Role of dual-source CT low-dose whole liver perfusion imaging in evaluating liver blood perfusion after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension

Zhai YaNan; Li Lei; Yin Liang; Guo QiHong; Lei JunQiang; Guo ShunLin; Zhang ChunYu; Wang HaiJun; Wen XiaoXiao

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.10.014

Issue 10

Oct. 2016

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of Clinical Hepatology > 2016 > 32(10): 1894-1899

PDF( 1851 KB)

Role of dual-source CT low-dose whole liver perfusion imaging in evaluating liver blood perfusion after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.10.014

Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University

Research funding:

Published Date: 2016-10-20

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To investigate the role of dual-source CT low-dose whole liver perfusion imaging in evaluating the hemodynamic changes in liver parenchyma before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt( TIPS) in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Methods A total of 52 cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension underwent whole liver perfusion CT scan 2 days before TIPS and at1 week after TIPS. The image quality was evaluated and a post-processing workstation was used to observe the changes in perfusion parameters. Paired t-test was applied for comparison between two groups,and pearson linear correlation was applied for correlation analysis. Results Hepatic arterial perfusion( HAP) increased from 19. 85 ml /( min·100 ml) ± 9. 48 ml /( min·100 ml) before TIPS to 29. 36 ml /( min·100 ml) ± 13. 65 ml/( min·100 ml) after TIPS( t =-6. 161,P = 0. 003),and the hepatic arterial perfusion index( HPI) increased from 54. 32% ± 19. 60% before TIPS to 64. 11% ± 11. 19% after TIPS( t =-6. 202,P = 0. 029). Portal vein perfusion( PVP)was reduced from 19. 75 ml /( min·100 ml) ± 10. 60 ml /( min·100 ml) before TIPS to 16. 13 ml /( min·100 ml) ± 8. 60 ml /( min·100ml) after TIPS,and total liver perfusion( TLP) increased from 36. 14 ml /( min ·100 ml) ± 16. 61 ml /( min ·100 ml) before TIPS to44. 12 ml /( min·100 ml) ± 14. 60 ml /( min·100 ml) after TIPS( both P > 0. 05). The mean effective radiation dose of whole liver perfusion scan was 16. 5 m Sv. PVP,TLP,and HPI were significantly correlated with the injection rate of contrast agent( r = 0. 992,P = 0. 001; r=-0. 903,P = 0. 036; r =-0. 899,P = 0. 038). HAP,PVP,and TLP were negatively correlated with the sample size( r =-0. 922,P =0. 026; r =-0. 943,P = 0. 016; r =-0. 998,P < 0. 001). TLP was positively correlated with the voltage of X-ray tube and scantimes( r =0. 896,P = 0. 039; r = 0. 907,P = 0. 033). Conclusion Dual-source CT low-dose whole liver perfusion can be used to observe the hemodynamic changes in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension before and after TIPS and provide a reference for preoperative evaluation and therapeutic effect evaluation.
- liver cirrhosis,
- hypertension,
- portal,
- tomograpy

FullText(HTML)

全世界约有一半新诊断的肝细胞癌(hepatocellular cell carcinoma，HCC)病例发生在我国，其中HBV感染是主要危险因素，占全球HCC病例的50%~80%^[1]。HBV通过多种机制在宿主细胞中持续存在，从而导致慢性HBV感染^[2]，并且诱导HCC发生^[3]。超过80%的HCC在肝硬化基础上发展，这表明肝硬化在肝癌前环境中起着重要作用^[4]。因此慢性HBV感染和肝硬化是肝癌发生的高风险因素。由于缺乏明显的症状和有效的筛查策略，80%的HCC患者被诊断时已为中晚期，其中仅有30%~40%患者符合当前有效治疗方案的条件^[5]，故在早期将慢性HBV感染、肝硬化与HCC区分诊断是延长患者生存期甚至根治HCC的关键。现急需一种检测方式能够在患有良性肝病的肝癌高危人群中早期筛查出HCC，从而降低病死率。影像学检查作为有效筛查方法被应用于临床，但是受限于设备以及检测人员。实验室检测则更能筛查大量人群，目前主要的早期实验室筛查方法为检测患者血清AFP，但单一指标检测的敏感度与特异度存在限制。考虑联合指标检测能够提高诊断效率，本文将探究AFP与GGT/AST联合检测在良性肝病和HCC区别诊断中发挥的作用，以期为临床诊断提供新的参考依据。

1. 资料与方法

1.1 研究对象

选取2019年1月15日—6月15日于本院诊治的慢性乙型肝炎患者(CHB组)、乙型肝炎肝硬化患者(LC组)、HBV相关HCC患者(HCC组)，另选取同期健康体检者作为对照(HC组)。纳入标准：(1)HCC组患者HBsAg为阳性且诊断完全符合《原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2017年版)》^[6]; (2)HCC组、CHB组和LC组患者均为首次诊断，在接受治疗前收集生化指标; (3)临床资料完整。排除标准：(1)排除HCC之外的恶性肿瘤; (2)排除HBV以外的其他肝炎病毒感染; (3)排除患有严重糖尿病、甲状腺亢进以及心血管疾病等患者; (4)排除妊娠患者。研究对象均自愿参与本项研究。

1.2 研究方法

采集所有研究对象空腹6~8 h后的静脉血5 ml，以转速3500 r/min(离心半径=16 cm)离心5 min，分离血清后-80 ℃冷冻备用。采用Siemens公司ADVIACENTUAR XP全自动化学发光免疫分析仪及配套试剂盒检测血清AFP水平，参考区间为0~8.0 ng/ml。使用Siemens公司ADVIA2400全自动生化分析仪检测AST、ALT、GGT水平，参考区间分别为15~40、5~40、10~60 U/L。以上操作严格依据说明书进行，所有检测均在试剂盒说明书规定时间内完成，且严格遵守试验相关操作规程。

1.3 伦理学审查

本研究方案经由武汉大学人民医院临床研究伦理委员会审批，批号：WDRY2018-K047。

1.4 统计学方法

采用SPSS 23.0软件、GraphPad Prism 6.0和MedCalc 18.2.1对数据进行统计分析。正态分布计量资料以x±s表示，多组间比较采用方差分析，进一步两两比较采用LSD-t检验。偏态分布计量资料以M(P₂₅~P₇₅)表示，多组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验，进一步两两比较采用Nemenyi检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ²检验。通过二元logistic回归分析，计算出预测变量，并绘制AFP、GGT/AST以及预测变量单独或联合检测的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)，计算曲线下面积(AUC)及敏感度、特异度，采用Z检验对AUC进行比较。P＜0.05为差异有统计学意义。

2. 结果

2.1 一般资料

共纳入研究对象352例，其中HC组86例，男42例，女44例，年龄23~82岁，平均(55.90±15.19)岁; CHB组68例，男38例，女30例，年龄22~77岁，平均(51.40±10.59)岁，HBV DNA阳性50例; LC组69例，男34例，女35例，年龄28~79岁，平均(53.49±11.35)岁，HBV DNA阳性36例，Child-Pugh A级25例，B级32例，C级12例; HCC组129例，男70例，女59例，年龄24~78岁，平均(54.60±11.17)岁，HBV DNA阳性50例，Child-Pugh A级79例，B级41例，C级9例，BCLC分期A期21例，B期31例，C期77例。4组研究对象年龄(F=1.455，P=0.227)与性别分布(χ²=1.346，P=0.718)差异均无统计学意义。

2.2 各指标检测结果比较

HCC组与HC组、CHB组、LC组之间患者的AFP、GGT/AST、GGT比较差异均有统计学意义(P值均＜0.05)(表 1)。

表 1 各组AFP、GGT、AST及GGT/AST血清学水平比较

组别	例数	AFP(ng/ml)	GGT/AST	GGT(U/L)	AST(U/L)
HC组	86	3.35(2.20~4.70)	0.98(0.71~1.36)	20.00(15.00~27.00)	21.00(18.00~24.00)
CHB组	68	4.35(2.35~15.75)	0.82(0.46~1.25)	51.00(23.75~140.75)¹⁾	61.00(34.25~125.00)¹⁾
LC组	69	8.60(2.70~54.20)¹⁾	0.97(0.55~1.81)	69.00(27.00~113.00)¹⁾	47.00(31.00~88.00)¹⁾
HCC组	129	157.10(9.90~6126.40)¹⁾²⁾³⁾	2.00(1.19~3.11)¹⁾²⁾³⁾	98.00(45.00~207.00)¹⁾²⁾³⁾	46.00(29.00~88.00)¹⁾²⁾
H值		124.018	70.202	126.282	135.987
P值		＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001
注：与HC组比较，1)P＜0.05;与CHB组比较，2)P＜0.05;与LC组比较，3)P＜0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

| 显示表格

2.3 ROC曲线分析AFP与GGT/AST单独或联合检测诊断HCC的价值

采用二元logistic回归分析得到不同组别之间两种指标的联合回归模型，然后进一步绘制其ROC曲线(图 1)，计算AUC(表 2)，结果显示，在HCC组与LC组、HCC组与HC组+CHB组+LC组、HCC组与CHB组+LC组中，AFP与GGT/AST联合诊断的AUC均显著高于AFP单独诊断的AUC(Z值分别为2.684、2.241、2.415，P值分别为0.007、0.025、0.016)。

图 1 AFP与GGT/AST单独或联合检测诊断HCC的ROC曲线

注：a，HCC组与CHB组; b，HCC组与LC组; c，HCC组与HC组+CHB组+LC组; d，HCC组与CHB组+LC组。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 2 AFP与GGT/AST单独或联合检测在辅助HCC诊断中的价值

分组	标志物	AUC	95%CI	敏感度(%)	特异度(%)	P值
HCC组vs CHB组	AFP	0.803	0.742~0.864	72.9	72.1	＜0.05
	GGT/AST	0.789	0.717~0.861	67.4	83.8	＜0.05
	联合	0.846	0.790~0.910	79.8	77.9	＜0.05
HCC组vs LC组	AFP	0.760	0.693~0.826	55.8	84.1	＜0.05
	GGT/AST	0.727	0.650~0.803	90.7	46.4	＜0.05
	联合	0.802	0.741~0.862	48.1	97.1	＜0.05
HCC组vs HC组+CHB组+LC组	AFP	0.835	0.791~0.879	86.0	68.2	＜0.05
	GGT/AST	0.768	0.718~0.817	67.4	74.9	＜0.05
	联合	0.843	0.802~0.885	73.6	78.5	＜0.05
HCC组vs CHB组+LC组	AFP	0.781	0.727~0.835	55.8	85.4	＜0.05
	GGT/AST	0.758	0.700~0.815	67.4	77.5	＜0.05
	联合	0.823	0.775~0.871	81.4	66.4	＜0.05

下载: 导出CSV

| 显示表格

3. 讨论

HCC的发生通常伴有前期的慢性HBV感染和肝硬化，在慢性HBV感染以及患有肝硬化的高危人群中，利用有效的筛查方式早期发现HCC至关重要，是患者可能获得根治的关键^[7]。本文纳入352例研究对象，基于相关纳排标准将其分为4组，统计分析结果发现HCC组与HC组、CHB组、LC组AFP和GGT/AST比较，差异均有统计学意义(P值均＜0.05)，此结果与以往研究结果^[8]相符。

AFP作为最早被发现的蛋白肿瘤标志物之一^[9]，其可反映肝功能情况，因此广泛用于实验室检查。综合全球多种指南，AFP在我国可作为良好的血清学指标^[10]，但其特异度低，易引起误判^[11]。在CHB、LC患者中AFP水平也会升高，因此鉴别诊断HBV相关HCC患者时，AFP具有一定局限性，且部分HBV相关HCC患者的AFP水平并未达到筛查标准，因此容易漏查^[12]。

GGT在哺乳动物组织中广泛分布，是一种质膜结合蛋白，血清中的GGT主要来源于肝胆系统^[13]。已有研究^[14]表明GGT通过诱导DNA损伤来促进肿瘤进展和不良预后，释放活性氧以激活与入侵相关的信号通路，与HCC发展关联密切。AST主要分布于肝细胞线粒体内，当肝脏严重病变坏死时，血清中AST水平会显著升高^[15]，作为肝功能检查常用生化指标，GGT与AST在临床中应用广泛^[16]。本研究计算GGT/AST比值并发现其单独或联合AFP时在HBV相关HCC的诊断中具有一定价值，且该指标计算简单，不用另增检验项目，便于在HCC诊断过程中应用。

本研究ROC曲线分析结果显示，在HCC组与LC组中，GGT/AST联合AFP后AUC明显提高，表明GGT/AST与AFP联合在鉴别HCC与LC时有良好的诊断效果; 在HCC组与HC组+CHB组+LC组以及CHB组+LC组分别区别诊断时，二者联合的AUC均明显高于AFP单独诊断的AUC，进一步说明GGT/AST联合AFP在鉴别HCC与良性肝病患者中有较好的诊断价值。

综上所述，本研究表明GGT/AST联合AFP在HBV相关HCC的临床诊断中具有一定价值，提高了AFP的单独诊断效率。由于本研究样本量较小，因此相关研究结果仍需未来增加样本量予以验证。

References(17)

References

[1]WU JJ,LI YC,SUN Y,et al.Change in liver perfusion parameters after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and its clinical significance[J].J Chin Clin Med Imaging,2015,26(3):217-219.(in Chinese)吴晶晶,李迎春,孙勇,等.TIPS术后肝脏灌注指标的变化及临床意义[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2015,26(3):217-219.

[2]LANDRY G,GAUDREAULT M,van ELMPT W,et al.Improved dose calculation accuracy for low energy brachytherapy by optimizing dual energy CT imaging protocols for noise reduction using sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction[J].Zeitschrift Fur Medizinische Physik,2016,26(1):75-87.

[3]LI JP,CHEN W,HUANG YH,et al.Application of CT perfusion imaging on transjugular vein intrahepatic portal-systemic shunt[J].J Clin Radiol,2008,27(5):680-683.(in Chinese)李家平,陈伟,黄勇慧,等.CT灌注成像在经颈静脉肝内门体分流术中的应用[J].临床放射学杂志,2008,27(5):680-683.(in Chinese)

[4]WEIDEKAMM C,CEJNA M,KRAMER L,et al.Effects of TIPS on liver perfusion measured by dynamic CT[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2005,184(2):505-510.

[5]HUANG YH,CHEN W,LI JP,et al.Hemodynamic changes in liver measured by multi-imaging methods before and after transjugular intrabe patic portosystemic stent-shunt[J].Chin J Radiol,2007,41(12):1374-1378.(in Chinese)黄勇慧,陈伟,李家平,等.经颈静脉肝内门腔分流术后肝血流变化的综合影像评价[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(12):1374-1378.

[6]GABA RC,KHIATANI VL,KNUTTINEN MG,et al.Comprehensive review of TIPS technical complications and how to avoid them[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2011,196(3):675-685.

[7]MILES KA,HAYBALL M,DIXON AK.Colour perfusion imaging:a new application of computed tomography[J].Lancet,1991,337(8742):643-645.

[8]WANG CH,WEI JP.Research advances in CT liver perfusion imaging[J].Jiangxi Med J,2015,50(4):369-371.(in Chinese)王川红,魏江平.肝脏CT灌注成像的研究进展[J].江西医药,2015,50(4):369-371.

[9]JIN XL,YANG HF,DU Y,et al.CT perfusion imaging of liver and its application[J].Int J Dig Dis,2010,30(1):24-26.(in Chinese)靳秀丽,杨汉丰,杜勇,等.肝脏的CT灌注成像及其应用[J].国际消化病杂志,2010,30(1):24-26.

[10]HUANG JH,SONG G,SHI L.Rationale of low-dose spiral CT and its clinical application[J].J Oncol,2016,22(4):316-321.(in Chinese)黄洁惠,宋歌,石磊.低剂量螺旋CT的原理及临床应用[J].肿瘤学杂志,2016,22(4):316-321.

[11]SMITH AB,DILLON WP,GOULD R,et al.Radiation dose-reduction strategies for neuroradiology CT protocols[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2007,28(9):1628-1632.

[12]HUANG YH,LI JP,XIE HB,et al.Evaluation of liver perfusion in cirrhosis patients with projects of maximum slope method on computed tomography[J].J Clin Radiol,2008,27(4):529-532.(in Chinese)黄勇慧,李家平,谢红波,等.CT最大斜率法定量测量肝硬化灌注指标的准确性分析及改良[J].临床放射学杂志,2008,27(4):529-532.

[13]HO LM,YOSHIZUMI TT,HURWITZ LM,et al.Dual energy versus single energy MDCT:measurement of radiation dose using adult abdominal imaging protocols[J].Acad Radiol,2009,16(11):1400-1407.

[14]WANG X,XUE HD,JIN ZY,et al.Quantitative hepatic CT perfusion measurement:comparison of Couinaud's hepatic segments with dual-source 128-slice CT[J].Eur J Radiol,2013,82(2):220-226.

[15]LIAO HT,NIE SP.CT-associated radiographic contrast nephropathy[J].J Chin Practical Diagn Ther,2013,27(11):1041-1043.(in Chinese)缪黄泰,聂绍平.CT相关造影剂肾病[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2013,27(11):1041-1043.

[16]STACUL F,van der MOLEN AJ,REIMER P,et al.Contrast induced nephropathy:updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines[J].Eur Radiol,2011,21(12):2527-2541.

[17]JIAO JY,XUE H.Research advances in the changes in hemodynamics and humor transmitter substances after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt[J].Shanxi Med J,2007,36(2):219-221.(in Chinese)焦婕英,薛挥.TIPS术后机体血流动力学及液递物质变化的研究进展[J].陕西医学杂志,2007,36(2):219-221.

Relative Articles

[1]	Yuan WEN, Juanjuan ZHU. Clinical efficacy of double plasma molecular absorption system and sequential plasma exchange combined with continuous renal replacement therapy in treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure with acute kidney injury[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2024, 40(3): 556-561. doi: 10.12449/JCH240319
[2]	Jie LU, Dingchun LI, Ye LIU, Linna YUAN, Zhiwen DUAN, Wu LI. Clinical efficacy of low-dose plasma exchange combined with double plasma molecular absorption system/hemoperfusion in treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2022, 38(11): 2526-2531. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.11.017
[3]	Lan XiaoQin, Ji YaLi, Chen JinJun, Zhou FuYuan, Wen WeiQun. Effect of artificial liver support therapy on the short-term prognosis of patients with liver failure in the plateau stage: A stratified analysis based on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(9): 2005-2009. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.09.019
[4]	Yao YunHai, Gan JianHe, Zhao WeiFeng. Effect of plasma exchange combined with continuous renal replacement therapy on the prognosis of patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure and acute kidney injury[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2019, 35(5): 1065-1069. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.05.026
[5]	Guo XiJu, Guo WeiBo, Zhang JiaChang, Lu YaJing, Yang Yan. Clinical effect of double plasma molecular absorption system in treatment of liver failure due to hyperthyroidism: A case report[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2018, 34(7): 1526-1528. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.07.033
[6]	Wu YiChen, Yao HongYu, Wang KaiLi, Jiang QiYu, Liu Chang, Xing HanQian, Liu SuXia, You ShaoLi, Zhao Jun. Effect of plasma exchange on bioactivity of peripheral blood CD34+ cells in patients with acute-on-chronic (subacute) liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2018, 34(11): 2383-2387. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.11.023
[7]	Li Shuang, Chen Yu. Coping with shortage of plasma-The new therapeutic pattern of non-bioartificial liver[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2017, 33(9): 1687-1692. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.09.012
[8]	Zhou Jian, Wan Hong, Yang ZhengMao, Wang ZhaoXun. Clinical effect of plasma perfusion combined with plasma exchange in treatment of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2017, 33(4): 715-718. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.04.023
[9]	Hou HuanRong, Shang Jia, Kang Yi, Li YuKui, Ceng YanLi, Ding GangQiang, Mao ZhongShan, Xiao ErHui. Clinical effect of plasma exchange combined with hemofiltration in patients with subacute liver failure induced by antitubercular agents[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2016, 32(2): 342-346. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.02.030
[10]	Zhang LiangJie, Chen HuiJuan, Zhao ShouSong. Effects of artificial liver plasma exchange on cytokines in patients with liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2015, 31(4): 578-581. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2015.04.024
[11]	Wu ShaoHong, Gan JianHe, Huang XiaoPing, Lin Hua, Lu NianFang, Wu JiangQuan, Zheng RuiQiang. Clinical effect of albumin dialysis combined with plasma perfusion in treatment of liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2014, 30(5): 434-437. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2014.05.013
[12]	Liu XiaoHui, Guo HaiQing, Zhang Jing, Duan ZhongPing. Progress in technology and clinical application of non- bioartificial liver support system[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2013, 29(9): 661-665. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2013.09.007
[13]	You ShaoLi, Liu HongLing, Rong YiHui, Zhu Bing, Zang Hong, Liu WanShu, Wan ZhiHong, Mao PanYong, Xin ShaoJie. Preliminary investigation of hybrid bioartificial liver support system in treatment of HBV- related acute- on- chronic liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2013, 29(9): 685-688. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2013.09.013
[14]	Hu QiJiang, Jiang YingAn. Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of lamivudine combined with plasma exchange for treating acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure [J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2013, 29(2): 107-109.
[15]	Zhou Jian, Wan Hong. Relationship between changes in serum cytokine levels after artificial liver therapy and clinical prognosis in patients with liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2013, 29(7): 535-537. doi: 1001-5256 (2013) 07-0535-03
[16]	Zhang AiMin, You ShaoLi, Wan ZhiHong, Rong YiHui, Zhu Bing, Zang Hong, Xin ShaoJie. Combination therapy of plasma perfusion, plasma exchange, and entecavir in patients with hepatitis B acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2012, 28(10): 744-747.
[17]	Zhang WenHua, Jia WenLing, Zhou ZiYing, Tang HaiTao, Wang FengMei. Investigation on the method and safety of the non-heparinized plasma exchange therapy in treating patients with hepatic failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2012, 28(1): 50-52.
[18]	Liao JinMao, Li ZhuoRi, Hu XiaoXuan. The therapeutic effect of plasma exchange therapy in patients with severe hepatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2012, 28(4): 302-304.
[19]	Liu ZhiHong, Jiang JianNing, Luo GuangHan, Wu JiZhou, Deng YiMing, Su MingHua, Wu JianLin, Zhang Lu. The value of MELD score for evaluation of plasma exchange in patients with liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2010, 26(6): 615-617.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	姚爱武，廖和壁，张璟. 血清AFP、AFP-L3与肝细胞癌经肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疗效的关系分析. 分子诊断与治疗杂志. 2023(04): 690-693+698 .
2.	朱富平，刘红强，常清，冷伟业. miR-222-3p在乙型肝炎病毒相关肝细胞癌血清外泌体中的表达及临床意义. 局解手术学杂志. 2022(08): 702-708 .
3.	高武林，韦超，郭晓烨. 术前血清MMP-9水平对HBV相关肝细胞癌患者肝切除术后生存的预测作用. 东南大学学报(医学版). 2022(05): 652-659 .

Other cited types(2)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (2273) PDF downloads(473)

Role of dual-source CT low-dose whole liver perfusion imaging in evaluating liver blood perfusion after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.10.014