中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with oral cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of duodenal papilla cholecystectomy

DOI: 10.12449/JCH250318
Research funding:

Science, Technology and Innovation Development Project of Jilin City (20230406148)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: WANG Hongguang, wanghongguang1817@163.com (ORCID: 0000-0003-1100-9804)
  • Received Date: 2024-08-16
  • Accepted Date: 2024-09-09
  • Published Date: 2025-03-25
  •   Objective  To investigate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with oral cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of major duodenal papilla gallbladder polyps.  Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of eight patients with choledocholithiasis and gallbladder polyps who underwent ERCP and combined with oral cholangiopancreatography for major duodenal papilla cholecystectomy in Center of Digestive Endoscopy, Jilin People’s Hospital, from May 2022 to June 2024, and related data were collected, including the success rate of surgery, the technical success rate of gallbladder polyp removal, the superselective method of cystic duct, the time of operation, the time of gallbladder polyp removal, and surgical complications.  Results  Both the success rate of surgery and the technical success rate of gallbladder polyp removal reached 100%, and of all eight patients, three patients used guide wire to enter the gallbladder under direct view, while five patients received oral cholangiopancreatography to directly enter the gallbladder. The time of operation was 51.88±12.34 minutes, and the time of gallbladder polyp removal was 23.13±10.94 minutes. The diameter of gallbladder polyp was 2‍ ‍—‍ ‍8 mm, and pathological examination showed inflammatory polyps in three patients, adenomatous polyps in one patient, and cholesterol polyps in four patients. There were no complications during or after surgery. The patients were followed up for 2‍ ‍—‍ ‍27 months after surgery, and no recurrence of gallbladder polyp was observed.  Conclusion  Oral cholangiopancreatography is technically safe and feasible in endoscopic major duodenal papilla cholecystectomy.

     

  • [1]
    LIU HR, SUN JN, XU LN, et al. Methods and prospects of gallbladder-preserving minimally invasive treatment for gallbladder polyps[J]. Chin J Dig Endosc, 2023, 40( 6): 501- 504. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20220530-00184.

    刘浩然, 孙家宁, 徐林宁, 等. 胆囊息肉的保胆微创治疗方法与展望[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2023, 40( 6): 501- 504. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20220530-00184.
    [2]
    TAO LY, WANG HG, GUO QM, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with peroral choledochoscopy in treatment of common bile duct stones with gallbladder neck stones and gallbladder polyps: A case report[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2023, 39( 5): 1157- 1161. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.05.024.

    陶丽莹, 王宏光, 郭庆梅, 等. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合经口子母胆道镜治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊颈部结石及胆囊息肉1例报告[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2023, 39( 5): 1157- 1161. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.05.024.
    [3]
    TAO LY, WANG HG, GUO QM. Single-operator cholangioscopy system for management of acute cholecystitis secondary to choledocholithiasis[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2023, 11( 12): E1138- E1142. DOI: 10.1055/a-2201-6871.
    [4]
    LEE J, CHOE S, PARK JW, et al. The risk of colorectal cancer after cholecystectomy or appendectomy: A population-based cohort study in Korea[J]. J Prev Med Public Health, 2018, 51( 6): 281- 288. DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.18.105.
    [5]
    HOUSSET C, CHRÉTIEN Y, DEBRAY D, et al. Functions of the gallbladder[J]. Compr Physiol, 2016, 6( 3): 1549- 1577. DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c150050.
    [6]
    LEE SR, KIM HO, SHIN JH. Reasonable cholecystectomy of gallbladder polyp-10 years of experience[J]. Asian J Surg, 2019, 42( 1): 332- 337. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.03.005.
    [7]
    WANG WH, LI P, WANG YJ, et al. Application of negative pressure suction to endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy[J]. Chin J Dig Endosc, 2024, 41( 7): 566- 569. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20231206-00364.

    王文海, 李鹏, 王拥军, 等. 负压吸引法在内镜下经十二指肠乳头保胆取石术中的应用研究[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2024, 41( 7): 566- 569. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20231206-00364.
    [8]
    TAO LY, WANG HG, GUO X, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with SpyGlass system in treatment of acute cholecystitis secondary to choledocholithiasis[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2022, 38( 8): 1854- 1858. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.08.025.

    陶丽莹, 王宏光, 郭享, 等. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合SpyGlass系统治疗胆总管结石继发急性胆囊炎的效果观察[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38( 8): 1854- 1858. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.08.025.
    [9]
    FU MC, WNG LH, WANG FC, et al. Clinical analysis of 14 patients with gallbladder cancer misdiagnosed[J]. Clin Misdiagn Misther, 2023, 36( 9): 18- 21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002.3429.2023.09.005.

    付明晨, 王丽红, 王福朝, 等. 胆囊癌误漏诊14例临床分析[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2023, 36( 9): 18- 21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002.3429.2023.09.005.
    [10]
    TAO LY, WANG HG, GUO QM, et al. Gallbladder polyp removal by hot biopsy forceps under direct visualization using a novel peroral choledochoscope[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2023, 98( 6): 1030- 1031. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.065.
    [11]
    ZHANG WG, CHAI NL, FENG YJ, et al. Cholangioscopy-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for gallbladder polyp and stone extraction for cholecystocholedocholithiasis[J]. Endoscopy, 2024, 56(S 01): E303- E304. DOI: 10.1055/a-2281-9743.
    [12]
    CAO J, DING XW, WU H, et al. Classification of the cystic duct patterns and endoscopic transpapillary cannulation of the gallbladder to prevent post-ERCP cholecystitis[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2019, 19( 1): 139. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1053-6.
  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.4 %其他: 2.4 %Tiruchi: 0.6 %Tiruchi: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %包头: 0.6 %包头: 0.6 %北京: 1.2 %北京: 1.2 %南宁: 1.2 %南宁: 1.2 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %呼和浩特: 0.6 %呼和浩特: 0.6 %哥伦布: 1.2 %哥伦布: 1.2 %天津: 1.2 %天津: 1.2 %山景城: 1.8 %山景城: 1.8 %广州: 1.2 %广州: 1.2 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.6 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.6 %张家口: 16.0 %张家口: 16.0 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %承德: 0.6 %承德: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %海得拉巴: 1.2 %海得拉巴: 1.2 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %石家庄: 2.4 %石家庄: 2.4 %秦皇岛: 1.2 %秦皇岛: 1.2 %芒廷维尤: 31.4 %芒廷维尤: 31.4 %芝加哥: 3.6 %芝加哥: 3.6 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %葫芦岛: 0.6 %葫芦岛: 0.6 %西宁: 6.5 %西宁: 6.5 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %诺沃克: 0.6 %诺沃克: 0.6 %赣州: 0.6 %赣州: 0.6 %赤峰: 1.2 %赤峰: 1.2 %运城: 0.6 %运城: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %长春: 14.8 %长春: 14.8 %其他Tiruchi上海包头北京南宁南昌呼和浩特哥伦布天津山景城广州弗吉尼亚州张家口成都扬州承德杭州海得拉巴温州石家庄秦皇岛芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州葫芦岛西宁西安诺沃克赣州赤峰运城郑州重庆长春

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (103) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return