中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R

Value of platelet count and gallbladder wall thickness in predicting esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.12.015
Research funding:

 

  • Received Date: 2019-07-15
  • Published Date: 2019-12-20
  • Objective To investigate the value of platelet count( PLT) and gallbladder wall thickness( GBWT) in predicting esophageal varices( EV) in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 100 patients who were diagnosed with hepatitis B cirrhosis in Xingtai People's Hospital from January 2018 to January 2019,and according to the results of gastroscopy as the gold standard for EV,these patients were divided into non-EV group with 50 patients and EV group with 50 patients. All patients underwent abdominal ultrasound( including GBWT,portal vein diameter,and spleen length),gastroscopy,and serological examination. The independent samples t-test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between groups,and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between groups. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the noninvasive indices for predicting EV in liver cirrhosis. The receiver operating characteristic( ROC) curve was used to compare the diagnostic efficiency of a single index and combined indices. Results Compared with the non-EV group,the EV group had significantly higher GBWT,portal vein diameter,and spleen length( Z =-6. 251 and-2. 611,t =-3. 657,all P < 0. 01) and significantly lower PLT,PGR,and PLT-to-spleen length ratio( Z =-5. 403,-7. 018,and-6. 015,all P < 0. 001). At the optimal cut-off value of 0. 44 cm,GBWT had an area under the ROC curve( AUC) of 0. 861( 95% confidence interval: 0. 784-0. 938),a sensitivity of 0. 76,a specificity of 0. 86,a positive predictive value of 0. 86,and a negative predictive value of 0. 78 in the diagnosis of EV in hepatitis B cirrhosis. In the diagnosis of EV,PGR had an AUC of 0. 907,a sensitivity of 0. 90,a specificity of 0. 82,a positive predictive value of 0. 91,and a negative predictive value of 0. 84; in the diagnosis of high-risk EV,PGR had an AUC of 0. 823,a sensitivity of0. 68,a specificity of 0. 88,a positive predictive value of 0. 89,and a negative predictive value of 0. 86. With the criteria of GBWT < 0. 47 cm and PLT≥83 × 109/L,46% of all patients( 46/100) had no need for gastroscopy at the moment. Conclusion GBWT is expected to become a new index for predicting EV. Hepatitis B cirrhosis patients with GBWT < 0. 47 cm and PLT≥83 × 109/L have a low probability ofEV,and thus it is recommended to postpone gastroscopy. The combination of these two noninvasive indices can provide a simple preliminary screening tool for clinicians to rule out esophageal varices in cirrhosis.

     

  • [1] FORTUNE BE,GARCIA-TSAO G,CIARLEGLIO M,et al.Child-Turcotte-Pugh class is best at stratifying risk in variceal hemorrhage:Analysis of a US multicenter prospective study[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol,2017,51(5):446-453.
    [2] TANDON P,BISHAY K,FISHER S,et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between variceal and non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2018,33(10):1773-1779.
    [3] ZHOU JM,BAN ZC,LI Y,et al. Value of liver stiffnessspleen diameter-to-platelet ratio score in predicting esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2018,34(11):2341-2344.(in Chinese)周佳美,班志超,李艳,等.肝硬度×脾脏直径/血小板评分对肝硬化食管静脉曲张的预测价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2018,34(11):2341-2344.
    [4] CHEN M,ZHANG DK,GAO YJ,et al. Clinical value of acoustic radiation force impulse in quantitative prediction of the degree of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2018,34(1):80-83.(in Chinese)陈敏,张大鹍,皋月娟,等.声辐射力脉冲成像技术定量测量肝硬化食管静脉曲张程度的临床价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2018,34(1):80-83.
    [5] WANG B,NIU JQ. Association of platelet count,fibrosis-4,and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index with the development and severity of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2018,34(1):84-88.(in Chinese)王报,牛俊奇.PLT计数、FIB-4、APRI与肝硬化食管静脉曲张发生及严重程度的相关性分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2018,34(1):84-88.
    [6] TSAKNAKIS B,MASRI R,AMANZAD A,et al. Gall bladder wall thickening as noninvasive screening parameter for esophageal varices-a comparative endoscopic–sonographic study[J]. BMC Gastroenterology,2018,18:123-129.
    [7] Chinese Society of Hepatology and Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases,Chinese Medical Association. The guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B:A 2015 update[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2015,31(12):1941-1960.(in Chinese)中华医学会肝病学分会,中华医学会感染病学分会.慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2015年更新版)[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2015,31(12):1941-1960.
    [8] Chinese Society of Hepatology,Chinese Medical Association,Chinese Society of Gastroenteroloyg,Chinese Medical Association; Chinese Society of Enoscopy,Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding in cirrhotic portal hypertension[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2016,32(2):203-219.(in Chinese)中华医学会肝病学分会,中华医学会消化病学分会,中华医学会内镜学分会.肝硬化门静脉高压食管胃静脉曲张出血的防治指南[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2016,32(2):203-219.
    [9] AUGUSTIN S,PONS M,MAURICE JB,et al. Expanding the Baveno VI criteria for the screening of varices in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease[J]. Hepatology,2017,66(6):1980-1988.
    [10] GIANNINI E,BOTTA F,BORRO P,et al. Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio:Proposal and validation of a non-invasive parameter to predict the presence of oesophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Gut,2003,52(8):1200-1205.
    [11] de FRANCHIS R,Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension:Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop:Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension[J]. J Hepatol,2015,63(3):743-752.
    [12] QI X,AN W,LIU F,et al. Virtual hepatic venous pressure gradient with CT angiography(CHESS 1601):A prospective multicenter study for the noninvasive diagnosis of portal hypertension[J]. Radiology,2019,290(2):370-377.
    [13] PETZOLD G,TSAKNAKIS B,BREMER S,et al. Evaluation of liver stiffness by 2D-SWE in combination with non-invasive parameters as predictors for esophageal varices in patients with advanced chronic liver disease[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol,2019,54(3):342-349.
    [14] KONTUREK JW,KONTUREK SJ,PAWLIK T,et al. Physiological role of nitric oxide in gallbladder emptying in men[J]. Digestion,1997,58(4):373-378.
    [15] WANG TF,HWANG SJ,LEE EY,et al. Gallbladder wall thickening in patients with cirrhosis[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol,1997,12(6):445-449.
    [16] LI C,YANG ZG,MA ES,et al. Analysis of the correlation between the degree of GBWT and hemodynamic changes of portal vein system[J]. J Bio Med Eng,2010,27(3):583-586.(in Chinese)李琛,杨志刚,马恩森,等.肝硬化失代偿患者胆囊壁增厚与门静脉系统血流动力学改变的相关性探讨[J].生物医学工程学杂志,2010,27(3):583-586.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 王俊超,汤书豪,方心怡,易根发. 血栓弹力图在肝硬化患者中的应用研究进展. 现代消化及介入诊疗. 2024(10): 1236-1240 .
    2. 张大鹍,史晓娟,王瑞芳,陈敏. 声辐射力脉冲成像联合血小板计数预测慢性乙型病毒性肝炎肝硬化食管静脉曲张的价值. 临床超声医学杂志. 2022(01): 17-20 .
    3. 何雨倩,曾伊凡,马德强,陈悦. 肝硬化患者食管胃底静脉曲张无创评估的研究进展. 中西医结合肝病杂志. 2022(04): 381-384 .
    4. 丁敏,刘庭玮,张立波,陈鸿鑫,祁兴顺. 常见肝良性疾病造成胆囊形态改变机制、影像学评估及意义. 临床军医杂志. 2022(09): 887-889+893 .
    5. 裴德翠,文思思,胡海春,郑秀霞,李林飞,邓杰文. 血栓弹力图对肝硬化患者自发性出血风险的评估价值. 临床肝胆病杂志. 2021(07): 1582-1588 . 本站查看
    6. 周胜云,段志辉. 肝硬化食管静脉曲张的无创诊断. 临床肝胆病杂志. 2020(08): 1842-1846 . 本站查看
    7. 林小钰,胡晓敏,陈永鹏. 无创肝纤维化指标对肝硬化患者高风险胃食管静脉曲张的预测价值. 临床肝胆病杂志. 2020(08): 1742-1746 . 本站查看
    8. 何伟锋,吴少彬,万婷. 乙肝肝硬化患者体成分分析在评估患者预后及生存率中的应用价值. 临床医学研究与实践. 2020(27): 122-124 .

    Other cited types(12)

  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1491) PDF downloads(277) Cited by(20)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return