中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Issue 4
Apr.  2016

Ultrasonographic signs as factors for recurrence of gallstones and polypoid lesions of the gallbladder after gallbladder-preserving surgery

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.04.029
  • Published Date: 2016-04-20
  • Objective To investigate ultrasonographic signs as the factors for the recurrence of gallstones and polypoid lesion of the gallbla-dder in patients undergoing gallbladder- preserving surgery. Methods Related signs including gallbladder size,sound transmission of the gallbladder,gallbladder wall thickness,cholestasis,gallbladder contraction function,and common bile duct diameter measured by preoperative and postoperative ultrasonography,as well as the recurrence of gallstones and polypoid lesions of the gallbladder after surgery,were collected from 700 patients who underwent gallbladder- preserving surgery in Huangshi Central Hospital from January 2011 to February 2015.The Fisher's exact test and Cox proportional hazards regression model were applied for univariate and multivariate analysis of related factors for recurrence after gallbladder- preserving surgery. Results The shortest and longest follow- up time was 6 months and 48 months,respectively,and the mean follow- up time was 18 ± 12 months. Among the 700 patients,1 experienced recurrence of gallstones at 1 month after surgery,2 experienced recurrence of gallstones at 6 months after surgery,1 experienced recurrence of gallstones at 12 months after surgery,and 1 experienced recurrence of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder at 24 months after surgery. The mean time to recurrence of gallstones and polypoid lesions was 9. 8 months after surgery,and the recurrence rate was 0. 71%( 5 /700). The univariate analysis showed that gallbladder wall thickness ≥4 mm,gallbladder contraction function < 30%,and cholestasis were significantly associated with the recurrence of gallstones and polypoid lesions( all P < 0. 05). The multivariate analysis showed that gallbladder wall thickness ≥4 mm,cholestasis,and gallbladder contraction function < 30% were independent factors for recurrence after gallbladder- preserving surgery( P = 0. 000 3,0. 040 0,and 0. 040 0). Conclusion Ultrasonography shows that gallbladder wall thickness ≥4 mm,gallbladder contraction function < 30%,and cholestasis are closely associated with the recurrence of gallstones and polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.

     

  • [1]SONG ZW.Significance of cholestasis in gallbladder and gallbladder wall thickening in ultrasonic diagnosis[J].Int J Surg,1992,5:311.(in Chinese)宋志武.胆囊内胆汁淤积和胆囊壁增厚在超声诊断中的意义[J].国际外科学杂志,1992,5:311.
    [2]ZHANG H,PAN YZ,ZHANG H,et al.Contrastive study for treatment of cholecystolithiasis by minimally invasive cholecystolithotomy with gallbladder reservation combined tauroursodeoxycholic acid and laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J/CD].Chin J Clinicians:Electronic Edition,2014,8(5):873-878.(in Chinese)张宏,潘耀振,张浩,等.微创保胆取石联合牛黄熊去氧胆酸与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的对比研究[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2014,8(5):873-878.
    [3]GU H,CAO J,ZHAO JM,et al.Mata analysis on domestic minicholecystolithotomy with gallbladder preserved[J].China J Modern Med,2008,18(22):3355-3357.(in Chinese)谷昊,曹峻,赵晋明,等.国内保胆取石荟摹分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2008,18(22):3355-3357.
    [4]LU QP.Controversy and consensus of reserve or removal gallbladder for cholecystitis and gallstone[J].Chin J Pract Surg,2015,35(1):49-53.(in Chinese)卢绮萍.慢性胆囊炎胆囊结石行保留及切除胆囊的争议与共识[J].中国实用外科杂志,2015,35(1):49-53.
    [5]RONG WS.Clinical evaluation of mini-cholecystolithotomy for gallstones[J].China J Endosc,2002,8(12):21-23.(in Chinese)荣万水.微创胆囊切开取石术的临床评价[J].中国内镜杂志,2002,8(12):21-23.
    [6]ZHANG PQ,LI QM,LIU LY,et al.Preventative effect of lidanfangshi powder on relapse of lithiasis after microinvasive gallbladder protected lithotomy[J].Chin Gen Pract,2010,13(3):991.(in Chinese)张培琴,李卿明,刘伦扬,等.利胆防石散对微创保胆取石术后胆囊结石复发的预防作用[J].中国全科医学,2010,13(3):991.
    [7]HOU YK,LI ZH,WANG WZ,et al.The clinical analysis of combined laparoscopic and choledochoscopiclithotomy with gallbladder preservation during three years of follow-up after surgery:report of239 cases[J].China J Endosc,2014,20(12):1268-1271.(in Chinese)候元凯,李振华,王伟智,等.239例腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术后3年临床随访分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2014,20(12):1268-1271.
    [8]WANG Q,YANG P,WANG CG,et al.Stage and grade-based surgical strategy for gallstone disease:the experiences of 441 cases of gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy[J].China J Endosc,2014,20(3):225-229.(in Chinese)王青,杨平,王成果,等.胆囊结石分级分期治疗策略-附441例保胆手术经验总结与体会[J].中国内镜杂志,2014,20(3):225-229.
    [9]ZHANG DJ,LEI P,ZHAO GZ.Operation method and surgical indications for minimally invasive endoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy(polypectomy)[J].J Ningxia Med Univ,2015,37(2):230-232.(in Chinese)张多钧,雷鹏,赵国忠.内镜微创保胆取石(息肉)术式及手术指征[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2015,37(2):230-232.
    [10]CUI HJ,ZHAO WP,WANG XY,et al.Value of ultrasonic gallbladder function classification in minimally invasive gallbladderpreserving cholecystolithotomy[J].Guide China Med,2013,11(34):466-467.(in Chinese)崔惠娟,赵文鹏,王新燕,等.超声下胆囊功能分级在微创保胆取石术中的应用价值分析[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(34):466-467.
    [11]ZHANG HP.Experience in treatment of 326 patients with gallstones[J].J Clin Hepatol,2015,31(5):741-744.(in Chinese)张和平.326例胆囊结石患者规范化治疗的体会[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2015,31(5):741-744.
    [12]ZHANG PH,XIA X,LIAN SS,et al.Application of gallbladder function evaluation by ultrasound in minimally invasive gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy[J].China Foreign Med Treatment,2010,29(23):174-175.(in Chinese)张片红,夏香,廉世松,等.B超评价胆囊功能在微创保胆取石术的应用[J].中外医疗,2010,29(23):174-175.
    [13]HUANG HY,MA RH,QIAO T,et al.Effect of gallbladder-preserving cholelithotomy using rigid endoscope on gallbladder wall thickness in gallstone patients[J].China J Modern Med,2015,23(8):95-98.(in Chinese)黄海仪,马瑞红,乔铁,等.硬镜保胆取石对胆囊结石患者胆囊壁厚度的作用分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2015,23(8):95-98.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Ye LU, Shaoshan HAN, Qingguang LIU. High-risk factors for early postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and related prediction methods[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2024, 40(10): 2098-2103. doi: 10.12449/JCH241028
    [2]Jiqiang LI, Guixin ZHANG. Research advances in the risk factors for recurrence of common bile duct stone after choledocholithotomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2023, 39(1): 231-237. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.01.036
    [3]Yiping LIU, Xinping LI, Lei CHEN, Jinju XIA, Kairong SONG, Ningyang JIA, Wanmin LIU. Accurate imaging diagnosis and recurrence prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma based on artificial intelligence[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2022, 38(3): 521-527. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.03.006
    [4]Liu LIU, Qiuluo CHENG, Changchuan BAI, Ying ZHU. Advances of traditional Chinese medicine in prevention and treatment of recurrence and metastasis of liver cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2021, 37(5): 1216-1220. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.05.051
    [5]Zhaobo LIU, Guangming LI. Advances in the prevention and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2021, 37(2): 267-271. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.02.006
    [6]LI XianQiu, LIU Hui, XIAO ChunTao, LUO Gang, ZHOU Xian. Influence of metabolic syndrome on patients with recurrence of hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(11): 2515-2520. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.11.023
    [7]Wang ZhiXin, Li Yao, Wang JiangYu, Li WeiXia, Ren Li, Wang HaiJiu, Dong JiaHong, Fan HaiNing. Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis recurring after autologous liver transplantation: A case report[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(8): 1832-1834. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.08.033
    [8]WANG HongBo, LI LiCuan, YU YanBin, MENG LingZhan, BAI Ying, LI XiaoDong, SUN YanLing, LIU ZhenWen. Recurrence of erythropoietic protoporphyria after liver transplantation:A case report and literature review[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(11): 2545-2547. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.11.032
    [9]Li YanFei, Du QianCheng, Zhang MengZhao, Mei XuePeng, Chen YiChong, Zhou Ying, Fan HaiNing. Reconsideration of indications for gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy and preventive measures for postoperative recurrence of gallstones[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2019, 35(3): 690-695. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.03.054
    [10]Li Huan, Sun Jing, Zhang Tao, Fan YuZe, Sun YingZhe, He WeiPing, Duan XueZhang. Effect of Cyber Knife radiosurgery on survival rate of patients with recurrent liver cancer after surgery[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2017, 33(12): 2337-2341. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.12.016
    [11]Cao Yu, Ling Jun, Zhang Yong, Ding Bing, Jiang Hui. Recurrent acute pancreatitis:etiology and selection of treatment regimen[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2017, 33(12): 2346-2349. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.12.018
    [12]Li RenLi, Zhou Qing. Risk factors for recurrence after surgery for biliary pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2017, 33(5): 915-918. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.05.025
    [13]Qian Rui, Chen XiaoPeng. Risk factors for recurrence after surgery for common bile duct stones[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2017, 33(2): 394-399. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.02.042
    [14]Lu: Kun, Chen Xiang. Clinical features of recurrent biliary pancreatitis and its predisposing factors[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2016, 32(1): 127-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.01.024
    [15]Chen Zhi, Zhang HongYi, Xu XinBao, Liu ChengLi, Li XinHui. Recurrence after gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy for sand-like and non-sand-like gallstones: a comparative analysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2016, 32(7): 1351-1353. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.07.029
    [16]Cheng Lin, Mei Yong. The diagnostic value of low-frequency ultrasound combined with high-frequency ultrasound in hyperplastic of the gallbladder[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2016, 32(7): 1345-1347. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.07.027
    [17]Wang YiBin, Liao JinTang, Xie LuLu, Qi WenJun, Chen LuYang, Li YueYi. Predictive value of preoperative ultrasound examination for factors associated with early postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection [J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2015, 31(12): 2061-2065. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2015.12.018
    [18]Liu LingFeng, Lu HaiYing, Yu YanYan, Wu ChiHong, Tian XiuLan. A comparative study of FibroScan and B ultrasound in diagnosis of liver fibrosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2014, 30(10): 1045-1049. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2014.10.018
    [19]Wang Yan, Li BingShun, Wang JianBin. Study about ultrasonic and fibrosis parameters with diagnose of hepatic fibrosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2008, 24(1): 31-33.
    [20]Zhang XiaoHong, Zheng RongQin, Lu CuiRong, Chen Qing, Yang ShaoJi. Ultrasonography prediction of the portal hypertensive gastropathy in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2004, 20(1): 30-31.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 薛从艳. 超声在胆囊结石与胆囊息肉鉴别诊断中的应用价值. 中国医疗器械信息. 2022(20): 89-91 .
    2. 李想,谢艳,王钧. 空勤人员胆石症特点及其防治综述. 解放军医学院学报. 2021(07): 771-775 .
    3. 胡菁. 胆囊结石超声检查及影像学特征研究. 心理月刊. 2019(08): 147 .
    4. 段东峰,杨振宇,杜锡林,王青,鲁建国. 放射性核素肝胆显像对腹腔镜联合硬镜微创保胆取石术前胆囊收缩功能的评估作用. 临床肝胆病杂志. 2019(08): 1751-1754 . 本站查看
    5. 郑硕,黄奕红. 硬质胆道镜微创保胆术治疗胆囊颈管嵌顿结石复发的影响因素分析. 临床合理用药杂志. 2019(24): 123-125 .
    6. 刘冰,尚培中. 成人胆囊运动障碍的诊治进展. 临床肝胆病杂志. 2018(04): 896-899 . 本站查看
    7. 陈晶,周文秀,宋波,张永康. 利胆健脾法对微创保胆取石术后并发症及血清生化指标的影响. 现代中西医结合杂志. 2018(25): 2810-2813 .
    8. 周萍. 胆囊疾病超声体检效果及其漏诊误诊原因研究. 现代医药卫生. 2018(17): 2724-2725 .
    9. 叶向东. 中山市社区居民胆囊息肉的危险因素调查. 中国医学创新. 2018(12): 126-129 .
    10. 张保柱. 胆囊息肉相关危险因素的研究进展. 青海医药杂志. 2017(02): 78-80 .
    11. 黄毅敏,王小锋,向炳辉,王刚,邓永康,王杰良. 结石嵌顿性胆囊炎患者硬镜微创保胆手术后胆囊收缩功能变化及其影响因素. 山东医药. 2017(12): 68-71 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.3 %FULLTEXT: 8.3 %META: 88.7 %META: 88.7 %PDF: 3.0 %PDF: 3.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.6 %其他: 7.6 %其他: 0.5 %其他: 0.5 %China: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %India: 0.2 %India: 0.2 %[]: 1.0 %[]: 1.0 %上海: 5.4 %上海: 5.4 %中卫: 1.0 %中卫: 1.0 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %北京: 13.3 %北京: 13.3 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南阳: 0.2 %南阳: 0.2 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %吉林: 0.5 %吉林: 0.5 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %和田: 0.2 %和田: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %四平: 0.2 %四平: 0.2 %大庆: 0.2 %大庆: 0.2 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %开普敦: 0.2 %开普敦: 0.2 %张家口: 2.7 %张家口: 2.7 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %拉斯维加斯: 0.2 %拉斯维加斯: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %杭州: 1.7 %杭州: 1.7 %枣庄: 0.2 %枣庄: 0.2 %柳州: 0.2 %柳州: 0.2 %株洲: 0.2 %株洲: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %泰州: 0.2 %泰州: 0.2 %海口: 0.2 %海口: 0.2 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %湖州: 1.0 %湖州: 1.0 %濮阳: 0.2 %濮阳: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 37.2 %芒廷维尤: 37.2 %莫斯科: 0.8 %莫斯科: 0.8 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 17.2 %西宁: 17.2 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %赫尔辛基: 0.2 %赫尔辛基: 0.2 %遂宁: 0.2 %遂宁: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %长春: 0.7 %长春: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %其他其他ChinaIndia[]上海中卫临汾北京南宁南阳台州吉林呼伦贝尔呼和浩特和田哈尔滨哥伦布四平大庆广州廊坊开普敦张家口成都扬州拉斯维加斯新乡无锡昆明杭州枣庄柳州株洲武汉泰州海口深圳湖州濮阳芒廷维尤莫斯科衢州西宁西安赫尔辛基遂宁银川长春长沙长治青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2394) PDF downloads(418) Cited by(11)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return