中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 41 Issue 1
Jan.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Effect of sorafenib and donafenib on the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin in rats

DOI: 10.12449/JCH250114
Research funding:

Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (H2022307063)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: DONG Zhanjun, 13313213656@126.com (ORCID: 0000-0001-5349-4907)
  • Received Date: 2024-05-23
  • Accepted Date: 2024-07-05
  • Published Date: 2025-01-25
  •   Objective  To investigate the effect of sorafenib and donafenib on the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin in rats, and to provide a theoretical basis for drug combination in clinical practice.  Methods  A total of 24 male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into groups A, B, C, and D, with 6 rats in each group. The rats in groups A and B were given sorafenib control solvent and sorafenib (100 mg/kg), respectively, by gavage for 7 consecutive days, followed by ertugliflozin (1.5 mg/kg) by gavage on day 7. Blood samples were collected from the angular vein plexus at different time points, and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine the mass concentration of ertugliflozin and plot the plasma concentration-time curves, while the non-compartment model in DAS 2.1.1 software was used to calculate related pharmacokinetic parameters. The independent-samples t test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between two groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between two groups.  Results  Compared with group A, group B had significant increases in the AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ of the plasma concentration-time curve of ertugliflozin (both P<0.05), significant prolongation of t1/2, MRT0-t, and MRT0-∞ (all P<0.05), and a significant reduction in CLZ/FP<0.05). Compared with group C, group D had significant increases in the AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ of ertugliflozin (both P<0.05), significant prolongation of Tmaxt1/2, MRT0-t, and MRT0-∞ (all P<0.01), and significant reductions in VZ/F and CLZ/F (both P<0.05).  Conclusion  Both sorafenib and donafenib can affect the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin in rats and significantly increase the plasma exposure of ertugliflozin. The efficacy and adverse drug reactions of ertugliflozin should be closely monitored during combined use in clinical practice and the dose should be adjusted when necessary to avoid the potential risk of drug interaction.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer(2024 edition)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2024, 40( 5): 893- 918. DOI: 10.12449/JCH240508.

    中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2024年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40( 5): 893- 918. DOI: 10.12449/JCH240508.
    [2]
    ZHENG RS, CHEN R, HAN BF, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022[J]. Chin J Oncol, 2024, 46( 3): 221- 231. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240119-00035.

    郑荣寿, 陈茹, 韩冰峰, 等. 2022年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2024, 46( 3): 221- 231. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240119-00035.
    [3]
    BRAY F, FERLAY J, SOERJOMATARAM I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68( 6): 394- 424. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492.
    [4]
    TILG H, MOSCHEN AR, RODEN M. NAFLD and diabetes mellitus[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 14( 1): 32- 42. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.147.
    [5]
    AJMERA V, CEPIN S, TESFAI K, et al. A prospective study on the prevalence of NAFLD, advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in people with type 2 diabetes[J]. J Hepatol, 2023, 78( 3): 471- 478. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.11.010.
    [6]
    RAOUL JL, KUDO M, FINN RS, et al. Systemic therapy for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Sorafenib and beyond[J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2018, 68: 16- 24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.05.006.
    [7]
    DENG N, LI XM, DING XY, et al. Current status and progress of second-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma[J/CD]. Chin J Liver Dis(Electronic Edition), 2024, 16( 1): 1- 6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7380.2024.01.001.

    邓娜, 栗晓咪, 丁晓燕, 等. 肝细胞癌二线治疗的现状和进展[J/CD]. 中国肝脏病杂志(电子版), 2024, 16( 1): 1- 6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7380.2024.01.001.
    [8]
    KEAM SJ, DUGGAN S. Donafenib: First approval[J]. Drugs, 2021, 81( 16): 1915- 1920. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-021-01603-0.
    [9]
    Expert Committee on Liver Cancer, Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology; Expert Committee on Safety Management of Antitumor Drugs of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. Consensus of experts on the clinical application of donafenib in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chin Clin Oncol, 2022, 27( 8): 749- 757. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0460.2022.08.013.

    中国临床肿瘤学会肝癌专家委员会, 中国临床肿瘤学会抗肿瘤药物安全管理专家委员会. 多纳非尼治疗肝细胞癌临床应用专家共识[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2022, 27( 8): 749- 757. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0460.2022.08.013.
    [10]
    HE XR, LI Y, MA YL, et al. Development of UPLC-MS/MS method to study the pharmacokinetic interaction between sorafenib and dapagliflozin in rats[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27( 19): 6190. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196190.
    [11]
    HE XR, LI Y, LI YJ, et al. In vivo assessment of the pharmacokinetic interactions between donafenib and dapagliflozin, donafenib and canagliflozin in rats[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2023, 162: 114663. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114663.
    [12]
    GONG L, GIACOMINI MM, GIACOMINI C, et al. PharmGKB summary: Sorafenib pathways[J]. Pharmacogenet Genomics, 2017, 27( 6): 240- 246. DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000279.
    [13]
    WOJCIK C, WARDEN BA. Mechanisms and evidence for heart failure benefits from SGLT2 inhibitors[J]. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2019, 21( 10): 130. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-019-1219-4.
    [14]
    VALLON V. The mechanisms and therapeutic potential of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetes mellitus[J]. Annu Rev Med, 2015, 66: 255- 270. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-051013-110046.
    [15]
    Chinese Diabetes Society. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in China(2020 edition)[J]. Chin J Diabetes Mellitus, 2021, 13( 4): 315- 409. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20210221-00095.

    中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2021, 13( 4): 315- 409. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20210221-00095.
    [16]
    COSENTINO F, CANNON CP, CHERNEY DZI, et al. Efficacy of ertugliflozin on heart failure-related events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Results of the VERTIS CV trial[J]. Circulation, 2020, 142( 23): 2205- 2215. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050255.
    [17]
    CHENG Q, ZOU SP, SUN MH. Clinical therapeutic value of a new generation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor ertugliflozin in patients with diabetes and special populations[J]. Chin J New Drugs, 2023, 32( 11): 1099- 1107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3734.2023.11.004.

    程钱, 邹舒鹏, 孙明辉. 新一代钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂艾托格列净在糖尿病及特殊人群中的治疗价值[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2023, 32( 11): 1099- 1107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3734.2023.11.004.
    [18]
    MARKHAM A. Ertugliflozin: First global approval[J]. Drugs, 2018, 78( 4): 513- 519. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-018-0878-6.
    [19]
    FEDIUK DJ, NUCCI G, DAWRA VK, et al. Overview of the clinical pharmacology of ertugliflozin, a novel sodium-glucose cotransporter 2(SGLT2) inhibitor[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2020, 59( 8): 949- 965. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-020-00875-1.
    [20]
    ZHOU N, LI TT, CHEN XJ. Research progress of regulation of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and herb-drug interaction[J]. J Pharm Res, 2022, 41( 6): 394- 399. DOI: 10.13506/j.cnki.jpr.2022.06.010.

    周楠, 李婷婷, 陈西敬. 尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸转移酶的调控及其介导的中药-药物相互作用研究进展[J]. 药学研究, 2022, 41( 6): 394- 399. DOI: 10.13506/j.cnki.jpr.2022.06.010.
    [21]
    EMI Y, IKUSHIRO S, IYANAGI T. Drug-responsive and tissue-specific alternative expression of multiple first exons in rat UDP-glucuronosyltransferase family 1(UGT1) gene complex[J]. J Biochem, 1995, 117( 2): 392- 399. DOI: 10.1093/jb/117.2.392.
    [22]
    WEBB LJ, MILES KK, AUYEUNG DJ, et al. Analysis of substrate specificities and tissue expression of rat UDP-glucuronosyltransferases UGT1A7 and UGT1A8[J]. Drug Metab Dispos, 2005, 33( 1): 77- 82. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.104.001321.
    [23]
    KARBOWNIK A, MIEDZIASZCZYK M, GRABOWSKI T, et al. In vivo assessment of potential for UGT-inhibition-based drug-drug interaction between sorafenib and tapentadol[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2020, 130: 110530. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110530.
    [24]
    DAWRA VK, SAHASRABUDHE V, LIANG YL, et al. Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin in healthy subjects[J]. Clin Ther, 2018, 40( 9): 1538- 1547. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.07.014.
    [25]
    HAN DG, YUN H, YOON IS. A novel high-performance liquid chromatographic method combined with fluorescence detection for determination of ertugliflozin in rat plasma: Assessment of pharmacokinetic drug interaction potential of ertugliflozin with mefenamic acid and ketoconazole[J]. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2019, 1122-1123: 49- 57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.05.023.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (86) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return