中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R

Clinical value of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in predicting esophageal variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.03.018
Research funding:

 

  • Received Date: 2019-10-23
  • Published Date: 2020-03-20
  • Objective To investigate the clinical value of acoustic radiation force impulse( ARFI) elastography in predicting esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 271 patients with liver cirrhosis who attended the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from October 2014 to May 2017,and ARFI elastography was performed for all patients to measure the elasticity of the liver and the spleen. According to the presence or absence of esophageal variceal bleeding,the patients were divided into bleeding group and non-bleeding group,and related indices were compared between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic( ROC) curve was used to evaluate the value of ARFI elasticity in the diagnosis of esophageal variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis. The t-test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between two groups,and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between two groups; the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. Results The bleeding group had a significantly higher ARFI elasticity of the spleen than the non-bleeding group [3. 89( 3. 49-4. 11) m/s vs 3. 46( 2. 93-3. 80) m/s,Z =-4. 941,P < 0. 001],and there was no significant difference in the ARFI elasticity of the liver between the bleeding group and the non-bleeding group [2. 08( 1. 57-2. 74)m/s vs 1. 98( 1. 49-2. 70) m/s,Z =-1. 025,P = 0. 305]. The areas under the ROC curve for ARFI elasticity values of the spleen and the liver were 0. 714 and 0. 544,respectively,in predicting esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis( P = 0. 002 5). At the cut-off value of 3. 71 m/s,the ARFI elasticity of the spleen had a sensitivity of 0. 68 and a specificity of 0. 69 in predicting esophageal variceal bleeding. Conclusion The ARFI elasticity value of the spleen has a better value than that of the liver in predicting the risk of esophageal variceal bleeding and thus holds promise for clinical application.

     

  • [1] Infectious Diseases and Parasitology Branch,Hepatology Branch,Chinese Medical Association. Guideline:Prevention and treatment of viral hepatitis[J]. Chin J Intern Med,2001,40(1):62-68.(in Chinese)中华医学会传染病与寄生虫病学分会、肝病学分会.病毒性肝炎防治方案[J].中华内科杂志,2001,40(1):62-68.
    [2] JANSEN C,MÖLLER P,MEYER C,et al. Increase in liver stiffness after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is associated with inflammation and predicts mortality[J]. Hepatology,2018,67(4):1472-1484.
    [3] GARCIA-TSAO G. Current management of the complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension:Variceal hemorrhage,ascites,and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis[J]. Gastroenterology,2001,120(3):726-748.
    [4] JENSEN DM. Endoscopic screening for varices in cirrhosis:Findings,implications,and outcomes[J]. Gastroenterology,2002,122(6):1620-1630.
    [5] RIZZO L,ATTANASIO M,PINZONE MR,et al. A new sampling method for spleen stiffness measurement based on quantitative acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for noninvasive assessment of esophageal varices in newly diagnosed HCV-related cirrhosis[J]. Biomed Res Int,2014,2014:365982.
    [6] ZHANG H,XU YQ. Association between serum ascites albumin gradient and esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis:A Meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2016,32(2):269-274.(in Chinese)张辉,徐有青.血清-腹水白蛋白梯度与肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血关系的Meta分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2016,32(2):269-274.
    [7] YANG WW,YANG JH. Efficiency of platelet count in predicting occurrence risk of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Med Prac,2018,22(19):101-105.(in Chinese)杨炜炜,杨建华.血小板计数预测肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张发生风险的探讨[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(19):101-105.
    [8] DENG H,QI XS,PENG Y,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of APRI,AAR,FIB-4,FI,and king scores for diagnosis of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis:A retrospective study[J]. Med Sci Monit,2015,21:3961-3977.
    [9] PEAGU R,SARARU R,NECULA A,et al. The role of spleen stiffness using ARFI in predicting esophageal varices in patients with hepatitis B and C virus-related cirrhosis[J]. Rom J Intern Med,2019.[Epub ahead of print]
    [10] ZHANF DK,CHEN M,GAO YJ,et al. Clinical value of spleen acoustic radiation force impulse,aspartate aminotransferaseto-platelet ratio index,and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio in predicting esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2018,34(3):508-512.(in Chinese)张大鹍,陈敏,皋月娟,等.脾脏ARFI弹性值与APRI及AAR指数对肝硬化食管静脉曲张的预测价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2018,34(3):508-512.
    [11] ZHENG LP,WEN W,JIAN Y. The predictive value of transient elastography on upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. J Chengdu Med Coll,2018,13(1):85-88.(in Chinese)郑丽萍,文武,蹇贻.瞬时弹性成像技术对肝硬化患者上消化道出血的预测价值[J].成都医学院学报,2018,13(1):85-88.
    [12] GHANY MG,DOO E. Assessment of liver fibrosis:Palpate,poke or pulse[J]. Hepatology,2005,42(4):759-761.
    [13] ZHANG Y,DONG L,WANG H,et al. Correlation between liver stiffness and esophageal and gastric varices determined by acoustic radiation force impulse[J]. Chin J Ultrasound Med,2019,35(8):706-708.(in Chinese)张彦,董磊,王惠,等.声脉冲辐射力成像测定肝实质硬度与食管胃底静脉曲张相关性的初步研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2019,35(8):706-708.
    [14] DIETRICH CF,BAMBER J,BERZIGOTTI A,et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of liver ultrasound elastography,update 2017(long version)[J]. Ultraschall Med,2017,38(4):e16-e47.
    [15] BOTA S,SPOREA I,SIRLI R,et al. Spleen assessment by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography(ARFI)for prediction of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension[J]. Med Ultrason,2010,12(3):213-217.
    [16] KIM HY,JIN EH,KIM W,et al. The role of spleen stiffness in determining the severity and bleeding risk of esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients[J]. Medicine,2015,94(24):e1031.
    [17] YANG XS,MENG FK,LYU Y. Feasibility of predicting esophageal varice and bleeding by spleen stiffness[J]. Beijing Med J,2017,39(12):1252-1254.(in Chinese)杨雪松,孟繁坤,吕元.肝硬度预测食管静脉曲张程度及出血风险的可行性研究[J].北京医学,2017,39(12):1252-1254.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Lei WANG, Kangwei LIU, Yuling DUAN, Xinyao LI, Cijun PENG. Current status of the application of robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2021, 37(11): 2732-2736. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.11.054
    [2]Zhilong SHI, Hao XU, Changpeng CHAI, Sijie YANG, Wence ZHOU. Clinical application value of difficulty score systems before laparoscopic liver resection[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2021, 37(8): 1888-1893. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.08.027
    [3]ZHANG ZhongLin, YUAN YuFeng. Key operating points of laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver tumor in difficult locations[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(12): 2663-2666. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.12.006
    [4]Gao BenJian, Luo Jia, Liu Ying, Yang XiaoLi, Su Song, Li Bo. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic versus open liver resection in treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: A Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(3): 573-579. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.03.021
    [5]Zhang Bin, Luo De, Peng FangYi, Fang Cheng, Gan Yu, He Kai, Li Bo, Xia XianMing, Su Song. Clinical effect of robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy in treatment of liver diseases:A Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(8): 1778-1782. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.08.020
    [6]Li Le, Chen JinMing, Liu ZhongHua, Li Qiang, Shi Ying. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery versus traditional rehabilitation program in hepatectomy: a Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2018, 34(2): 303-308. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.02.017
    [7]Wang XinTuan, Li ShanLin, Geng ZhiMin. A propensity score matching study of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy in treatment of regional hepatolithiasis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2018, 34(3): 531-534. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.03.016
    [8]Han Bing, Ding YiTao, Zhu XinHua, Wu YaFu, Tang Ning, Gao JiaLin, Dai Jun, Xu QingXiang, Cui Heng, He NingNing, Shi XiaoLei. Clinical effect and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic hepatectomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2018, 34(3): 567-572. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.03.024
    [9]Tian Zhou, Zhang JianHuai, Sun XiTai, Liu Bin, Qi FuZhen, Wang YeBo, Wu JinSheng, Gu DianHua. Experience in laparoscopic hepatectomy in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2018, 34(8): 1712-1716. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.08.024
    [10]Chen Kai, Li XiangNong, Liu Kun, Nan YunGuang, Yang Jun. Clinical effect of hepatectomy versus extracapsular peeling in treatment of hepatic hemangioma[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2017, 33(4): 699-704. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.04.020
    [11]Liu Bin, Li WenGang, Chen FuZhen. Laparoscopic hepatectomy: the choice in the era of minimally invasive surgery[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2017, 33(4): 643-646. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.04.008
    [12]Wang JinWei, Zhang YaMin. Research advances in methods for determination of tumor boundary in hepatectomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2016, 32(2): 374-377. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.02.039
    [13]Ma YiYun, Jiang Hua, Zhang HongHeng. Clinical effect of laparoscopic versus open liver resection in treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma complicated by liver cirrhosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2016, 32(10): 1916-1919. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.10.018
    [14]Xiong Yong, Wang HeBin, Liu DeQin, Chen JianXun, Liu JianPing, Sun ChangQin. Total laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in the left lateral lobe: a case- matched analysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2016, 32(4): 735-738. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.04.026
    [15]Zhang ShengJun, Liu MinLi, Chang Qi, Liu YongFeng. Efficacy comparison of precise and traditional liver resection in treatment of intrahepatic bile duct stones[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2015, 31(10): 1648-1651. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2015.10.022
    [16]Shen YiNan, Huang ShengYu, Hu XianRong, Wang Jie, Yu HongMing, Lu Wen, Lu JunHua, Yang GuangShun, Wu MengChao. Clinical effect of laparoscopic hepatectomy in treating liver metastasis of colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2014, 30(12): 1287-1291. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2014.12.013
    [17]Zhang MingChang, Wang YaZhen, Liu YaHui. Clinical outcomes of partial hepatectomy and management experience in pediatric hepatic cancer patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2012, 28(12): 915-916+925.
    [18]Jiang Chao, Wang GuangYi, Wang Meng, Zhang Yi. One case report of laparoscopic resection of caudate lobe hepatocellular adenoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2012, 28(2): 144-145.
    [19]Ou Xi, Xiong Pei, Ye JianYu, Liu JiKui. Application of medical obturation glue in the treatment of hepatolithiasis with laparoscopic hepatectomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2011, 27(9): 927-930.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 芦建慧,李勇利,郭瑞芳,薛荣泉. 胆囊切除术后原发性胆总管结石复发患者的临床特征分析. 临床肝胆病杂志. 2025(01): 118-126 . 本站查看
    2. 陈大勇,郭宏志,李权. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合同期内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗高龄胆囊结石合并继发性胆总管结石患者的效果. 河南医学研究. 2024(06): 1060-1063 .
    3. 仝甲钊,曹振振,孙正路,周从顺,魏书堂. 胆总管结石合并十二指肠乳头旁憩室老年患者ERCP取石成功的影响因素. 河南医学研究. 2024(08): 1358-1362 .
    4. 李梦珂,李渊,王建伟. 胆囊结石合并胆总管多发结石治疗效果及其logistic回归分析. 黑龙江医学. 2024(17): 2054-2057 .
    5. 范嗣琪,魏然,魏杰,李富贵. 乳头夹闭成型+胆总管取石术治疗胆总管结石伴急性胆管炎的应用体会. 腹腔镜外科杂志. 2024(10): 741-746 .
    6. 李泳,周鸿鲲. 不同手术方法治疗胆囊切除后胆总管结石患者的临床疗效分析. 浙江创伤外科. 2023(06): 1118-1120 .
    7. 雷文俤,常贵建,卓信斌,林德新. 胆道冲洗装置在腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术中的应用体会. 腹腔镜外科杂志. 2023(08): 604-608 .
    8. 刘小红,刘洋,武起美. 肾结石行微创手术患者术后复发的影响因素及其防护对策分析. 内蒙古医学杂志. 2023(07): 875-877 .
    9. 吴灵燕,王晓荣,陈柳勇,徐陈柯,黄作斌. 超声联合CT检查在胆总管结石诊断中的应用价值及其漏诊的相关因素分析. 浙江创伤外科. 2023(07): 1372-1374 .
    10. 林秀苹,林洁君,郑艳莉. 彩色多普勒超声术前诊断胆囊结石效能及术后评估结石复发的危险因素分析. 浙江创伤外科. 2023(10): 1954-1957 .
    11. 云逸飞,王林恒,江贵,卢心毓,黄朔,何寅家,张丽杰. 单人经口胆道镜系统直视下与传统X线下非困难性胆总管结石取石的对比研究. 中华消化内镜杂志. 2023(09): 707-712 .
    12. 王亮,陈信浩. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石对患者肝功能及炎性应激反应的影响. 药物生物技术. 2023(06): 614-617 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 5.8 %FULLTEXT: 5.8 %META: 91.0 %META: 91.0 %PDF: 3.3 %PDF: 3.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.8 %其他: 6.8 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %India: 0.3 %India: 0.3 %上海: 3.0 %上海: 3.0 %丽水: 0.8 %丽水: 0.8 %北京: 11.0 %北京: 11.0 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %吉林: 1.0 %吉林: 1.0 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %张家口: 3.0 %张家口: 3.0 %徐州: 0.5 %徐州: 0.5 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %杭州: 0.3 %杭州: 0.3 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %漳州: 0.3 %漳州: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 29.8 %芒廷维尤: 29.8 %莫斯科: 2.5 %莫斯科: 2.5 %西宁: 37.3 %西宁: 37.3 %辽阳: 0.3 %辽阳: 0.3 %长春: 1.3 %长春: 1.3 %其他其他ChinaIndia上海丽水北京南宁台州吉林哥伦布张家口徐州昆明杭州武汉漳州芒廷维尤莫斯科西宁辽阳长春

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1138) PDF downloads(196) Cited by(15)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return