中文｜English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 36 Issue 11
Nov.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Clinical Hepatology  > 2020  >  36(11): 2494-2499

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation alone versus endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with large balloon dilation in treatment of large common bile duct stones:A Meta-analysis

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.11.019

  • Guizhou Medical University

  • Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Bijie First People's Hospital

  • Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University

  • Received Date: 2020-04-11
  • Published Date: 2020-11-20
    Abstract

  • Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation( EPLBD) versus endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with large balloon dilation( ESBD) in the treatment of large common bile duct stones( ≥10 mm). Methods Pubmed,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,Wanfang Data,and VIP were searched for related articles published up to March 2020.Two reviewers independently performed article screening,data extraction,and quality assessment,and RevMan 5. 3 software was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 11 studies( 6 randomized controlled trials and 5 non-randomized controlled trials) were included,with 1282 patients in total. The meta-analysis showed that in the 6 randomized controlled trials,there were no significant differences between the EPLBD group and the ESBD group in initial stone clearance rate( odds ratio [OR]= 0. 71,95% confidence interval [CI]: 0. 45-1. 12,P = 0. 14),overall stone clearance rate( OR = 1. 39,95% CI: 0. 65-2. 96,P = 0. 39),rate of use of mechanical lithotripsy( OR =1. 19,95% CI: 0. 75-1. 89,P = 0. 46),and incidence rate of early complications( OR = 1. 10,95% CI: 0. 60-2. 03,P = 0. 75); in the5 non-randomized controlled trials,there were no significant differences between the EPLBD group and the ESBD group in initial stone clearance rate( OR = 0. 64,95% CI: 0. 35-1. 15,P = 0. 13),overall stone clearance rate( OR = 0. 46,95% CI: 0. 19-1. 12,P =0. 09),and incidence rate of early complications( OR = 1. 20,95% CI: 0. 65-2. 21,P = 0. 56),but the EPLBD group had a significantly higher rate of use of mechanical lithotripsy than the ESBD group( OR = 1. 96,95% CI: 1. 26-3. 05,P = 0. 003). Conclusion EPLBD and ESBD have similar efficacy and safety in the treatment of large common bile duct stones,while EPLBD may increase the risk of the use of mechanical lithotripsy. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(33)
  • [1] ERCP group,Chinese Society of Digestive Endoscopology;Biliopancreatic group,Chinese Association of Gastroenterologist and hepatologist,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases. Chinese Guidelines for ERCP(2018)[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2018,34(12):2537-2554.(in Chinese)中华医学会消化内镜学分会ERCP学组，中国医师协会消化医师分会胆胰学组，国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心．中国经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术指南(2018版)[J]．临床肝胆病杂志，2018,34(12):2537-2554.
    [2] FREEMAN ML,NELSON DB,SHERMAN S,et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy[J]. N Engl J Med,1996,335(13):909-918.
    [3] DISARIO JA,FREEMAN ML,BJORKMAN DJ,et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones[J]. Gastroenterology,2004,127(5):1291-1299.
    [4] ERSOZ G,TEKESIN O,OZUTEMIZ AO,et al. Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2003,57(2):156-159.
    [5] ATTASARANYA S,CHEON YK,VITTAL H,et al. Large-diameter biliary orifice balloon dilation to aid in endoscopic bile duct stone removal:A multicenter series[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2008,67(7):1046-1052.
    [6] HEO JH,KANG DH,JUNG HJ,et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile-duct stones[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2007,66(4):720-726; quiz 768,771.
    [7] ITOI T,ITOKAWA F,SOFUNI A,et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with large balloon dilation can reduce the procedure time and fluoroscopy time for removal of large bile duct stones[J]. Am J Gastroenterol,2009,104(3):560-565.
    [8] HE YF,TANG SH,GUO WW,et al. Efficacy and safety of minor endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in treatment of elderly patients with multiple large common bile duct stones[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2018,34(2):341-345.(in Chinese)贺永锋，汤善宏，郭文伟，等．内镜下乳头括约肌小切开联合大球囊扩张治疗老年胆总管多发巨大结石的效果及安全性分析[J]．临床肝胆病杂志，2018,34(2):341-345.
    [9] ATTAM R,FREEMAN ML. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large common bile duct stones[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg,2009,16(5):618-623.
    [10] WANG GX,XU MD,ZHOU PH,et al. Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with large-balloon dilation and endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone in removal of large bile duct stones[J]. Chin J Dig Endosc,2018,35(8):567-570.(in Chinese)王国祥，徐美东，周平红，等．内镜下乳头括约肌切开联合大球囊扩张术与单用大球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石的对比研究[J]．中华消化内镜杂志，2018,35(8):567-570.
    [11] PARK JS,JEONG S,LEE DK,et al. Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of large bile duct stones[J]. Endoscopy,2019,51(2):125-132.
    [12] KUO CM,CHIU YC,LIANG CM,et al. The efficacy of limited endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of large bile duct stones[J]. BMC Gastroenterol,2019,19(1):93.
    [13] COTTON PB,LEHMAN G,VENNES J,et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management:An attempt at consensus[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,1991,37(3):383-393.
    [14] HIGGINS JPT,GREEN S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5. 1. 0[updated March 2011][M/OL]. The Cochrane Collaboration,2011. www. cochranehandbook. org,2011.
    [15] WELLS GA,SHEA B,O’CONNELL D,et al.(2003)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS)for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses[EB/OL].[2012-05-05]. http://wwwohrica/programs/clinicalepidemiology/oxfordasp
    [16] HIGGINS JPT,THOMPSON SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis[J]. Stat Med,2002,21(11):1539-1558.
    [17] HIGGINS JP,THOMPSON SG,DEEKS JJ,et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses[J]. BMJ, 2003, 327(7414):557-560.
    [18] CHEON YK,LEE TY,KIM SN,et al. Impact of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation on sphincter of Oddi function:A prospective randomized study[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2017,85(4):782-790. e1.
    [19] CHU X,ZHANG H,QU R,et al. Small endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation in the treatment of patients with large bile duct stones[J].European surgery-acta chirurgica austriaca,2017,49(1):9-16.
    [20] EL WAKIL MR,ABDELKADER NA,HEL-D S,et al. Different techniques for management of common bile duct stones:A single centre experience[J]. J Egypt Soc Parasitol,2014,44(3):539-546.
    [21] GUO Y,LEI S,GONG W,et al. A preliminary comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy,endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation,and combination of the two in endoscopic choledocholithiasis treatment[J]. Med Sci Monit,2015,21:2607-2612.
    [22] HWANG JC,KIM JH,LIM SG,et al. Endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone versus endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation for the treatment of large bile duct stones[J]. BMC Gastroenterol,2013,13:15.
    [23] KOGURE H,TSUJINO T,ISAYAMA H,et al. Short-and longterm outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol,2014,49(1):121-128.
    [24] LI QL,GAO WD,ZHANG C,et al. Is endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation a better option than endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone in removal of large bile duct stones? A retrospective comparison study[J]. Indian J Cancer,2015,51(Suppl 2):e13-e17.
    [25] OKUNO M,IWASHITA T,YOSHIDA K,et al. Significance of endoscopic sphincterotomy preceding endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in the management of bile duct stones[J]. Dig Dis Sci,2016,61(2):597-602.
    [26] WEI YJ,WANG C,WANG G,et al. Safety evaluation of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large bile duct stones[J]. J Hepatobiliary Surg,2019,27(2):99-103.(in Chinese)魏亚军，王成，王刚，等．内镜下单纯大柱状球囊扩张术治疗胆总管内大结石的安全评价[J]．肝胆外科杂志，2019,27(2):99-103.
    [27] LIU P,LIN H,CHEN Y,et al. Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with and without a prior endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of patients with large and/or multiple common bile duct stones:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag,2019,15:91-101.
    [28] KIM JH,YANG MJ,HWANG JC,et al. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the removal of bile duct stones[J].World J Gastroenterol,2013,19(46):8580-8594.
    [29] LEUNG JW,TU R. Mechanical lithotripsy for large bile duct stones[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2004,59(6):688-690.
    [30] HINTZE RE,ADLER A,VELTZKE W. Outcome of mechanical lithotripsy of bile duct stones in an unselected series of 704 patients[J]. Hepatogastroenterology,1996,43(9):473-476.
    [31] YOUN YH,LIM HC,JAHNG JH,et al. The increase in balloon size to over 15 mm does not affect the development of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation for bile duct stone removal[J]. Dig Dis Sci,2011,56(5):1572-1577.
    [32] AIURA K,KITAGAWA Y. Current status of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of bile duct stones[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci,2011,18(3):339-345.
    [33] WANG JM,REN WR,MENG X,et al. Research advances in the impairment of Oddi sphincter function caused by endoscopic sphincterotomy[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2020,36(2):468-471.(in Chinese)王军民，任威瑞，孟霞，等．内镜下乳头括约肌切开术致Oddi括约肌功能损伤的研究现状[J]．临床肝胆病杂志，2020,36(2):468-471.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (4445) PDF downloads(86) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
        

    The first journal specializing in hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases in China

    Supervisor：Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China

    Sponsor：Jilin University

    Academic Support: Chinese Society of Hepatology，Chinese Medical Association

    Address: 461 Xinjiang Road, Changchun

    Submit：0431-88782044

    Peer review：0431-88783542

    Email：lcgdb@vip.163.com

    About Journal

    Submission Guideline

    Journal Online

    Hepatobiliary College

    Guidelines

    YesterdayIP[]YesterdayPV[]TodayIP[]TodayPV[]Online[]

    Website Design © 2020 Editorial Board of Journal of Clinical Hepatology 吉ICP备10000617号-1 Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return