中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 40 Issue 6
Jun.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Predictive value of continuous monitoring of indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes combined with standard residual liver volume for hepatic insufficiency in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after partial hepatectomy

DOI: 10.12449/JCH240615
Research funding:

Tianjin Health Bureau Science and Technology Fund Key Project (2013KR05);

Tianjin Health Bureau Key Support Project (2014KR08)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: ZHANG Yamin, zhangyamin@163.com (ORCID: 0000-0001-7886-2901)
  • Received Date: 2023-03-16
  • Accepted Date: 2023-07-04
  • Published Date: 2024-06-25
  •   Objective  To investigate the value of continuous monitoring of indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes (ICG-R15) combined with standard residual liver volume (SRLV) in predicting hepatic insufficiency after partial hepatectomy.  Methods  Clinical data and SRLV data were collected from 70 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were admitted to Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, from November 2016 to May 2017. According to the presence or absence of hepatic insufficiency after surgery, the patients were divided into good liver function group with 56 patients and hepatic insufficiency group with 14 patients. Based on preoperative liver function evaluation and contrast-enhanced CT scans, resected liver volume and residual liver volume were calculated, and three-dimensional reconstruction of the liver was performed. Intraoperative ultrasound localization was performed to determine the surgical regimen, and selective hepatic inflow occlusion or intermittent hepatic portal occlusion was selected based on intraoperative conditions. CUSA combined with BIPOLAR drip electric coagulation forceps were used for the partition of liver parenchyma. SRLV was calculated, and ICG-R15 was monitored continuously. The independent-samples t test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups; the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to investigate the accuracy in predicting hepatic insufficiency after surgery. A multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to establish a predictive model for postoperative hepatic insufficiency, and diagnostic criteria were developed for SLRV combined with postoperative ICG-R15 dynamic monitoring in the diagnosis of postoperative hepatic insufficiency.  Results  There were significant differences between the two groups in ICG-R15 before surgery, immediately after surgery, and on days 3 and 5 after surgery, as well as significant differences in SRLV and Child class (all P<0.05). The incidence rate of postoperative hepatic insufficiency increased with the increase in ICG-R15 before surgery, immediately after surgery, and on days 3 and 5 after surgery (all P<0.001). Further comparison between two groups showed that there was a significant difference in the incidence rate of hepatic insufficiency between the ICG-R15>20% group and the other two groups before surgery, immediately after surgery, and on days 3 and 5 after surgery (all P<0.001), and there was a significant difference in the incidence rate of hepatic insufficiency between the ICG-R15<10% group and the 10%≤ICG-R15≤20% group immediately after surgery (P<0.001). ICG-R15 before surgery, ICG-R15 immediately after surgery, ICG-R15 on day 3 after surgery, and ICG-R15 on day 5 after surgery had an AUC of 0.790, 0.857, 0.855, and 0.870, respectively, in predicting postoperative hepatic insufficiency, and ICG-R15 immediately after surgery and on days 3 and 5 after surgery had a significantly larger AUC than ICG-R15 before surgery (all P<0.05). The multivariate analysis showed that increases in SRLV and postoperative ICG-R15 dynamic monitoring (immediately after surgery and on days 3 and 5 after surgery) were independent risk factors for postoperative hepatic insufficiency, while increased body mass index before surgery was an independent protective factor (all P<0.05). A multivariate Logistic regression predictive model was established and was used to predict hepatic insufficiency after surgery (immediately after surgery and on days 3 and 5 after surgery), and the ROC curve analysis showed that the model had an AUC of 0.963, 0.967, and 0.967, respectively, in predicting hepatic insufficiency immediately after surgery and on days 3 and 5 after surgery (all P<0.01). Diagnostic criteria were developed for SLRV combined with postoperative ICG-R15 dynamic monitoring in the diagnosis of postoperative hepatic insufficiency, i.e., SLRV>1 240 mL/m2, ICG-R15>20% immediately after surgery, or ICG-R15>25% on day 3 or 5 after surgery, and postoperative hepatic insufficiency could be diagnosed if a patient met any one criterion. These diagnostic criteria had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 60.71%, and a conformity degree of 68.57%.  Conclusion  Continuous monitoring of ICG-R15 before and after surgery is of guiding significance for predicting postoperative hepatic insufficiency, and ICG-R15 on day 5 after surgery has the highest accuracy. SRLV combined with postoperative ICG-R15 dynamic monitoring can effectively predict the onset of hepatic insufficiency after hepatectomy and can guide clinicians to predict the onset of postoperative hepatic insufficiency in patients with liver cancer and perform clinical intervention as soon as possible.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    RAHBARI NN, GARDEN OJ, PADBURY R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: A definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery(ISGLS)[J]. Surgery, 2011, 149( 5): 713- 724. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001.
    [2]
    HAEGELE S, REITER S, WANEK D, et al. Perioperative non-invasive indocyanine green-clearance testing to predict postoperative outcome after liver resection[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11( 11): e0165481. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165481.
    [3]
    DU ZG, LI B, FENG X, et al. Combined indocyanine green test and standard remnant liver volume to predict post-hepatectomy hepatic insufficiency for the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chin J Surg, 2010, 48( 3): 189- 192. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2010.03.010.

    杜正贵, 李波, 冯曦, 等. 吲哚氰绿排泄试验及标准余肝体积与肝癌切除术后肝功能不全的相关性研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2010, 48( 3): 189- 192. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2010.03.010.
    [4]
    DONG JH, ZHENG SS, CHEN XP, et al. Consensus on evaluation of hepatic functional reserve before hepatectomy(2011 edition)[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2011, 10( 1): 20- 25. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2011.01.006.

    董家鸿, 郑树森, 陈孝平, 等. 肝切除术前肝脏储备功能评估的专家共识(2011版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2011, 10( 1): 20- 25. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2011.01.006.
    [5]
    XU LN, XU YY, GAO DW. Impact of operative and peri-operative factors on the long-term prognosis of primary liver cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy[J]. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2016, 36( 4): 523- 528. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-016-1619-2.
    [6]
    TAKAHASHI K, KUROKAWA T, OSHIRO Y, et al. Postoperative decrease in platelet counts is associated with delayed liver function recovery and complications after partial hepatectomy[J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2016, 239( 1): 47- 55. DOI: 10.1620/tjem.239.47.
    [7]
    LIU Y, CHEN ZL, YU XX, et al. Risk factors for hepatic insufficiency after major hepatectomy in non-cirrhotic patients[J]. Asian J Surg, 2021, 44( 10): 1324- 1325. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.06.046.
    [8]
    APERS T, HENDRIKX B, BRACKE B, et al. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy with hepatic vein resection and reconstruction[J]. Acta Chir Belg, 2022, 122( 5): 334- 340. DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2021.1915021.
    [9]
    SØREIDE JA, DESHPANDE R. Post hepatectomy liver failure(PHLF)-Recent advances in prevention and clinical management[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2021, 47( 2): 216- 224. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.001.
    [10]
    HAYASHI H, BEPPU T, OKABE H, et al. Functional assessment versus conventional volumetric assessment in the prediction of operative outcomes after major hepatectomy[J]. Surgery, 2015, 157( 1): 20- 26. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.013.
    [11]
    MOON YJ, KIM SH, KIM JW, et al. Comparison of postoperative coagulation profiles and outcome for sugammadex versus pyridostigmine in 992 living donors after living-donor hepatectomy[J]. Medicine, 2018, 97( 11): e0129. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010129.
    [12]
    DE RUDDER M, DILI A, STÄRKEL P, et al. Critical role of LSEC in post-hepatectomy liver regeneration and failure[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22( 15): 8053. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22158053.
    [13]
    ZHANG ZM, OUYANG GX, WANG P, et al. Safe standard remnant liver volume after hepatectomy in HCC patients in different stages of hepatic fibrosis[J]. BMC Surg, 2021, 21( 1): 57. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01065-x.
    [14]
    YOSHIDA M, SHIRAISHI S, SAKAMOTO F, et al. Assessment of hepatic functional regeneration after hepatectomy using(99m)Tc-GSA SPECT/CT fused imaging[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2014, 28( 8): 780- 788. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-014-0872-3.
    [15]
    FUNG J, POON RTP, YU WC, et al. Use of liver stiffness measurement for liver resection surgery: Correlation with indocyanine green clearance testing and post-operative outcome[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8( 8): e72306. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072306.
    [16]
    CHEN ZS, LIN KC, LIU JF. Application of three-dimensional visualization in surgical operation for primary liver cancer[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2022, 38( 3): 505- 509. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.03.003.

    陈昭硕, 林科灿, 刘景丰. 三维可视化技术在原发性肝癌外科手术中的应用[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38( 3): 505- 509. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.03.003.
    [17]
    BOWEN SR, CHAPMAN TR, BORGMAN J, et al. Measuring total liver function on sulfur colloid SPECT/CT for improved risk stratification and outcome prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma patients[J]. EJNMMI Res, 2016, 6( 1): 57. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-016-0212-9.
    [18]
    ETRA JW, SQUIRES MH 3rd, FISHER SB, et al. Early identification of patients at increased risk for hepatic insufficiency, complications and mortality after major hepatectomy[J]. HPB, 2014, 16( 10): 875- 883. DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12270.
    [19]
    GAO YY, ZHANG X, LI FH, et al. Measurement of glycosylated albumin and its application value in liver cirrhosis patients with different Child-Pugh classes[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2022, 38( 2): 347- 351. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.02.018.

    高艳颖, 张旭, 李凤慧, 等. 不同Child-Pugh分级肝硬化患者糖化白蛋白的测定及其应用价值[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38( 2): 347- 351. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.02.018.
    [20]
    ZHAO D, YE JD, LI HL, et al. Application of liver three-dimensional visualized reconstruction technique in hepatectomy for children with compli-cated hepatoblastoma[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2021, 37( 9): 2130- 2135. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.09.025.

    赵頔, 叶进冬, 李华丽, 等. 肝脏三维可视化重建技术在儿童复杂肝母细胞瘤肝切除术中的应用价值[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2021, 37( 9): 2130- 2135. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.09.025.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (49) PDF downloads(12) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return