中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Issue 8
Aug.  2014

Clinical efficacy of transumbilical single- port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic knife for directly handling cystic artery

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2014.08.018
  • Received Date: 2013-11-28
  • Published Date: 2014-08-20
  • Objective To investigate the clinical feasibility and value of transumbilical single- port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative ultrasonic knife for directly handling the cystic artery.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 231 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative ultrasonic knife for directly handling the cystic artery in our department from March 2011 to December 2012.According to the required surgical approaches, the patients were divided into transumbilical single- port laparoscopic group (n = 125, group A) and three- port laparoscopic group (n = 106, group B) .The two groups were compared in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative analgesia, postoperative food intake, length of postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications, as well as the performance of the ultrasonic knife in directly handling the cystic artery.Comparison of continuous data between groups was made by t test, while comparison of categorical data was made by chi- square test.Results Group A had a significantly longer mean operative time than group B (20.21 ± 1.86 min vs 18.43 ± 1.37 min, P < 0.05) .There was no significant difference in mean intraoperative blood loss between groups A and B (23.23 ± 6.25 ml vs 22.34 ± 5.49 ml, P > 0.05) .Group A had significantly fewer patients who needed postoperative analgesia than group B (5 vs 21, P < 0.05) .The time to postoperative food intake showed no significant difference between groups A and B (6.56 ± 1.23 h vs 6.67 ± 1.45 h, P > 0.05) .The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was (2.98 ± 0.23) d in group A, versus (3.02 ± 0.18) d in group B (P > 0.05) .No indwelling drainage tube was used after operation in either group.There were no postoperative bleeding, bile duct injury, bile leakage, incisional wound infection, and other complications in the two groups.The ultrasonic knife had reliable hemostatic effect when directly sealing the cystic artery, without causing postoperative secondary bleeding.All patients were followed up for 2- 12 months (mean, 6.5 months) ;they recovered well without incisional hernia, and the umbilical scar was not obvious, with relatively good cosmetic results.Conclusion Transumbilical single- port laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a comparable clinical effect to three- port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, causing little trauma, postoperative pain, and scar, and it is suitable for patients with a high demand for incision appearance.Directly sealing the cystic artery with the ultrasonic knife can reduce bleeding due to careful separation of the cystic artery and shorten the operative time.Therefore, it is a safe, feasible surgical approach and worthy of clinical application.

     

  • [1]SUN K, LI J, TIAN H, et al.The transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a report of 20 cases[J].J Laparo Surg, 2011, 16 (10) :774-775. (in Chinese) 孙凯, 李杰, 田虎, 等.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术20例报告[J].腹腔镜外科杂志, 2011, 16 (10) :774-775.
    [2]FAN QQ, YUAN C, CHEN SW, et al.Application of ultrasonic scalpel in handling cystic artery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a report of 2257 cases[J].J Abdominal Surg, 2010, 23 (6) :375. (in Chinese) 范钦桥, 袁超, 陈书伟, 等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中超声刀处理胆囊动脉2257例报告[J].腹部外科, 2010, 23 (6) :375.
    [3]PODOLSKY ER, CRUCILLO II PG, ROTTMAN SJ, et al.Singleport access (SPA) surgry-initial experience of a novel minimal access approach applied across sursicai specialties[J].Surg Endosc, 2008, 22 (Suppl) :s172.
    [4]KOBAYASHI S, NAGANO H, MARUBASHI S, et al.A singleincision laparoscopic hepatecomy for hepatocellular carcinoma:initial experience in a Japanese patient[J].Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2010, 19 (6) :367-371.
    [5]JIANG ZL, PENG ZY, ZHOU B, et al.Experience in application of transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a report of 21 cases[J].J Surg Concepts Pract, 2011, 16 (5) :496-497. (in Chinese) 蒋志龙, 彭志洋, 周斌, 等.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的应用体会 (附21例报告) [J].外科理论与实践, 2011, 16 (5) :496-497.
    [6]WU ZM, CHU XF, LOU JP, et al.The expioration of trans-umbilicus single-port laparoscopic for clinical generalization[J].Chin J Laparoscopic Surgery:Electronic Edition, 2011, 4 (3) :217-220. (in Chinese) 吴志明, 储修峰, 娄建平, 等.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床推广探讨[J].中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版, 2011, 4 (3) :217-220.
    [7]ZHANG ZD, GUO WK.Comparative study between transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecys-tectomy[J].J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2012, 20 (5) :367-370. (in Chinese) 张正东, 国维克.经脐单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较研究[J].肝胆外科杂志, 2012, 20 (5) :367-370.
    [8]ZHANG GY, HU SY, LI F.The transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].J Laparo Surg, 2009, 14 (1) :18-20. (in Chinese) 张光永, 胡三元, 李峰.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术[J].腹腔镜外科杂志, 2009, 14 (1) :18-20.
    [9]ZHANG Y.To improve the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2013, 29 (6) :471-480. (in Chinese) 张勇.提高腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性探讨[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2013, 29 (6) :471-480.
    [10]YI ZH, WANG DQ, CHANG YB.Cholecystitis laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 53 cases[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2013, 29 (3) :194-195. (in Chinese) 伊正辉, 王达庆, 常迎彬.急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术53例临床分析[J].临床肝胆病杂, 2013, 29 (3) :194-195.
    [11]ZHANG C, ZHANG WJ, ZHU CL, et al.Analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in primary hospital of conversion to laparotomy[J].J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2013, 21 (4) :282-284. (in Chinese) 张超, 张文俊, 朱春林, 等.基层医院腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹原因分析[J].肝胆外科杂志, 2013, 21 (4) :282-284.
    [12]CHEN YK, DAWA JM, LUO YG, et al.The transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a report of 67 cases[J].J Laparo Surg, 2012, 17 (7) :500-502. (in Chinese) 陈友康, 达瓦晋美, 罗亦刚, 等.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术67例报告[J].腹腔镜外科杂志, 2012, 17 (7) :500-502.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Afang SU, Xiaozhong JIANG, Yunshui ZHANG, Shouling WU, Guangjian LI. Influence of serum cumulative triglyceride exposure on the risk of acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2024, 40(12): 2492-2498. doi: 10.12449/JCH241220
    [2]Minyue YIN, Jinzhou ZHU, Lu LIU, Jingwen GAO, Jiaxi LIN, Chunfang XU. Research advances in machine learning models for acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2023, 39(12): 2978-2984. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.12.034
    [3]Xuyang WANG, Zhangpeng WANG, Jun WU, Guangxu JING, Zhu HUANG, Hongyu SUN, Lijun TANG. Effect of early thoracic paracentesis drainage on acute lung injury in severe acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2023, 39(7): 1633-1642. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.07.018
    [4]Xiaogang XIANG, Dabao SHANG, Jinming ZHANG. The definition and pathogenesis of acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2023, 39(10): 2281-2287. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.10.003
    [5]Chan LI, Zhihai LIANG, Guodu TANG. Influencing factors for persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis and establishment of a predictive model[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2023, 39(6): 1382-1390. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.06.019
    [6]Heming HUANG, Huiying YANG, Yingying QIN, Guodu TANG. Relationship between visceral fat related index and the severity of acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2022, 38(10): 2313-2319. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.10.021
    [7]Wenqian XU, Min GUO, Xiao WANG, Yaoqi WU, Jinyuan ZHANG, Heguo LI. Molecular mechanism of liver injury in acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2022, 38(11): 2663-2668. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.11.045
    [8]LIU Hui, LI XianQiu, LUO Gang, TANG ShiXiao. Risk factors for new-onset diabetes after incipient acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(12): 2771-2776. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.12.026
    [9]ZHANG Ting, LI Ting, HUANG YuMei, WANG 烜. Value of body fat parameters in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(12): 2761-2764. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.12.024
    [10]Lyu NongHua, He WenHua. Endoscopic therapy for acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(8): 1688-1690. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.08.002
    [12]LI Yan, LU LunGen. Emphasis on the basic and clinical research on hepatorenal syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(11): 2401-2405. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.11.001
    [13]Ma Min, Zhou ZhongYin. A comparative analysis of acute pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(2): 395-398. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.02.033
    [14]CAO Fei, PAN ChangBao, XU QingCheng, CHEN WeiWei, DENG DengHao, XIANG XiaoXing, CHEN Juan. Treatment of recurrent acute pancreatitis caused by incomplete pancreatic divisum via stent implantation of the accessory pancreatic duct by a reversed guide wire through the main pancreatic duct: A case report[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(12): 2805-2807. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.12.033
    [15]Pancreas Study Group, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Chinese Medical Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Pancreatology, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Digestion. Chinese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis ( Shanghai, 2013)[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2013, 29(9): 656-660. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2013.09.006
    [16]Liu ChengYi, Chen YanDong. Measurement of serum leptin level in acute pancreatitis patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2009, 25(6): 437-439.
    [17]Zhang MingWei, Wang Xin, Zhang Jing. The correlation between TAP levels in plasma and urine and severity in patients with acute pancreatitis and their clinical significances[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2007, 23(6): 448-449.
    [20]Zhang Jing, Zhao Jun, Li SanJun, Dan Jing, Wang Fang, Duan ZhongPing. Clinical features of liver injury in SARS patients with system inflammatory reaction syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2003, 19(6): 339-341.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 徐萌,张磊. 基于科学知识图谱的职务犯罪文献计量应用. 数字技术与应用. 2022(02): 7-9 .
    2. 孙明珠. 院前急救气道管理的研究现状与前景可视化分析. 岭南急诊医学杂志. 2022(06): 550-553 .
    3. 李灵敏,李博,刘晓峰. 基于CiteSpace和VOSviewer的肠道菌群研究热点可视化分析. 现代消化及介入诊疗. 2021(08): 984-989 .
    4. 刘珊珊,王聪,杨智博,陈玉珍,雷常彬,蒋艳. 中心静脉导管相关性血流感染研究现状及热点的可视化分析. 护理研究. 2021(24): 4478-4483 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 4.5 %FULLTEXT: 4.5 %META: 92.6 %META: 92.6 %PDF: 2.9 %PDF: 2.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.9 %其他: 4.9 %India: 0.3 %India: 0.3 %United States: 0.6 %United States: 0.6 %上海: 1.0 %上海: 1.0 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %北京: 5.8 %北京: 5.8 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %吉林: 1.3 %吉林: 1.3 %张家口: 4.2 %张家口: 4.2 %杭州: 0.3 %杭州: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 33.7 %芒廷维尤: 33.7 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %莫斯科: 1.6 %莫斯科: 1.6 %西宁: 44.0 %西宁: 44.0 %镇江: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %长春: 0.6 %长春: 0.6 %其他IndiaUnited States上海东莞北京南宁吉林张家口杭州深圳芒廷维尤苏州莫斯科西宁镇江长春

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (286) PDF downloads(69) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return