Objective To compare the levels of Golgi glycoprotein 73 (GP73) , alpha- fetoprotein heterogeneity 3 (AFP- L3) , alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) , and α- L- fucosidase (AFU) between patients with different liver diseases and the diagnostic value of any or a combination of these makers for liver cancer.Methods The 272 patients with liver cancer, 203 patients with liver cirrhosis, and 248 patients with chronic hepatitis admitted to our hospital from January to December, 2013, as well as 210 healthy individuals, were included in the study.Serum levels of GP73, AFP- L3, AFP, and AFU were determined.Comparison of non- normally distributed data was made by Kruskal- Wallis H test, and multiple comparisons were made by Mann- Whitney U test.Comparison of rates was made by chi- square test.P < 0.05 was considered significantly different.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn with healthy individuals and patients with chronic hepatitis or liver cirrhosis as controls, and Logistic fitting and ROC analysis were used to evaluate the diagnostic values of these markers.Results The GP73 level of liver cirrhosis group (177.0 (116.0, 247.0) ng /ml) was significantly higher than those of liver cancer group (141.0 (83.3, 218.8) ng /ml) and chronic hepatitis group (151.0 (83.0, 235.3) ng /ml) (U = 22 116.5 and 21 052.0, P<0.05 for both) .The AFP- L3 and AFP levels of liver cancer group (11.3 (4.3, 21.2) % and 78.4 (7.1, 2455.8) ng /ml) were significantly higher than those of liver cirrhosis group (6.0 (4.0, 8.0) % and 10.0 (3.8, 49.5) ng /ml) and chronic hepatitis group (7.0 (5.0, 9.0) % and 18.8 (4.4, 79.6) ng /ml) (U = 16009.0 /16083.5 and 22456.5 /22346.5, P < 0.05 for all) .According to the ROC curves drawn using healthy individuals as a control, the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) for GP73, AFP- L3, AFP, and AFU were 0.827, 0.817, 0.901, and 0.680, respectively;GP73, AFP- L3, and AFP had a higher diagnostic accuracy for liver cancer than AFU.According to the ROC curves drawn using non- liver cancer patients as a control, the AUCs for the four markers were 0.573, 0.734, 0.753, and 0.552, respectively;AFP- L3 and AFP had some diagnostic accuracy for liver cancer, and their cut- off values were 8.55% (56.6%, 84.9%) and 49.88 ng /ml (57.7%, 80.9%) , respectively, when the sensitivity and specificity reached the peak values.Conclusion Increased GP73 is related to hepatic impairment and chronic fibrosis, and it has a better sensitivity for the diagnosis of liver diseases.AFP- L3 and AFP have good specificity for the diagnosis of liver cancer, and a combination of the two markers can increase the diagnostic sensitivity for liver cancer to 62.1%.
[1] Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases and Parasitology, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association.Prevention and treatment of viral hepatitis[J].Chin J Infect Dis, 2001, 19 (1) :56-62. (in Chinese) 中华医学会传染病与寄生虫病学分会、肝病学分会.病毒性肝炎防治方案[J].传染病信息, 2001, 19 (1) :56-62.
|
[2]KLADNEY RD, BULLA GA, GUO L, et al.GP73, a novel Golgi-localized protein upregulated by viral infection[J].Gene, 2000, 249 (1) :53-65.
|
[3]SCHWEGLER EE, CAZARES L, STEEL LF, et al.SELDI-TOF MS profiling of serum for detection of the progression of chronic hepatitis C to hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Hepatology, 2005, 41 (3) :634-642.
|
[4]KONG XG, HAN SL, ZHENG ZM, et al.Diagnostic value of Golgi-localized protein73 combined with alpha-fetoprotein onprimary hepatic cancer[J].J Shandong Univ:Health Sciences, 2011, 49 (4) :110-114. (in Chinese) 孔祥亘, 韩绍磊, 郑昭敏, 等.高尔基体蛋白73联合甲胎蛋白异质体在原发性肝癌诊断中的价值[J].山东大学学报:医学版, 2011, 49 (4) :110-114.
|
[5]MAO YL, YANG HY, XU HF.Significance of Golgi glycoprotein73, a new tumor marker in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma:a primary study[J].Natl Med J China, 2008, 88 (14) :948-951. (in Chinese) 毛一雷, 杨华瑜, 徐海峰.新的肝癌血清标记物GP73在肝癌诊断中的初步研究[J].中华医学杂志, 2008, 88 (14) :948-951.
|
[6]IFTIKHAR R, KLADNEY RD, HAVLIOGLU N, et al.Disease-and cell-specific expression of GP73 in human liver disease[J].Am J Gastroenterol, 2004, 99 (6) :1087-1095.
|
[7]TIAN L, WANG Y, XU D, et al.Serological AFP/Golgi protein73could be a new diagnostic parameter of hepatic diseases[J].Int J Cancer, 2011, 129 (8) :1923-1931.
|
[8]LIU X, WAN X, LI Z, et al.Golgi protein 73 (GP73) , a useful serum marker in liver diseases[J].Clin Chem Lab Med, 2011, 49 (8) :1311-1316.
|
[9]CHOI JY, JUNG S W, KIM HY, et al.Diagnostic value of AFP-L3and PIVKA-II in hepatocellular carcinoma according to total-AFP[J].World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19 (3) :339.
|
[10]XU WF, FEI YM, ZHOU JK, et al.Diagnostic value of combined Detecton of GP73, AFP and AFP-L3[J].Chinese J Exp Clin Virol, 2011, 25 (4) :286-288. (in Chinese) 许文芳, 费迎明, 周建康, 等.血清GP73, AFP和AFP-L3联合检测在原发性肝癌诊断中的价值[J].中华实验和临床病毒学杂志, 2011, 25 (4) :286-288.
|
[11]ZHAO CH, ZHOU WF, CHEN WH, et al.Clinical significance ofα-fetoprotein initial diagnosis of primary hepatic cancer[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2013, 29 (9) :698-701. (in Chinese) 赵春华, 周文峰, 陈维华, 等.甲胎蛋白在原发性肝癌首诊中的价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2013, 29 (9) :698-701.
|
[12]WANG YM.Diagnostic value of primary liver cancer in the combined detection of AFU and AFP[J].Zhejiang Clin Med J, 2006, 8 (10) :1021-1022. (in Chinese) 王怡明.GGT, AFU和AFP联检在原发性肝癌中的诊断价值[J].浙江临床医学, 2006, 8 (10) :1021-1022.
|
[13]XU Y, CHEN MS, HAO XK.Clinical value of AFU, AFP tumor markers in diagnosing primary hepatic carcinoma[J].Chongqing Med, 2008, 37 (24) :2805-2806. (in Chinese) 徐焰, 陈名声, 郝晓柯.联合检测血清AFU, AFP肿瘤标志物在原发性肝癌诊断中的临床价值[J].重庆医学, 2008, 37 (24) :2805-2806.
|