Objective To investigate the application of a modified diagnostic scale in the diagnosis of acute drug-induced liver injury (DILI) .Methods A total of 82 patients with acute DILI who were treated in Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2011 to December 2015 were enrolled, among whom 52 were enrolled in DILI group and 30 were enrolled in non-DILI group.On the basis of Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) scale and with reference to Digestive Disease Week Japan scale, three parameters, i.e., “report of liver injury induced by single Chinese materia medica or Chinese patent medicine”, “eosinophil count”, and “drug lymphocyte stimulation test based on Cell Counting Kit-8”, were added to establish a modified diagnostic scale.The RUCAM scale and the modified diagnostic scale were used to evaluate each suspected drug to verify the sensitivity and specificity of this new scale in the diagnosis of DILI.The chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups.Results There were 75 suspected drugs in the DILI group and 41 suspected drugs in the non-DILI group.Compared with the RUCAM scale, the modified diagnostic scale increased the number of drugs evaluated as “highly probable” and “probable” from 74.7% to 94.7% (χ2=11.554, P=0.001) in the DILI group.In the non-DILI group, only 2 drugs (4.9%) were changed from“possible”to“probable”, and the other drugs were maintained as “possible”, “unlikely”, or“excluded”;the specificity of diagnosis was reduced from 100% to 95.1% (χ2=0.512, P=0.474) .Conclusion Compared with the RUCAM scale, this modified diagnostic scale has an increased sensitivity and a reduced specificity of diagnosis and needs to be further validated in clinical practice.
[1]FAN ZP, LIANG S, NIE W, et al.The application of a novel drug lymphocyte stimulation test using Cell Counting Kit-8 assay in diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2016, 32 (8) :1562-1565. (in Chinese) 范作鹏, 梁珊, 聂巍, 等.基于细胞计数试剂盒8的药物淋巴细胞刺激试验在急性药物性肝损伤诊断中的应用[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2016, 32 (8) :1562-1565.
|
[2]DANAN G, BENICHOU C.Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs---I.A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings:application to drug-induced liver injuries[J].J Clin Epidemiol, 1993, 46 (11) :1323-1330.
|
[3]WATANABE M, SHIBUYA A.Validity study of a new diagnostic scale for drug-induced liver injury in Japan-comparison with two previous scales[J].Hepatol Res, 2004, 30 (3) :148-154.
|
[4]CHALASANI NP, HAYASHI PH, BONKOVSKY HL, et al.ACGClinical Guideline:the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury[J].Am J Gastroenterol, 2014, 109 (7) :950-966.
|
[5]Drug-induced Liver Disease Study Group, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association.Guidelines for the management of drug-induced liver injury[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2015, 31 (11) :1752-1769. (in Chinese) 中华医学会肝病学分会药物性肝病学组.药物性肝损伤诊治指南[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2015, 31 (11) :1752-1769.
|
[6] HAO KY, YU YC, HE CL.RUCAM sacle-based diagnosis, clinical features and prognosis of 140 cases of drug-induced liver injury[J].Chin J Hepatol, 2014, 22 (12) :938-941. (in Chinese) 郝坤艳, 于乐成, 何长伦.基于Roussel uclaf因果关系评估量表的药物性肝损伤140例诊治分析[J].中华肝脏病杂志, 2014, 22 (12) :938-941.
|
[7] NARANJO CA, BUSTO U, SELLERS EM, et al.A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions[J].Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1981, 30 (2) :239-245.
|
[8]MARIA VA, VICTORINO RM.Development and validation of a clinical scale for the diagnosis of drug-induced hepatitis[J].Hepatology, 1997, 26 (3) :664-669.
|
[9]TAJIRI K, SHIMIZU Y.Practical guidelines for diagnosis and early management of drug-induced liver injury[J].World J Gastroenterol, 2008, 14 (44) :6774-6785.
|
[10]JIANG WH, SHI XH, LIANG WF, et al.Clinical analysis of 124patients with drug-induced hepatitis[J].Chin J Med, 2012, 47 (6) :58-59. (in Chinese) 江文华, 石晓红, 梁伟峰, 等.药物性肝炎124例临床分析[J].中国医刊, 2012, 47 (6) :58-59.
|