中文｜English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 35 Issue 3
Mar.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Clinical Hepatology  > 2019  >  35(3): 530-534

Value of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system versus Hong Kong Liver Cancer staging system in predicting the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.03.016

  • The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University

Research funding:

 

  • Received Date: 2018-10-17
  • Published Date: 2019-03-20
    Abstract
  • Objective To investigate the value of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer ( BCLC) staging system versus Hong Kong Liver Cancer ( HKLC) staging system in predicting the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma ( HCC) . Methods A retrospective analysiswas performed for the clinical data of 436 previously untreated patients with HCC who were admitted to The Affiliated Tumor Hospital ofGuangxi Medical University from July 2008 to July 2013, and the staging score was determined according to the HKLC and BCLC staging sys-tems. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare the cumulative survival ratebetween the patients with different HKLC or BCLC stages. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the likelihood ratios ( LR χ2) of the two systems. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ( AUC) and C-index were used to analyze the dis-criminability and trend of the HKLC and BCLC staging systems. Results There was a significant difference in survival rate between the pa-tients with adjacent HKLC stages ( all P < 0. 05) , and there was also a significant difference in survival rate between all patients with adja-cent BCLC stages ( all P < 0. 001) , except between those with stage 0 and stage A HCC. The Cox proportional hazards model showed that theHKLC system ( LR χ2= 131. 14) had a better homogeneity than the BCLC system ( LR χ2= 100. 69) . The C-index of the BCLC and HKLCsystems was 0. 703 ( 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0. 675-0. 731) and 0. 720 ( 95% CI: 0. 692-0. 748) , respectively, and there was asignificant difference in C-index between the two systems ( P < 0. 001) . There was a significant difference in the AUC of 1-year cumula-tive survival rate between the BCLC system and the HKLC system [0. 783 ( 95% CI: 0. 745-0. 821) vs 0. 811 ( 95% CI: 0. 774-0. 849) , P = 0. 026]. Conclusion Both BCLC and HKLC staging systems have a good value in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients, but the HKLC staging system has a higher value than the BCLC staging system.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(21)
  • [1] BRAY F, FERLAY J, SOERJOMATARAM I, et al. Global canc-er statistics 2018:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence andmortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CACancer J Clin, 2018, 68 (6) :394-424.
    [2] SOBIN LH, COMPTON CC. TNM seventh edition:What's new, what's changed:Communication from the International Union A-gainst Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer[J].Cancer, 2010, 116 (22) :5336-5339.
    [3] OKUDA K, OHTSUKI T, OBATA H, et al. Natural history ofhepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treat-ment. Study of 850 patients[J]. Cancer, 1985, 56 (4) :918-928.
    [4] LLOVET JM, BRU C, BRUIX J. Prognosis of hepatocellularcarcinoma:The BCLC staging classification[J]. Semin LiverDis, 1999, 19 (3) :329-338.
    [5] KUDO M, CHUNG H, HAJI S, et al. Validation of a new prog-nostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma:The JISscore compared with the CLIP score[J]. Hepatology, 2004, 40 (6) :1396-1405.
    [6] LLOVET JM, BRUIX J. Prospective validation of the Cancer ofthe Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score:A new prognostic sys-tem for patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Hepatology, 2000, 32 (3) :679-680.
    [7] Committee of Liver Cancer of Chinese Anti-Cancer A. Clini-cal diagnosis and staging criteria for primary liver cancer[J].J Hepatol, 2001, 9 (6) :324.中国抗癌协会肝癌专业委员会.原发性肝癌的临床诊断与分期标准[J].中华肝脏病杂志, 2001, 9 (6) :324.
    [8] YAU T, TANG VY, YAO TJ, et al. Development of Hong KongLiver Cancer staging system with treatment stratification for pa-tients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2014, 146 (7) :1691-1700. e1693.
    [9] GUGLIELMI A, RUZZENENTE A, PACHERA S, et al. Compar-ison of seven staging systems in cirrhotic patients with hepato-cellular carcinoma in a cohort of patients who underwent radio-frequency ablation with complete response[J]. Am J Gastro-enterol, 2008, 103 (3) :597-604.
    [10] Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Diagno-sis, management, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (V2011) [J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2011, 27 (11) :1141-1159.中华人民共和国卫生部.原发性肝癌诊疗规范 (2011年版) [J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2011, 27 (11) :1141-1159.
    [11] BRUIX J, REIG M, SHERMAN M. Evidence-based diagno-sis, staging, and treatment of patients with hepatocellular car-cinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2016, 150:835-853.
    [12] CHU KK, CHEUNG TT. Update in management of hepatocel-lular carcinoma in Eastern population[J]. World J Hepatol, 2015, 7 (11) :1562-1571.
    [13] TORZILLI G, DONADON M, MARCONI M, et al. Hepatecto-my for stage B and stage C hepatocellular carcinoma in theBarcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification:Results of a pro-spective analysis[J]. Arch Surg, 2008, 143 (11) :1082-1090.
    [14] CHEN XP, HUANG ZY. Surgical treatment of hepatocellularcarcinoma in China:Surgical techniques, indications, andoutcomes[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2005, 390 (3) :259-265.
    [15] VITALE A, SARACINO E, BOCCAGNI P, et al. Validation ofthe BCLC prognostic system in surgical hepatocellular cancerpatients[J]. Transplant Proc, 2009, 41 (4) :1260-1263.
    [16] YAN X, FU X, CAI C, et al. Validation of models in patientswithhepatocellular carcinoma:Comparison of Hong Kong LiverCancer with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system in aChinese cohort[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015, 27 (10) :1180-1186.
    [17] YAU T, TANG VY, YAO TJ, et al. Development of Hong KongLiver Cancer Staging System with treatment stratification forpatients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2014, 146 (7) :1691-1700.
    [18] LIU PH, HSU CY, LEE YH, et al. Hong Kong Liver CancerStaging System is associated with better performance for hep-atocellular carcinoma:Special emphasis on viral etiology[J].Medicine (Baltimore) , 2015, 94 (41) :e1772.
    [19] LEE YS, SEO YS, KIM JH, et al. Can more aggressive treat-ment improve prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcino-ma? A direct comparison of the Hong Kong liver cancer andBarcelona clinic liver cancer algorithms[J]. Gut liver, 2018, 12 (1) :94-101.
    [20] ADHOUTE X, PENARANDA G, BRONOWICKI JP, et al. Use-fulness of the HKLC vs. the BCLC staging system in a Europe-an HCC cohort[J]. J Hepatol, 2015, 62 (2) :492-493.
    [21] KOLLY P, REEVES H, SANGRO B, et al. Assessment of theHong Kong Liver Cancer staging system in Europe[J]. LiverInt, 2016, 36 (6) :911-917.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1940) PDF downloads(336) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
        

    The first journal specializing in hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases in China

    Supervisor：Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China

    Sponsor：Jilin University

    Academic Support: Chinese Society of Hepatology，Chinese Medical Association

    Address: 461 Xinjiang Road, Changchun

    Submit：0431-88782044

    Peer review：0431-88783542

    Email：lcgdb@vip.163.com

    About Journal

    Submission Guideline

    Journal Online

    Hepatobiliary College

    Guidelines

    YesterdayIP[]YesterdayPV[]TodayIP[]TodayPV[]Online[]

    Website Design © 2020 Editorial Board of Journal of Clinical Hepatology 吉ICP备10000617号-1 Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return