中文｜English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 37 Issue 9
Sep.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Clinical Hepatology  > 2021  >  37(9): 2113-2119

Establishment and predictive value of an early warning system for recurrence after radical resection of BCLC stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.09.022
  • 1.

    Second Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China

  • 2.

    Department of Critical Care Medicine, Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, Sichuan 618000, China

Research funding:

The 2019 Scientific Research Project of City-University Cooperation in Nanchong Bureau of Science & Technology of Sichuan Province (18SXHZ0332)

  • Received Date: 2021-01-05
  • Accepted Date: 2021-03-01
  • Published Date: 2021-09-20
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To establish an Early Warning System for Recurrence Scoring after Radical Resection of BCLC stage 0/A Primary Liver Cancer (PLC-EWSPRS), and to investigate its predictive value.  Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 232 patients with BCLC stage 0/A liver cancer who underwent radical resection in Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical College from January 2009 to January 2015, and according to the presence or absence of recurrence within 5 years after surgery based on telephone or outpatient follow-up data, the patients were divided into recurrence group with 103 patients and non-recurrence group with 129 patients. The t-test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between groups; the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. The indices with statistical significance were included in the binary logistic regression analysis to investigate the risk factors for recurrence of BCLC stage 0/A liver cancer after surgery. Two points were assigned for independent risk factors and one point was assigned for risk factors to establish the PLC-EWSPRS system. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of this system.  Results  Compared with the non-recurrence group, the recurrence group had significantly higher levels of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and a significantly lower level of albumin (Alb) before surgery (Z=3.864 and 4.587, t=-5.628, all P < 0.001), as well as a significantly higher proportion of patients with positive HBsAg, capsular invasion, microvascular invasion (MVI), tumor diameter ≥5 cm, liver cirrhosis (moderate-to-severe), non-R0 resection, or death within 5 years (χ2=35.539, 22.325, 13.398, 7.130, 4.312, 4.034, and 18.527, all P < 0.05). The regression analysis showed that preoperative Alb < 40 g/L (odds ratio [OR]=5.796, P < 0.001), preoperative ALT ≥40 U/L (OR=3.029, P=0.002), MVI (OR=3.981, P=0.003), positive HBsAg (OR=7.829, P< 0.001), capsular invasion (OR=5.357, P< 0.001), and non-R0 resection (OR=3.048, P=0.018) were independent risk factors for recurrence of BCLC stage 0/A liver cancer within 5 years after surgery. According to the assignment criteria of the PLC-EWSPRS system, the recurrence group had the lowest score of 2 points and the highest score of 14 points, while the non-recurrence had the lowest score of 0 point and the highest score of 11 points, and the recurrence group had a significantly higher score than the non-recurrence group (P < 0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the PLC-EWSPRS system had an AUC of 0.918 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.883-0.953, P < 0.001) in predicting recurrence within 5 years after surgery in patients with BCLC stage 0/A liver cancer undergoing radical resection, and subgroup analysis showed that the system had an AUC of 0.796 (95% CI: 0.695-0.896, P=0.002), 0.859 (95% CI: 0.791-0.927, P < 0.001), and 0.944 (95% CI: 0.839-1.000, P=0.044), respectively, in predicting recurrence within 5 years after surgery in patients with a low score of 0-5 points, a moderate score of 6-10 points, and a high score of 11-14 points.  Conclusion  The PLC-EWSPRS system has a good value in predicting the recurrence of BCLC stage 0/A liver cancer within 5 years after surgery and thus has important guiding significance for postoperative reexamination and treatment strategy for patients with BCLC stage 0/A liver cancer undergoing radical resection.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(22)
  • [1]
    BRAY F, FERLAY J, SOERJOMATARAM I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492.
    [2]
    European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis[J]. J Hepatol, 2018, 69(2): 406-460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024.
    [3]
    TSILIMIGRAS DI, BAGANTE F, SAHARA K, et al. Prognosis after resection of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0, A, and B hepatocellular carcinoma: A comprehensive assessment of the current BCLC classification[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019, 26(11): 3693-3700. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07580-9.
    [4]
    FORNER A, LLOVET JM, BRUIX J. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9822): 1245-1255. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61347-0.
    [5]
    YANG WS, ZENG XF, LIU ZN, et al. Diet and liver cancer risk: A narrative review of epidemiological evidence[J]. Br J Nutr, 2020, 124(3): 330-340. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114520001208.
    [6]
    XU W, LIU F, SHEN X, et al. Prognostic nomograms for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy, with a focus on recurrence timing and post-recurrence management[J]. J Hepatocell Carcinoma, 2020, 7: 233-256. DOI: 10.2147/JHC.S271498.
    [7]
    LIU YW, YONG CC, LIN CC, et al. Liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma within and beyond the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer guideline recommendations: Results from a high-volume liver surgery center in East Asia[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2020, 122(8): 1587-1594. DOI: 10.1002/jso.26183.
    [8]
    TSILIMIGRAS DI, BAGANTE F, MORIS D, et al. Recurrence patterns and outcomes after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma within and beyond the barcelona clinic liver cancer criteria[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2020, 27(7): 2321-2331. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08452-3.
    [9]
    KABIR T, SYN N, RAMKUMAR M, et al. Effect of surgical delay on survival outcomes in patients undergoing curative resection for primary hepatocellular carcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores and propensity score adjustment[J]. Surgery, 2020, 167(2): 417-424. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.09.022.
    [10]
    Medical Administration of the National Health Commission of the people's Republic of China. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer in China (2019 edition)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2020, 36(2): 277-292. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.02.007.

    中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会政医管局. 原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2019年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(2): 277-292. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.02.007.
    [11]
    YANG F, MA L, YANG Y, et al. Contribution of hepatitis B virus infection to the aggressiveness of primary liver cancer: A clinical epidemiological study in Eastern China[J]. Front Oncol, 2019, 9: 370. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00370.
    [12]
    WANG S, WU QW, LI XK, et al. Interpretation of guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer in China (2019 edition)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2020, 36(5): 996-999. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.05.009.

    王姗, 吴庆旺, 李小科, 等. 《原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2019年版)》解读[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(5): 996-999. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.05.009.
    [13]
    WU JC, HUANG YH, CHAU GY, et al. Risk factors for early and late recurrence in hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Hepatol, 2009, 51(5): 890-897. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.07.009.
    [14]
    WANG B, XIA CY, LAU WY, et al. Determination of clonal origin of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma for personalized therapy and outcomes evaluation: A new strategy for hepatic surgery[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 217(6): 1054-1062. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.402.
    [15]
    KIM JM, KWON CH, JOH JW, et al. Intrahepatic metastasis is more risky than multiple occurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative liver resection[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2015, 62(138): 399-404. DOI: 10.5754/hge131006.
    [16]
    LIN S, YE F, RONG W, et al. Nomogram to assist in surgical plan for hepatocellular carcinoma: A prediction model for microvascular invasion[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, 23(12): 2372-2382. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04140-0.
    [17]
    ZHANG X, LI J, SHEN F, et al. Significance of presence of microvascular invasion in specimens obtained after surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 33(2): 347-354. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13843.
    [18]
    ROAYAIE S, BLUME IN, THUNG SN, et al. A system of classifying microvascular invasion to predict outcome after resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2009, 137(3): 850-855. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.003.
    [19]
    ERSTAD DJ, TANABE KK. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019, 26(5): 1474-1493. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07227-9.
    [20]
    REGIMBEAU JM, ABDALLA EK, VAUTHEY JN, et al. Risk factors for early death due to recurrence after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: Results of a multicenter study[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2004, 85(1): 36-41. DOI: 10.1002/jso.10284.
    [21]
    LAFARO K, GRANDHI MS, HERMAN JM, et al. The importance of surgical margins in primary malignancies of the liver[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2016, 113(3): 296-303. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24123.
    [22]
    HU W, HUANG S, DONG L, et al. MDR1 gene polymorphism correlated with pathological characteristics and prognosis in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma receiving interventional therapy[J]. Anticancer Drugs, 2019, 30(3): 233-240. DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000680.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(4)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (481) PDF downloads(44) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
        

    The first journal specializing in hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases in China

    Supervisor：Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China

    Sponsor：Jilin University

    Academic Support: Chinese Society of Hepatology，Chinese Medical Association

    Address: 461 Xinjiang Road, Changchun

    Submit：0431-88782044

    Peer review：0431-88783542

    Email：lcgdb@vip.163.com

    About Journal

    Submission Guideline

    Journal Online

    Hepatobiliary College

    Guidelines

    YesterdayIP[]YesterdayPV[]TodayIP[]TodayPV[]Online[]

    Website Design © 2020 Editorial Board of Journal of Clinical Hepatology 吉ICP备10000617号-1 Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return