Effects of laparoscopic retrograde cholecystectomy versus partial cholecystectomy in treatment of complex bile duct diseases: a comparative analysis

Ran JiangLin; Zhang ShaoMao; Wen Qiang

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.04.030

Issue 4

Apr. 2016

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of Clinical Hepatology > 2016 > 32(4): 750-753

PDF( 1648 KB)

Effects of laparoscopic retrograde cholecystectomy versus partial cholecystectomy in treatment of complex bile duct diseases: a comparative analysis

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.04.030

Department of General Surgery, Guangyuan Mental Health Center

Published Date: 2016-04-20

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect between laparoscopic retrograde cholecystectomy and partial cholecystectomy in the treatment of patients with complex bile duct diseases. Methods The clinical data of 83 patients with bile duct diseases who were diagnosed and treated in Guangyuan Mental Health Center from June 2013 to March 2015 were collected. Among these patients,40 underwent laparoscopic retrograde cholecystectomy( group A),and 43 underwent partial cholecystectomy( group B). The surgical procedure and postoperative recovery were compared between the two groups. The independent samples t- test was applied for comparison of continuous data between groups,and the paired t- test was applied for comparison of continuous data within each group before and after treatment; the chi- square test was applied for comparison of categorical data between groups. Results Compared with group A,group B had a significantly shorter time of operation,a significantly less blood loss,a significantly lower volume of intraoperative fluid infusion,and a significantly lower volume of peritoneal drainage( t = 9. 245,2. 394,2. 529,and 3. 603,all P < 0. 05). The rate of conversion to laparotomy,time to functional recovery of the gastrointestinal tract,and length of hospital stay showed no significant differences between the two groups( all P > 0. 05). The body temperature and C- reactive protein on days 1- 3 after surgery showed no significant differences between the two groups( all P >0. 05),while in both groups,the body temperature and C- reactive protein were significantly lower on the 2nd and 3rd days than on the 1st day.( t = 3. 184,3. 402,3. 151,3. 390,3. 497,5. 184,3. 916,and 6. 024,all P < 0. 05). Group B had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications than group A( 2. 33% vs 20. 00%,χ~2= 6. 696,P = 0. 010). Conclusion Compared with laparoscopic retrograde cholecystectomy,partial cholecystectomy can shorten the time of operation and reduce intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications,and holds promise for clinical application.
- biliary tract diseases,
- cholecystectomy,laparoscopic,
- therapy

FullText(HTML)

References(13)

References

[1]GUO SN,DUAN GY,WANG JT,et al.Comparison of sufentanil-tramadol PCIA between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gynecological laparoscopy[J].Chin J Surg,2015,53(2):150-154.(in Chinese)郭珊娜,段光友,王金韬,等.舒芬太尼配伍曲马多用于女性腹腔镜胆囊切除术和妇科腹腔镜手术术后自控静脉镇痛效果的比较[J].中华外科杂志,2015,53(2):150-154.

[2]ZHANG WZ,LIANG L,YAO BH.Current status of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in clinical practice and related concerns[J].Chin J Min Inv Surg,2015,15(4):366-367.(in Chinese)张文正,梁鲁,姚碧辉.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床现状及隐忧[J].中国微创外科杂志,2015,15(4):366-367.

[3]XUE J,HUANG XT,JING C,et al.Performance evaluation of medical service management based on clinical pathway management[J].China Med Herald,2015,12(5):153-155.(in Chinese)薛军,黄先涛,靖超,等.以临床路径管理为基础的医疗服务管理绩效评价[J].中国医药导报,2015,12(5):153-155.

[4] ZHONG WZ.Laparoscopic retrograde cholecystectomy and subtotal cholecystectomy in treatment of complex gallstones:a comparative analysis[J].Yanbian Med,2015,7:18-19.(in Chinese)钟维章.经腹腔镜逆行、次全胆囊切除术治疗复杂胆囊结石对比[J].延边医学,2015,7:18-19.

[5]MA SY.Efficacy of laparoscopy combined with duodenoscopy with different sequential orders in treatment of gallstones complicated by common bile duct stones:a comparative analysis[J].Mod Instrum Med Treat,2015,21(1):30-32.(in Chinese)马绍勇.腹腔镜联合十二指肠镜不同序贯次序治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石效果对比研究[J].现代仪器与医疗,2015,21(1):30-32.

[6]LAI W,DING GY,MENG HB,et al.Effects of ultrasoundguided improved subcostal transverse abdominis plane block on intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Mil Med J Southeast China,2015,17(1):32-34.(in Chinese)来伟,丁国友,孟海兵,等.超声引导改良肋缘下腹横肌阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术术中术后镇痛的影响[J].东南国防医药,2015,17(1):32-34.

[7]LI YW,LI WM,LIU HR.Efficacy of preventive endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage treatment on the bile duct stricture caused by laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Chin J Clin Gastroenterol,2015,27(2):65-66.(in Chinese)李一伟,李为民,刘浩润.内镜下胆道塑料支架置入术治疗腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管狭窄疗效观察[J].临床消化病杂志,2015,27(2):65-66.

[8]XU SX,DING YB.Advances in laparoscopy combined with endoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of gallstones complicated by common bile duct stones[J].Chin J Min Inv Surg,2015,15(4):376-379.(in Chinese)许松欣,丁岩冰.腹腔镜联合内镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的诊治进展[J].中国微创外科杂志,2015,15(4):376-379.

[9]YU W,YUAN HS,ZHENG JW,et al.Feasibility analysis of ER-CP combined with recent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of the biliary calculi[J/CD].Chin J Injury Repair and Wound Healing:Electronic Edition,2014,9(4):39-42.(in Chinese)俞巍,袁辉生,郑建伟,等.内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合近期腹腔镜胆囊切除治疗胆系结石的可行性分析与体会[J/CD].中华损伤与修复杂志:电子版,2014,9(4):39-42.

[10]SOUKUP ES,RUSSELL KW,METZGER R,et al.Treatment and outcome of traumatic biliary injuries in children[J].J Pediatr Surg,2014,49(2):345-348.

[11]YU XP,WU SD,YU H,et al.Two incision laparoscope combine cholecystoscope polypectomy with gallbladder preservation:a new technique for treatment of gallbladder polyps[J].Clin J Curr Adv Gen Surg,2015,18(1):26-29.(in Chinese)于晓鹏,吴硕东,于宏,等.腹腔镜联合胆囊镜两孔法保胆息肉摘除术40例[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2015,18(1):26-29.

[12]ANSELL J,WARREN N,WALL P,et al.Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery:a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study[J].Surg Endosc,2014,28(7):2057-2065.

[13]CHEN M.Clinical effects of double-mirror minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in treatment of gallstones complicated by common bile duct stones[J].Tianjin Med J,2012,40(10):1072-1073.(in Chinese)陈明.双镜微创与开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床研究[J].天津医药,2012,40(10):1072-1073.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(18)

1.	张巍，单勇，李源，董毅，张锦洲. 腹腔镜下逆行全胆囊切除术与次全胆囊切除术治疗复杂胆管病变的效果对比研究. 中外医疗. 2021(24): 62-64 .
2.	刘自超. 腹腔镜胆囊次全切术治疗急性复杂性胆囊炎患者的效果及安全性分析. 山西卫生健康职业学院学报. 2021(04): 52-54 .
3.	胡海中，纪刚. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的效果及对肝功能、免疫功能、炎症因子水平的影响. 中国医学创新. 2020(19): 30-34 .
4.	李荣霖. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜经胆囊管诊治的应用进展. 中国医疗器械信息. 2020(14): 33-34 .
5.	鲁宇宙. 复杂腹腔镜胆囊手术中胆囊部分切除术实施成效分析. 世界复合医学. 2019(01): 142-144 .
6.	彭晓容，王飘，蒋永梅，谢青云，李莉. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术后发生胆管损伤的危险因素分析. 解放军医药杂志. 2019(07): 68-71 .
7.	宋贺. 中药外治法在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后腹胀患者护理中的应用. 光明中医. 2019(22): 3512-3514 .
8.	侯晓倩. 温针灸疗法对胆囊切除术后胃肠功能恢复的影响. 长春中医药大学学报. 2018(02): 312-314 .
9.	郭延安. 腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗肝胆疾病的效果观察. 蛇志. 2018(01): 77-78 .
10.	张志友，刘文生，李鹰，章世海. 胆清胶囊联合熊去氧胆酸胶囊治疗保胆取石术后结石复发的临床效果. 中国医药导报. 2018(32): 121-124 .
11.	陈启念. 比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与开腹胆囊切除术(OC)对机体应激和免疫功能的影响. 临床医药文献电子杂志. 2018(83): 75-76 .
12.	金明明. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术胆管损伤的相关危险因素分析. 临床医学. 2017(09): 79-81 .
13.	魏建文. 腔镜下行胆囊切除术应用效果及对胃肠激素分泌和并发症情况的影响. 中国全科医学. 2017(S3): 22-24 .
14.	徐鸿儒，刘辉，叶小汉，理建华. 不同胆囊切除术对胆结石治疗效果分析. 现代诊断与治疗. 2017(12): 2161-2162 .
15.	王继卫. 腹腔镜下逆行和次全胆囊切除术对复杂胆囊患者的疗效比较. 湖北科技学院学报(医学版). 2017(02): 133-135 .
16.	谢世华，刘志文，周告生，郭昌文. 腹腔镜逆行次全胆囊切除术治疗慢性结石性胆囊炎的效果分析. 中国当代医药. 2017(17): 39-41 .
17.	付小红. 腹腔镜下全子宫切除术对患者的治疗效果及胃肠道功能恢复的影响. 中国当代医药. 2017(35): 71-73 .
18.	谢永灿，罗海军，邢专. 腹腔镜逆行胆囊切除与次全胆囊切除治疗复杂性胆囊结石的疗效观察. 微创医学. 2016(05): 770-771+812 .

Other cited types(2)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (2186) PDF downloads(406)

Effects of laparoscopic retrograde cholecystectomy versus partial cholecystectomy in treatment of complex bile duct diseases: a comparative analysis

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.04.030