中文｜English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 37 Issue 8
Aug.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Clinical Hepatology  > 2021  >  37(8): 1888-1893

Clinical application value of difficulty score systems before laparoscopic liver resection

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.08.027
  • 1.

    The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

  • 2.

    Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Research funding:

Health Industry Research Plan Project of Gansu Province (GSWSKY2018-51);

Talent Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project of Lanzhou City (2017-RC-37)

  • Received Date: 2021-01-07
  • Accepted Date: 2021-01-22
  • Published Date: 2021-08-20
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To investigate the accuracy of three laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) difficulty score systems (DSSs) in evaluating surgical difficulty and predicting short-term postoperative outcome.  Methods  The retrospective cohort study was conducted for 142 patients who underwent LLR in The First Hospital of Lanzhou University from June 2015 to May 2020, and their preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical data were collected. According to preoperative clinical data, DSS-B score, Hasegawa score, and Halls score were used to determine the difficulty score of surgery for each patient, and then the patients were divided into low, medium, and high difficulty groups. Intraoperative data were compared between the three groups to verify the accuracy of the three DSSs, and postoperative clinical data were used to evaluate the ability of DSSs to predict short-term postoperative outcome. An analysis of variance was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between multiple groups, and the least significant difference t-test was used for further comparison between two groups; the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between multiple or two groups. The chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups, and the Bonferroni method was used for correction of P values between two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the efficiency of each DSS in predicting postoperative complications.  Results  Among the 142 patients, there were 37 patients in the low difficulty group, 56 in the medium difficulty group, and 49 in the high difficulty group based on DSS-B score; there were 70 patients in the low difficulty group, 47 in the medium difficulty group, and 25 in the high difficulty group based on Hasegawa score; there were 46 patients in the low difficulty group, 62 in the medium difficulty group, and 34 in the high difficulty group based on Halls score. For the low, medium, and high difficulty groups based on DSS-B score, Hasegawa score, or Halls score, time of operation, intraoperative blood loss, and rate of hepatic portal occlusion increased with the increase in difficulty score (all P < 0.001); there was a significant difference in intraoperative blood transfusion rate between the medium and high difficulty groups based on DSS-B score (P < 0.017), between the low and high difficulty groups based on Halls score (P < 0.017), and between the low, medium, and high difficulty groups based on Hasegawa score (P < 0.017). There was a significant difference in the rate of conversion to laparotomy between the medium and high difficulty groups based on DSS-B score (P < 0.017), and Hasegawa score and Halls score identified the difference between the low and high difficulty groups (P < 0.017). For the length of postoperative hospital stay, DSS-B score and Halls score only identified the difference between the low and high difficulty groups (P < 0.05), while Hasegawa score identified the difference between the low difficulty group and the medium/high difficulty groups (P < 0.05); for the incidence rate of postoperative complications, only Hasegawa score effectively identified the difference between the high difficulty group and the low/medium difficulty groups (P < 0.017). DSS-B score, Halls score, and Hasegawa score had an AUC of 0.636 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.515-0.758), 0.557 (95% CI: 0.442-0.673), and 0.760 (95% CI: 0.654-0.866), respectively, in predicting postoperative complications, among which Hasegawa score had the highest predictive efficiency.  Conclusion  DSS-B score and Hasegawa score can better assess the difficulty of LLR, and Hasegawa score has an advantage in predicting short-term postoperative outcome.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(28)
  • [1]
    KOKUDO N, TAKEMURA N, ITO K, et al. The history of liver surgery: Achievements over the past 50 years[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2020, 4(2): 109-117. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12322.
    [2]
    BUELL JF, CHERQUI D, GELLER DA, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(5): 825-830. DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b3b2d8.
    [3]
    WAKABAYASHI G, CHERQUI D, GELLER DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: A report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 261(4): 619-629. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184.
    [4]
    KOMATSU S, SCATTON O, GOUMARD C, et al. Development process and technical aspects of laparoscopic hepatectomy: Learning curve based on 15 years of experience[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2017, 224(5): 841-850. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.037.
    [5]
    BROWN KM, GELLER DA. What is the learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy?[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2016, 20(5): 1065-1071. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3100-8.
    [6]
    ABU HILAL M, ALDRIGHETTI L, DAGHER I, et al. The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: From indication to implementation[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 268(1): 11-18. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524.
    [7]
    BAN D, TANABE M, ITO H, et al. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2014, 21(10): 745-753. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.166.
    [8]
    GUO Y, LIAO R, LUO F. Establishment of surgical difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection and its application[J]. Chin J Gen Surg, 2018, 27(1): 22-28. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2018.01.004.

    郭杨, 廖锐, 罗放. 腹腔镜下肝切除术手术难度评分系统的建立与应用[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2018, 27(1): 22-28. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2018.01.004.
    [9]
    KAWAGUCHI Y, FUKS D, KOKUDO N, et al. Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: Proposal for a new classification[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(1): 13-17. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002176.
    [10]
    HASEGAWA Y, WAKABAYASHI G, NITTA H, et al. A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(12): 5356-5363. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5616-8.
    [11]
    HALLS MC, BERARDI G, CIPRIANI F, et al. Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection[J]. Br J Surg, 2018, 105(9): 1182-1191. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10821.
    [12]
    The Hepatic Surgery Group of Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on laparoscopic hepatectomy and guideline for operative procedure (2013 edition)[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2013, 12(3): 161-165. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2013.03.001.

    中华医学会外科学分会肝脏外科学组. 腹腔镜肝切除专家共识与手术操作指南(2013版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2013, 12(3): 161-165. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2013.03.001.
    [13]
    BELGHITI J, CLAVIEN P, GADZIJEV E, et al. The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections[J]. HPB, 2000, 2(3): 333-339. DOI: 10.1016/S1365-182X(17)30755-4.
    [14]
    CLAVIEN PA, BARKUN J, de OLIVEIRA ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(2): 187-196. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
    [15]
    CHEN L, LI Y. The risk factors and prediction systems for posthepatectomy complications[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2019, 35(1): 217-221. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.048.

    陈龙, 李钺. 肝切除术后并发症的危险因素及预测评分系统[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(1): 217-221. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.048.
    [16]
    HAN HS, SHEHTA A, AHN S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: Case-matched study with propensity score matching[J]. J Hepatol, 2015, 63(3): 643-650. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.005.
    [17]
    CIRIA R, CHERQUI D, GELLER DA, et al. Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 263(4): 761-777. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001413.
    [18]
    XIANG L, LI J, CHEN J, et al. Prospective cohort study of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(13): 1895-1901. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10294.
    [19]
    YOON YI, KIM KH, CHO HD, et al. Long-term perioperative outcomes of pure laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(2): 796-805. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06831-w.
    [20]
    ZHANG NP, ZHANG XJ. Evaluation of different hepatic blood flow blocking methods in laparoscopic hepatectomy of patients with liver cancer[J/CD]. Chin J Liver Dis (Electronic Version), 2019, 11(3): 58-63. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7380.2019.03.011.

    张能平, 张雄杰. 不同肝血流阻断方式在肝癌患者腹腔镜肝切除术中的应用[J/CD]. 中国肝脏病杂志(电子版), 2019, 11(3): 58-63. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7380.2019.03.011.
    [21]
    CIRIA R, AYLLON MD, BRICEÑO J. Difficulty scores in laparoscopic liver surgery-getting closer to a powerful and necessary tool[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 2019, 8(4): 428-430. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.02.11.
    [22]
    IM C, CHO JY, HAN HS, et al. Validation of difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection in patients who underwent laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(1): 430-436. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4994-7.
    [23]
    LEE SY, GOH B, SEPIDEH G, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score-a validation study[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, 23(3): 545-555. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-4036-y.
    [24]
    XIA AD, WANG W, BAI G, et al. Practicability of surgical difficulty scoring model for laparoscopic liver resection[J/CD]. Chin J Laparoscopic Surgery (Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(3): 166-172. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.03.009.

    夏阿东, 王巍, 白光, 等. 腹腔镜肝切除评分模型可行性分析[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(3): 166-172. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.03.009.
    [25]
    YANG J, YANG Z, JIA G, et al. Clinical practicality study of the difficulty scoring systems DSS-B and DSS-ER in laparoscopic liver resection[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019, 29(1): 12-18. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0150.
    [26]
    RUSSOLILLO N, MAINA C, FLERES F, et al. Comparison and validation of three difficulty scoring systems in laparoscopic liver surgery: A retrospective analysis on 300 cases[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(12): 5484-5494. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07345-1.
    [27]
    RATTI F, D'ALESSANDRO V, CIPRIANI F, et al. Influence of body habitus on feasibility and outcome of laparoscopic liver resections: A prospective study[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2016, 23(6): 373-381. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.350.
    [28]
    TRIPKE V, HUBER T, MITTLER J, et al. Prediction of complexity and complications of laparoscopic liver surgery: The comparison of the Halls-score to the IWATE-score in 100 consecutive laparoscopic liver resections[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2020, 27(7): 380-387. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.731.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (429) PDF downloads(44) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
        

    The first journal specializing in hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases in China

    Supervisor：Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China

    Sponsor：Jilin University

    Academic Support: Chinese Society of Hepatology，Chinese Medical Association

    Address: 461 Xinjiang Road, Changchun

    Submit：0431-88782044

    Peer review：0431-88783542

    Email：lcgdb@vip.163.com

    About Journal

    Submission Guideline

    Journal Online

    Hepatobiliary College

    Guidelines

    YesterdayIP[]YesterdayPV[]TodayIP[]TodayPV[]Online[]

    Website Design © 2020 Editorial Board of Journal of Clinical Hepatology 吉ICP备10000617号-1 Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return