中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 37 Issue 10
Oct.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Value of SpyGlass single-operator choledochoscopy system in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with biliary tract diseases

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.10.027
Research funding:

Key Projects of Nanjing Medical University (2017NJMUZD03)

  • Received Date: 2021-02-27
  • Accepted Date: 2021-05-07
  • Published Date: 2021-10-20
  •   Objective  To investigate the value of SpyGlass single-operator choledochoscopy system in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with unexplained biliary stricture, complex bile duct stones, or other biliary tract diseases.  Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of the patients with biliary tract diseases who were diagnosed and treated with SpyGlass in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from December 2017 to June 2020. For the patients with biliary stricture, the biliary lesions were fully visualized under the guidance of SpyGlass, and SpyBite biopsy was performed if necessary; the patients with bile duct stones were treated with SpyGlass-guided direct-view laser lithotripsy; for the patients with gallbladder disease, the cystic duct was superselected with the assistance of SpyGlass. The SpyGlass system was analyzed in terms of its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rate in diagnosis and treatment, lithotripsy success rate, stone clearance rate, procedure success rate, and incidence rate of complications.  Results  A total of 58 patients underwent SpyGlass procedure. SpyGlass was used to evaluate biliary stricture of unknown nature in 44 (76%) patients; SpyGlass visual impression had a diagnostic sensitivity of 92% (24/26), a specificity of 94% (17/18), and an accuracy of 93% (41/44), and SpyBite biopsy had a diagnostic sensitivity of 71% (15/21), a specificity of 92% (11/12), and an accuracy of 79% (26/33). SpyGlass was used for the treatment of bile duct stones in 8 patients (14%), with a lithotripsy success rate of 83% (5/6) and a stone clearance rate of 88% (7/8). A guide wire under the SpyGlass system was to superselect the cystic duct in 5 patients (9%), with a procedure success rate of 80% (4/5). In one patient (1%), SpyGlass was used to assist the removal of common bile duct stones after liver transplantation and the treatment of bile duct anastomotic stricture. A total of 5 patients (9%) experienced complications after surgery.  Conclusion  The SpyGlass choledochoscopy system is accurate, safe, and effective in the diagnosis and treatment of unexplained biliary stricture, complex bile duct stones, and other biliary tract diseases.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    CHEN YK. Preclinical characterization of the Spyglass peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for direct access, visualization, and biopsy[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2007, 65(2): 303-311. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.07.048.
    [2]
    DERDEYN J, LALEMAN W. Current role of endoscopic cholangioscopy[J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2018, 34(5): 301-308. DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000457.
    [3]
    XU W, MIAO L, WANG ZF, et al. Application of SpyGlassTM DS Direct Visualization System in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract diseases[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2020, 36(11): 2626-2629. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.11.052.

    徐雯, 苗龙, 王正峰, 等. SpyGlassTM DS直视化系统在胆道疾病诊疗中的应用[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(11): 2626-2629. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.11.052.
    [4]
    KARAGYOZOV P, BOEVA I, TISHKOV I. Role of digital single-operator cholangioscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary disorders[J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2019, 11(1): 31-40. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i1.31.
    [5]
    YODICE M, CHOMA J, TADROS M. The expansion of cholangioscopy: Established and investigational uses of SpyGlass in biliary and pancreatic disorders[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2020, 10(3): 132. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10030132.
    [6]
    NAVANEETHAN U, NJEI B, LOURDUSAMY V, et al. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015, 81(1): 168-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.017.
    [7]
    SHAH RJ, RAIJMAN I, BRAUER B, et al. Performance of a fully disposable, digital, single-operator cholangiopancreatoscope[J]. Endoscopy, 2017, 49(7): 651-658. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-106295.
    [8]
    TUROWSKI F, HVGLE U, DORMANN A, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy with SpyGlassDSTM: Results of a multicenter retrospective cohort study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(9): 3981-3988. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6141-0.
    [9]
    LENZE F, BOKEMEYER A, GROSS D, et al. Safety, diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy of digital single-operator cholangioscopy[J]. United European Gastroenterol J, 2018, 6(6): 902-909. DOI: 10.1177/2050640618764943.
    [10]
    SUN X, ZHOU Z, TIAN J, et al. Is single-operator peroral cholangioscopy a useful tool for the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary lesion? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015, 82(1): 79-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.021.
    [11]
    NAVANEETHAN U, HASAN MK, LOURDUSAMY V, et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy and targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures: A systematic review[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015, 82(4): 608-614. e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.030.
    [12]
    de OLIVEIRA P, DE MOURA D, RIBEIRO IB, et al. Efficacy of digital single-operator cholangioscopy in the visual interpretation of indeterminate biliary strictures: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(8): 3321-3329. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07583-8.
    [13]
    YASUDA I, ITOI T. Recent advances in endoscopic management of difficult bile duct stones[J]. Dig Endosc, 2013, 25(4): 376-385. DOI: 10.1111/den.12118.
    [14]
    RAMCHANDANI M, REDDY DN, LAKHTAKIA S, et al. Per oral cholangiopancreatoscopy in pancreatico biliary diseases-expert consensus statements[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(15): 4722-4734. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4722.
    [15]
    BREWER GUTIERREZ OI, BEKKALI N, RAIJMAN I, et al. Efficacy and safety of digital single-operator cholangioscopy for difficult biliary stones[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 16(6): 918-926. e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.017.
    [16]
    ALJEBREEN AM, ALHARBI OR, AZZAM N, et al. Efficacy of spyglass-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy in difficult bile duct stones[J]. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(6): 366-370. DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.145329.
    [17]
    ABURAJAB M, DUA K. Endoscopic management of difficult bile duct stones[J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2018, 20(2): 8. DOI: 10.1007/s11894-018-0613-1.
    [18]
    BOKEMEYER A, GERGES C, LANG D, et al. Digital single-operator video cholangioscopy in treating refractory biliary stones: A multicenter observational study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(5): 1914-1922. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06962-0.
    [19]
    SETHI A, CHEN YK, AUSTIN GL, et al. ERCP with cholangiopancreatoscopy may be associated with higher rates of complications than ERCP alone: A single-center experience[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011, 73(2): 251-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.058.
    [20]
    NGUYEN NQ. Getting most out of SpyGlass cholangio-pancreatoscopy: How and when?[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2012, 27(8): 1263-1265. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07178.x.
    [21]
    LALEMAN W, VERRAES K, VAN STEENBERGEN W, et al. Usefulness of the single-operator cholangioscopy system SpyGlass in biliary disease: A single-center prospective cohort study and aggregated review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(5): 2223-2232. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5221-2.
    [22]
    NJEI B, MCCARTY TR, VARADARAJULU S, et al. Cost utility of ERCP-based modalities for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2017, 85(4): 773-781. e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.020.
    [23]
    ANG TL, KWEK A. Safety and efficacy of SpyGlass cholangiopancreatoscopy in routine clinical practice in a regional Singapore hospital[J]. Singapore Med J, 2019, 60(10): 538-544. DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2018158.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1221) PDF downloads(52) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return