老年药物性肝衰竭65例临床特征分析
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.07.029
Clinical features of elderly patients with drug-induced liver failure: An analysis of 65 cases
-
摘要:
目的 了解老年药物性肝衰竭(DILF)的疾病特征及用药情况,为临床防治老年DILF提供参考。 方法 选取2015年1月—2019年12月于解放军总医院第五医学中心明确诊断为DILF且年龄≥60岁的患者65例,按临床疗效判定标准进行分组,治愈和好转为治疗有效组,无效和死亡为治疗无效组。统计分析老年DILF患者的年龄、性别、基础疾病、用药种类、临床分型、并发症及预后等临床资料。计量资料两组间比较采用t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验;计数资料两组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher精确检验。 结果 65例老年DILF患者中,男17例(26.2%),女48例(73.8%),男女比例1∶ 2.82,老年DILF分型以亚急性肝衰竭为主(81.5%),临床分型以胆汁淤积型多见(40%)。治疗有效组共26例(40%),治疗无效组共39例(60%)。在并发症方面,治疗有效组胸腹水比例高于无效组(61.5% vs 28.2%),肝肾综合征比例低于无效组(19.2% vs 56.4%),未合并肝性脑病比例高于无效组(80.8% vs 30.8%),合并肝性脑病4期比例低于无效组(0 vs 20.5%),差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为7.138、8.880、15.604,P值均<0.05)。引起DILF的主要药物包括:化学类以心脑血管药物(10.8%)为主,其次是降压药(9.2%)和抗生素(7.7%);中药类主要为中成药(35.4%)和中草药(23.1%);生物制剂中以保健品多见(20.0%)。 结论 老年DILF以亚急性肝衰竭多见,临床分型以胆汁淤积型为主,并发肝性脑病及肝肾综合征易导致预后不佳。 -
关键词:
- 化学性与药物性肝损伤 /
- 肝功能衰竭 /
- 体征和症状
Abstract:Objective To investigate the features and medication of elderly patients with drug-induced liver failure (DILF), and to provide a reference for clinical prevention and treatment of DILF in elderly patients. Methods A total of 65 elderly patients, aged ≥60 years, who were diagnosed with DILF in The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were enrolled and divided into groups based on the criteria for clinical outcome evaluation. The patients who were cured or improved were enrolled as response group, and those who had no response or died were enrolled as non-response group. Related clinical data were collected and analyzed, including age, sex, underlying diseases, type of the drug used, clinical classification, complications, and prognosis. The t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups, and the chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. Results Among the 65 elderly patients with DILF, there were 17 male patients (26.2%) and 48 female patients (73.8%), with a male/female ratio of 1∶ 2.82. Subacute liver failure (SALF) was the main type of DILF in the elderly patients (81.5%), and cholestasis type was the most common clinical type (40%). There were 26 patients in the response group and 39 in the non-response group, accounting for 40% and 60%, respectively, of all patients. As for complications, compared with the non-response group, the response group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with pleuroperitoneal fluid (61.5% vs 28.2%, P < 0.05), a significantly lower proportion of patients with hepatorenal syndrome (19.2% vs 56.4%, P < 0.05), a significantly higher proportion of patients without hepatic encephalopathy (80.8% vs 30.8%, P < 0.05), and a significantly lower proportion of patients with stage 4 hepatic encephalopathy (0 vs 20.5%, P < 0.05). The main drugs causing DILF included cardiovascular and cerebrovascular drugs (10.8%), antihypertensive drugs (9.2%), and antibiotics (7.7%); traditional Chinese medicine drugs were mainly Chinese patent drugs (35.4%) and Chinese herbal medicine (23.1%); healthcare product was the most common type of biological products (20.0%). Conclusion SALF is the most common type of DILF in the elderly, and cholestasis type is the main clinical type of DILF. Patients with hepatic encephalopathy and hepatorenal syndrome tend to have poor prognosis. -
表 1 65例DILF患者实验室指标
项目 ALF组(n=12) SALF组(n=53) 统计值 P值 男/女(例) 4/8 13/40 χ2=0.069 0.717 年龄(岁) 66.50(61.50~73.75) 66.00(63.00~68.50) Z=-0.415 0.678 Alb(g/L) 29.08±5.20 26.36±4.37 t=1.183 0.064 TBil(μmol/L) 285.94±192.00 313.65±141.67 t=-0.572 0.570 ALT(U/L) 98.50(36.75~155.75) 142.00(41.50~334.50) Z=0.888 0.375 AST(U/L) 101.50(54.25~174.25) 174.00(103.50~468.50) Z=2.198 0.028 GGT(U/L) 100.00(37.75~179.25) 59.00(35.00~90.50) Z=-1.319 0.187 ChE(U/L) 2 728.00(1 269.00~3 375.00) 2 012.00(1 464.00~3 335.50) Z=-0.406 0.685 LDH(U/L) 248.00(184.50~300.25) 268.00(224.00~366.00) Z=1.505 0.132 BUN(mmol/L) 5.60(3.48~20.18) 8.50(3.85~16.60) Z=0.457 0.648 Scr(μmol/L) 81.00(61.50~107.75) 103.00(76.00~173.00) Z=1.285 0.199 UA(μmol/L) 159.00(128.25~303.50) 201.00(112.00~325.50) Z=0.600 0.548 PTA(%) 48.95(39.90~66.75) 29.80(25.05~35.65) Z=-5.377 <0.001 INR 1.46(1.27~1.62) 1.94(1.75~2.29) Z=4.465 <0.001 血氨(μmol/L) 50.00(25.00~77.00) 50.00(37.00~92.50) Z=0.739 0.460 注:LDH,乳酸脱氢酶;UA,尿酸。 表 2 65例DILF患者临床分型及并发症比较
项目 治疗有效组(n=26) 治疗无效组(n=39) 统计值 P值 年龄(岁) 67.12±5.03 66.90±6.13 t=0.150 0.881 性别[例(%)] χ2=3.399 0.065 男 10(38.5) 7(17.9) 女 16(61.5) 32(82.1) 临床分型[例(%)] 胆汁淤积型 11(42.3) 15(38.5) χ2=0.096 0.756 肝细胞损伤型 7(26.9) 15(38.5) χ2=0.928 0.335 混合型 8(30.8) 9(23.1) χ2=0.478 0.489 无胸腹水[例(%)] 2(7.7) 5(12.8) 0.693 胸腹水[例(%)] 16(61.5) 11(28.2) χ2=7.138 0.011 单纯胸水[例(%)] 8(30.8) 20(51.3) χ2=2.677 0.102 单纯腹水[例(%)] 0 3(7.7) 0.269 电解质紊乱[例(%)] 21(80.8) 36(92.3) 0.250 消化道出血[例(%)] 2(7.7) 8(20.5) 0.293 肝肾综合征[例(%)] 5(19.2) 22(56.4) χ2=8.880 0.003 感染[例(%)] 肺部感染 10(38.5) 18(46.2) χ2=0.376 0.540 腹膜炎 7(26.9) 16(41.0) χ2=1.357 0.244 泌尿系感染 2(7.7) 2(5.1) 1.000 口腔感染 2(7.7) 4(10.3) 1.000 HE[例(%)] 无HE 21(80.8) 12(30.8) χ2=15.604 <0.001 HE 1期 4(15.4) 11(28.2) χ2=1.444 0.229 HE 2期 1(3.8) 3(7.7) 0.644 HE 3期 0 5(12.8) 0.078 HE 4期 0 8(20.5) 0.018 表 3 65例DILF患者基础疾病情况
项目 所有患者 治疗有效组(n=26) 治疗无效组(n=39) P值 高血压病[例(%)] 15(23.1) 5(19.2) 10(25.6) 0.548 冠心病[例(%)] 9(13.8) 2(7.7) 7(17.9) 0.420 糖尿病[例(%)] 11(16.9) 6(23.1) 5(12.8) 0.458 脑梗塞[例(%)] 7(10.8) 3(11.5) 4(10.3) 1.000 肿瘤[例(%)] 9(13.8) 3(11.5) 6(15.4) 0.731 慢性阻塞性肺疾病[例(%)] 4(6.2) 1(3.8) 3(7.7) 0.644 结核[例(%)] 5(7.7) 2(7.7) 3(7.7) 1.000 皮肤病[例(%)] 7(10.8) 3(11.5) 4(10.3) 1.000 胆道疾病[例(%)] 9(13.8) 5(19.2) 4(10.3) 0.509 表 4 65例老年DILF患者的药物使用情况
药物类别 二级分类 例数 构成比(%) 具体用药 化学药 心脑血管药 7 10.8 阿托伐他汀钙、氟伐他丁、胺碘酮、奎尼丁 降压药 6 9.2 倍他乐克、硝苯地平、卡托普利、依那普利 抗生素 5 7.7 克林霉素、阿奇霉素、螺旋霉素、洛美沙星、阿莫西林-克拉维酸盐 抗结核 5 7.7 异烟肼、利福平、吡嗪酰胺、乙胺丁醇、利福喷丁 解热镇痛药 5 7.7 含对乙酰氨基酚(感康/扑热息痛/快克/感冒灵/速效感冒胶囊)、尼美舒利、布洛芬、安乃近 抗肿瘤药 5 7.7 环磷酰胺、卡铂、吉西他滨 神经用药 4 6.2 盐酸帕罗西汀、利培酮、米氮平、佳乐定 降糖药 4 6.2 格列吡嗪、格列本脲、二甲双胍 免疫抑制剂 2 3.1 来氟米特、柳氮磺吡啶 中药类 中草药 15 23.1 何首乌、土三七、补骨脂、雷公藤等 中成药 23 35.4 脑血康胶囊、复方丹参片、银杏叶滴丸、天麻首乌胶囊、血府逐瘀胶囊、养血清脑颗粒、心元胶囊、安神补心胶囊、牛黄降压丸、决明降酯片、宫瘤消胶囊、金乌骨通胶囊、仙灵骨葆、血脂康、前列通、正胃片、三九胃泰、清开灵、百消丸、独一味胶囊、摩罗丹、肠胃宁、白癜灵 生物制剂 保健品 13 20.0 长寿因子酒、延寿片、鲅鱼油、西洋参 其他 5 7.7 染发剂、油漆 -
[1] Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association; Severe Liver Disease and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure(2018)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2019, 35(1): 38-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.007.中华医学会感染病学分会肝衰竭与人工肝学组, 中华医学会肝病学分会重型肝病与人工肝学组. 肝衰竭诊治指南(2018年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(1): 38-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.007. [2] LIU FF, WU JY, ZHANG HY, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with hepatitis B-induced acute-on-chronic liver failure and the effects of plasma exchanges on their prognosis[J]. J Prac Hepatol, 2016, 19(2): 188-191. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2016.02.016.刘菲菲, 吴吉圆, 张海月, 等. 慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭临床特征及血浆置换治疗对其预后的影响[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2016, 19(2): 188-191. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2016.02.016. [3] FAN ZP, NIE W, LIANG S, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with drug-induced liver failure in Beijing[J]. Beijing Med J, 2015, 37(9): 846-849. DOI: 10.15932/j.0253-9713.2015.9.009.范作鹏, 聂巍, 梁珊, 等. 北京地区药物性肝衰竭临床特点分析[J]. 北京医学, 2015, 37(9): 846-849. DOI: 10.15932/j.0253-9713.2015.9.009. [4] RASCHI E, DE PONTI F. Drug-induced liver injury: Towards early prediction and risk stratification[J]. World J Hepatol, 2017, 9(1): 30-37. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i1.30. [5] Drug-induced Liver Disease Study Group, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the management of drug-induced liver injury[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2015, 31(11): 1752-1769. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2015.11.002.中华医学会肝病学分会药物性肝病学组. 药物性肝损伤诊治指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2015, 31(11): 1752-1769. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2015.11.002. [6] DANAN G, BENICHOU C. Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs—I. A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings: Application to drug-induced liver injuries[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1993, 46(11): 1323-1330. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90101-6. [7] Branch of Hepatobiliary Diseases, China Association of Chinese Medicine, Branch of Chinese Patent Medicine, China Association of Chinese Medicine. Guidelines for the clinical management of herb-induced liver injury[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2016, 32(5): 835-843. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.05.003.中华中医药学会肝胆病分会, 中华中医药学会中成药分会. 中草药相关肝损伤临床诊疗指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2016, 32(5): 835-843. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.05.003. [8] YANG FJ, PENG L, GAO ZL. New strategies and advances on diagnosis and treatment of patients with HBV related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Chin J Clin Infect Dis, 2017, 10(2): 101-106. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2017.02.004.杨方集, 彭亮, 高志良. 乙型肝炎慢加急性肝衰竭诊疗的新策略与新进展[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志, 2017, 10(2): 101-106. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2017.02.004. [9] LIU XY, HU JH, WANG HF, et al. Etiological analysis of 1977 patients with acute liver failure, subacute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Chin J Hepatol, 2008, 16(10): 772-775. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-3418.2008.10.013.刘晓燕, 胡瑾华, 王慧芬, 等. 1977例急性、亚急性、慢加急性肝衰竭患者的病因与转归分析[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2008, 16(10): 772-775. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-3418.2008.10.013. [10] GALVIN Z, McDONOUGH A, RYAN J, et al. Blood alanine aminotransferase levels > 1, 000 IU/l - causes and outcomes[J]. Clin Med (Lond), 2015, 15(3): 244-247. DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-3-244. [11] GOLDBERG DS, FORDE KA, CARBONARI DM, et al. Population-representative incidence of drug-induced acute liver failure based on an analysis of an integrated health care system[J]. Gastroenterology, 2015, 148(7): 1353-1361. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.050. [12] ZHU Y, LI YG, WANG N, et al. Analysis of clinical characteristics in 595 patients with herb-induced liver injury[J]. Chin J Integr Trad West Med, 2016, 36(1): 44-48. DOI: 10.7661/CJIM.2016.01.0044.朱云, 李永纲, 王葽, 等. 595例中药导致肝损伤临床特征分析[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2016, 36(1): 44-48. DOI: 10.7661/CJIM.2016.01.0044. [13] ZIMMERMAN HJ. Drug-induced liver disease[J]. Clin Liver Dis, 2000, 4(1): 73-96, vi. DOI: 10.1016/s1089-3261(05)70097-0. [14] LU RJ, ZHU SM, TANG FL, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of 424 cases of drug-induced liver injury[J]. Chin Hepatol, 2017, 22(3): 235-239. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1704.2017.03.014.陆人杰, 朱珊梅, 唐风雷, 等. 424例药物性肝损伤临床特征及相关危险因素分析[J]. 肝脏, 2017, 22(3): 235-239. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1704.2017.03.014. [15] LI YY, GENG H, YU SJ, et al. Clinical study of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and disease progression in patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Chin J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 25(4): 411-414. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5709.2016.04.013.李元元, 耿华, 于双杰, 等. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与乙型肝炎相关性慢加急性肝衰竭疾病进展的临床研究[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2016, 25(4): 411-414. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5709.2016.04.013. [16] TENG GJ, ZHANG W, SUN Y, et al. Clinical features and prognosis of 141 patients with drug-induced liver failure[J]. Infect Dis Info, 2011, 24(5): 286-289. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8134.2011.05.008.滕光菊, 张伟, 孙颖, 等. 141例药物性肝衰竭临床特征及预后分析[J]. 传染病信息, 2011, 24(5): 286-289. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8134.2011.05.008. [17] LEE WM. Drug-induced acute liver failure[J]. Clin Liver Dis, 2013, 17(4): 575-586, viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2013.07.001. [18] LIU XY, CHEN J, WANG XX, et al. Etiological analysis of 3233 patients with acute liver failure, subacute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Clin Med Eng, 2012, 19(5): 823-825. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2012.05.0823.刘晓燕, 陈婧, 王晓霞, 等. 3233例急性、亚急性、慢加急性肝衰竭病因特点分析[J]. 临床医学工程, 2012, 19(5): 823-825. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2012.05.0823. [19] FAN ZP, NIE W, LIANG S, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with drug-induced liver failure in Beijing[J]. Beijing Med J, 2015, 37(9): 846-849. DOI: 10.15932/j.0253-9713.2015.9.009.范作鹏, 聂巍, 梁珊, 等. 北京地区药物性肝衰竭临床特点分析[J]. 北京医学, 2015, 37(9): 846-849. DOI: 10.15932/j.0253-9713.2015.9.009. [20] LI J, ZHANG YL, ZHANG WL, et al. Analysis of etiology and prognosis of 229 cases of liver failure[J]. Chin Hepatol, 2016, 21(4): 276-279. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1704.2016.04.009.李娟, 张云丽, 张文丽, 等. 229例肝功能衰竭病因与转归分析[J]. 肝脏, 2016, 21(4): 276-279. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1704.2016.04.009. [21] HAN L, YANG Z, LIANG QS, et al. Clinical features of 100 patients with drug-induced liver failure[J]. Chin Hepatol, 2019, 24(3): 229-233. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1704.2019.03.007.韩琳, 杨曌, 梁庆升, 等. 药物性肝衰竭100例临床特征分析[J]. 肝脏, 2019, 24(3): 229-233. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1704.2019.03.007. [22] DEVARBHAVI H, PATIL M, REDDY VV, et al. Drug-induced acute liver failure in children and adults: Results of a single-centre study of 128 patients[J]. Liver Int, 2018, 38(7): 1322-1329. DOI: 10.1111/liv.13662. [23] SINGH S, HYNAN LS, LEE WM, et al. Improvements in hepatic serological biomarkers are associated with clinical benefit of intravenous N-acetylcysteine in early stage non-acetaminophen acute liver failure[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2013, 58(5): 1397-1402. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2512-x. [24] FONTANA RJ, HAYASHI PH, GU J, et al. Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality within 6 months from onset[J]. Gastroenterology, 2014, 147(1): 96-108. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.045. [25] DUAN Y, XING HC, WANG XM, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of drug-induced subacute liver failure[J/CD]. Chin J Exp Clin Infect Dis (Electronic Edition), 2012, 6(3): 217-220. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2012.03.010.段英, 邢卉春, 王笑梅, 等. 药物性亚急性肝衰竭临床特点及预后[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(3): 217-220. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2012.03.010.
计量
- 文章访问数: 593
- HTML全文浏览量: 178
- PDF下载量: 54
- 被引次数: 0