile duct stones (with videos) [J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 72 (4) :825-830. [13]BARON TH, HAREWOOD GC.Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP:a meta analysis of randomized, controlled trials[J].Am J Gastroenterol, 2004, 99 (8) :1455-1460. [14]TSUJINO T, YOSHIDA H, ISAYAMA H, et al.Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone removal in patients 60 years old or younger[J].J Gastroenterol, 2010, 45 (10) :1072-1079. [15]KIM KO, KIM TN, LEE SH.Endoscopic papillary large balloondilation for the treatment of recurrent bile duct stones in patients with prior sphincterotomy[J].J Gastroenterol, 2010, 45 (12) :1283-1288. [16]MEN CJ, ZHANG GL.The application of endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in the treatment of choledocholithiasis[J].Tianjin Med J, 2017, 45 (6) :620-623. (in Chinese) 门昌君, 张国梁.EST联合EPLBD不同扩张时间在胆总管结石中的应用[J].天津医药, 2017, 45 (6) :620-623. [17]VOUDOUKIS E, VARDAS E, THEODOROPOULOU A, et al.Conservative treatment of perforation following balloon dilation of the papilla after sphincterotomy[J].Endoscopy, 2012, 44 (Suppl2 UCTN) :e292-e293. [18]PARK SJ, KIM JH, HWANG JC, et al.Factors predictive of adverse events following endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation:results from a multicenter series[J].Dig Dis Sci, 2013, 58 (4) :1100-1109. 期刊类型引用(20)
1. 朱宏坤，戴芳芳，钱世宁. 血必净注射液对行连续性肾脏替代疗法的多器官功能障碍综合征患者凝血功能的影响. 哈尔滨医科大学学报. 2024(01): 75-79 . 
百度学术2. 肖晶晶. 局部枸橼酸抗凝联合CRRT治疗脓毒症合并急性肾衰竭的临床疗效及对患者凝血功能的影响. 延边大学医学学报. 2024(05): 534-537 . 百度学术3. 王娟，张丽萍，丁童，卫淑润，翁志华. 局部枸橼酸抗凝血液净化技术在ICU造血干细胞移植后弥漫性肺泡出血患者治疗中应用价值. 临床军医杂志. 2023(05): 522-524 . 百度学术4. 孙卫和，许伟伟，冒秀宏，汪涛. 局部枸橼酸抗凝在重症急性肾损伤患者连续性肾脏替代治疗中的应用. 中外医疗. 2023(18): 129-132 . 百度学术5. 赵志强，孟鹏飞，石正松，陈亚君，肖宏涛. 枸橼酸抗凝在脓毒症伴高危出血行连续性肾脏替代治疗患者中的应用效果. 医药论坛杂志. 2023(19): 14-18 . 百度学术6. 李一青，白银果，沙莎. 连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过透析和局部枸橼酸抗凝在重症患者乳酸升高时应用的有效性和安全性研究. 贵州医药. 2023(11): 1704-1705 . 百度学术7. 张妍，荣阳，张芳. CRRT治疗肾衰竭合并顽固性心力衰竭的临床效果. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志. 2022(02): 285-288 . 百度学术8. 张竞葳，田敏，余建斌. 局部枸橼酸抗凝应用于维持性血液透析合并消化道出血患者的疗效观察. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2022(13): 130-134 . 百度学术9. 陈伟玲，邓虹，黄颖妍，李乐，张洪举. 局部枸橼酸抗凝在连续性肾替代疗法治疗中的效果及安全性指标的变化. 北方药学. 2022(05): 116-119 . 百度学术10. 吴允东，江海娇，张伟，曹迎亚，杨尚志，周伟. 不同抗凝方案用于心脏术后患者连续性肾脏替代治疗中的效果. 皖南医学院学报. 2022(05): 436-439+443 . 百度学术11. 严海燕，黄雪敏，李大亮，岑树坤，蒋林青. 局部枸橼酸抗凝在重症急性肾损伤患者连续性肾脏替代治疗中的应用分析. 实用中西医结合临床. 2022(17): 31-33+37 . 百度学术12. 金源源，诸炳骅，费雪洁，王倩. 局部枸橼酸抗凝在肝衰竭患者连续性肾脏替代治疗中的应用. 临床肝胆病杂志. 2021(01): 200-203 . 
本站查看13. 胡新，毛智，周飞虎. 枸橼酸抗凝在重症患者连续血液净化中的应用进展. 武警医学. 2021(01): 78-81 . 百度学术14. 杨向莎，杨福燕，张瑞霞，张军. 改良式枸橼酸钠与低分子量肝素在急性肾损伤CRRT中的抗凝效果比较. 临床医学研究与实践. 2021(20): 46-49 . 百度学术15. 冉梦晓，陈辉，郑浩天. 枸橼酸局部抗凝技术在血液透析中的应用进展. 中国医药. 2021(07): 1113-1116 . 百度学术16. 杨妮娜，李之诉，杨禄，陈王峰. RCA-CRRT治疗中滤器后离子钙与体内离子钙的相关性. 现代实用医学. 2021(08): 993-995 . 百度学术17. 焦清海，郑丽环，张雪梅，王征，杜菲，陈亮. 局部枸橼酸抗凝在危重症患者持续肾脏替代疗法中的临床应用. 河北医科大学学报. 2021(10): 1144-1148 . 百度学术18. 王敬文. 枸橼酸与肝素抗凝对重症血液净化患者临床指标和安全性的影响比较. 中外医学研究. 2021(32): 40-43 . 百度学术19. 冯菁，李和文，张兴凯，王建华，张作鹏，郭燕蓉，任航奇. 肝衰竭患者行局部枸橼酸抗凝连续性肾脏替代治疗时发生枸橼酸蓄积的影响因素分析. 临床和实验医学杂志. 2021(22): 2402-2406 . 百度学术20. 李杨，由丽丽. 连续性肾脏替代治疗脑出血合并急性肾损伤患者中应用局部枸橼酸抗凝治疗的有效性及安全性. 中国医药指南. 2020(36): 89-90 . 百度学术其他类型引用(1)
-
百度学术
下载:
